NOTE | (NOK 1 000) | 2009 | 2008 | |
Net profit for the period | 446 251 | 3 944 | ||
Available-for-sale financial assets | 1 608 | -4 376 | ||
Exchange rate differences Group | -5 007 | 1 293 | ||
Total comprehensive income for the period | 442 852 | 861 | ||
Profit attributable to; | ||||
Owners of the company | 442 852 | 861 | ||
The notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. | ||||
Note 1 | Summary of significant accounting policies | ||||||
1.1 General information | |||||||
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA and its subsidiaries (together ‘the Group’) is a low-fare airline incorporated in Norway and headquartered at Fornebu outside of Oslo. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA is a public limited liability company and listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange. | |||||||
The consolidated financial statements of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA for the year ended 31 December 2009 were authorized for issue by the Board of Directors on 24 March 2010. | |||||||
1.2 Basis of preparation | |||||||
The consolidated financial statements of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), as adopted by the EU. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of available-for-sale financial assets, financial assets and financial liabilities (including derivative instruments) at fair value through profit or loss. | |||||||
In order to prepare financial statements in conformity with IFRS, it is necessary to use certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to exercise its judgment when applying the Group’s accounting policies. The areas which implicate a higher degree of judgment or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements, are disclosed in paragraph 1.5. | |||||||
1.2.1 Changes in accounting policy and disclosures | |||||||
Standards, amendments and interpretations | |||||||
The Group has adopted the following new standards, amendments and interpretations effective from 1 January 2009; | |||||||
- IFRS 2, Share-based payments (amendment) | |||||||
- IFRS 7, Financial instruments – disclosures (amendment) | |||||||
- IFRS 8, Operating segments | |||||||
- IAS 1, Financial instruments (revised) | |||||||
- IAS 23, Borrowing costs (revised) | |||||||
IFRS 7 requires additional disclosures but it has no impact on the financial position or the Group's performance. A statement of comprehensive income has been added to the financial statements, as a result of implementing IAS 1. IFRS 8 defines operating segments and resulted in reassessment of segment reporting. Accordingly, the Group is defined as one segment. The implementation of IFRS 2 and IAS 23 have not had any impact on the Group's financial statements as similar principles are applied under previous standards. | |||||||
The following standards, amendments and interpretations are not effective at 31 December 2009 and have not been early adopted by the Group; | |||||||
Effective for periods beginning on or after | |||||||
- IFRS 2, Scope of IFRS 2 and IFRS 3 (revised) | 1 July 2009 | ||||||
- IFRS 2, Group cash-settled and share-based payments transactions (amendment) | 1 January 2010 | ||||||
- IFRS 3, Business combinations (revised) | 1 July 2009 | ||||||
- IFRS 5, Measurement of non current assets classified as held-for-sale (amendment) | 1 January 2010 | ||||||
- IFRS 5, Disclosures required in respect of non current assets | 1 January 2010 | ||||||
- IFRS 8, Disclosure of information about segment assets | 1 January 2010 | ||||||
- IAS 1, Current/non current classification of convertible instruments | 1 January 2010 | ||||||
- IAS 7, Classification of expenditures on unrecognised assets | 1 January 2010 | ||||||
- IAS 17, Classification of leases of land and buildings | 1 January 2010 | ||||||
- IAS 27, Consolidated and separate financial statements (revised) | 1 July 2009 | ||||||
- IAS 38, Intangible assets (amendment) | 1 July 2009 | ||||||
- IAS 36, Unit of accounting goodwill impairment test | 1 January 2010 | ||||||
- IAS 38, Additional consequential amendments arising from IFRS 3 (revised) | 1 January 2010 | ||||||
- IAS 38, Measuring the fair value of an intangible asset acquired in a business combination | 1 January 2010 | ||||||
- IAS 39, Treating loan prepayment penalties as closely related derivatives | 1 January 2010 | ||||||
- IAS 39, Scope exemption for business combinations | 1 January 2010 | ||||||
- IAS 39, Cash flow hedge accounting | 1 January 2010 | ||||||
- IAS 39, Hedging using internal contracts | 1 January 2010 | ||||||
- IFRIC 9, Reassessment of embedded derivatives and IAS 39 (amendment) | 30 June 2009 | ||||||
- IFRIC 17, Distribution of non-cash assets to owners | 1 July 2009 | ||||||
- IFRIC 18, Transfers of assets from Customers | 1 July 2009 | ||||||
- IFRIC 9 and IFRS 3, Scope of IFRIC 9 and IFRS 3 (revised) | 1 July 2009 | ||||||
- IFRIC 16, Hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation | 1 July 2009 | ||||||
These standards, amendments and interpretation are not expected to have material impact on the financial statements. | |||||||
1.3 Basis of consolidation | |||||||
The Group’s consolidated financial statements comprise Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA, and its fully owned subsidiaries Norwegian Air Shuttle Polska Sp.zo.o , Norwegian Air Shuttle Sweden AB, NAS Asset Management Ireland Ltd, NAS Asset Management Norway AS and Call Norwegian AS. Additionally, the Group controls a company in the United States, DY 1 Leasing LLC. This is a special purpose entity (SPE) established for aircraft financing purposes. The Group does not own the shares, but has all risks and rewards related to the assets, liabilities and operations in the SPE. | |||||||
The financial statements of the subsidiaries and SPE’s are prepared for the same reporting period as the parent company, using consistent accounting policies. | |||||||
The purchase method is applied when accounting for business combinations. Companies which have been purchased or sold during the year are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date when control is achieved and till the date when control is ceased. | |||||||
The cost of an acquisition is measured as the fair value of the assets given, equity instruments issued and liabilities incurred or assumed at the date of exchange, plus costs directly attributable to the acquisition. Identifiable assets acquired liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date, irrespective of the extent of any minority interest. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the Group’s share of the identifiable net assets acquired, is recorded as goodwill. | |||||||
All intra Group balances, transactions, income and expense and profit and losses resulting from intra Group transactions that are recognized in assets and liabilities, are completely eliminated. | |||||||
An associate is an entity in which the Group has a significant influence but does not control the management of its finances and operations (normally when the Group owns 20%-50% of the company). The consolidated financial statements include the Group’s share of the profits/losses from associates, accounted for using the equity method, from the date when a significant influence is achieved and till the date when such influence is ceased. The Group’s share of its associates’ post- acquisition profits or losses is recognized in the income statement, and its share of post-acquisition movements in reserves is recognized in reserves. The cumulative post-acquisition movements are adjusted against the carrying amount of the investment. Dilution gains and losses arising in investments in associates are recognized in the income statement. | |||||||
When the Group’s share of a loss exceeds the Group’s investment in an associate, the amount carried in the Group’s balance sheet is reduced to zero and further losses are not recognized unless the Group has an obligation to cover any such loss. Unrealized gains on transactions between the Group and its associates are eliminated to the extent of the Group’s interest in the associates. Unrealized losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Accounting policies of associates have been changed when necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by the Group. | |||||||
All other investments are recognized in accordance with IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, and additional information is provided in note 20. | |||||||
1.4 Foreign currency translation | |||||||
The Group’s presentation currency is NOK. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA’s functional currency is NOK. Each entity in the Group determines its own functional currency, and items included in the financial statements of each entity are measured in that functional currency. For consolidation purposes, the balance sheet figures in subsidiaries with a different functional currency than NOK are translated at the closing rate at the balance sheet date. Income and expenses for each income statement are translated at average exchange rate for the period, this being a reasonable approximation for actual rate. Exchange differences are recognized in comprehensive income and specified separately in equity. | |||||||
Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded in the functional currency rate ruling at the date of transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the functional currency rate of exchange ruling at the balance sheet date. All differences are recognized in profit or loss. Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the dates of the initial transactions. | |||||||
Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at the closing rate. | |||||||
1.5 Critical accounting estimates and judgments | |||||||
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management has to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. The critical judgments and key sources of estimation uncertainty that have been made in preparing the consolidated financial statements are detailed below. These judgments involve assumptions or estimates in respect of future events which can vary from what is expected. | |||||||
The lease contracts require the aircraft to be returned at the end of the lease in accordance with the specific redelivery conditions stated in the specific lease contracts. To meet this requirement, the Group maintains aircraft, both regularly and at the expiration of the leasing period. Provisions are made based on the estimated costs of overhaul and maintenance. To estimate these conditions, management must make assumptions regarding expected future maintenance. For sensitivity analysis, see note 12. | |||||||
Deferred tax assets are recognized for all unused tax losses to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be generated. Significant management judgment is required to determine the amount of deferred tax assets that can be recognized, based upon the likely timing and level of future taxable profits together with future tax planning strategies. See note 9 for further details. | |||||||
The cost of defined benefit pension plans is determined by using actuarial valuations. The actuarial valuation involves making assumptions about discount rates, expected rates of return on assets, future salary increases, mortality rates and future pension increases. Due to the long term nature of these plans, such estimates are subject to significant uncertainty. A sensitivity analysis is outlined in note 18. | |||||||
The Group tests annually whether goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives, have suffered any impairment in accordance with the accounting policy stated in note 1.8. The recoverable amounts of cash-generating units have been determined based on value-in-use calculations. These calculations require the use of estimates (see note 10). | |||||||
Bad debt provisions for credit card receivables are based on actual historical loss percentage and actual withdrawal for payments from credit card companies. | |||||||
Fair value of financial instruments is determined using fair value estimation techniques. Valuation techniques and details on financial instruments are outlined in note 20. | |||||||
1.6 Tangible assets | |||||||
Tangible assets are carried at historical cost, less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. When assets are sold or disposed of, the gross carrying amount and accumulated depreciation and impairment losses are derecognized, and any gain or loss on the sale or disposal is recognized in the income statement. | |||||||
The gross carrying amount of non-current assets is the purchase price, including duties/taxes and direct acquisition costs relating to making the non-current asset ready for its intended use. Subsequent costs, such as repair and maintenance costs, are normally recognized in profit or loss as incurred. When increased future economic benefits are the result of repair and maintenance work which can be verified, these costs will be recognized in the balance sheet as additions to non-current assets. Borrowing costs are capitalized on qualifying assets. | |||||||
Non-current assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis or by airborne hours and cycles over the estimated useful life of the asset beginning when the asset is ready for its intended use. Expected residual value is assessed when estimating the depreciable amount of the asset and deducted from the depreciable amount. | |||||||
An aircraft is decomposed into two components for depreciation purposes to reflect different useful lives of the aircraft components. In accordance with official requirements, the aircraft must be maintained and significant components changed after a specific number of takeoffs or airborne hours. These components are identified as C check and D check on aircraft body, power restoration and life limited parts for the two engines on each plane, as well as maintenance on landing gears and APU. The maintenance and overhaul on these components occurs on a defined interval, and the value is depreciated based on number of takeoffs or airborne hours until the next maintenance occurs. Completed maintenance and overhaul is capitalized and depreciated until the next relevant maintenance and overhaul. The second aircraft component is defined as the remainder of the aircraft and depreciated over the economic useful life. | |||||||
Investments in leased aircraft including cabin interior modifications are depreciated over their useful lives, but not exceeding the remaining leasing period. | |||||||
Rotable spare parts are carried as non current assets and depreciated over their useful lives. | |||||||
Buildings are carried at acquisition cost, less accumulated depreciation. | |||||||
The Group capitalizes prepayments on the purchase contract of 46 Boeing 737 aircraft. The prepayments are classified as tangible assets as presented at the face of the balance sheet. The prepayments include capitalized borrowing costs and gains/losses on qualifying fair value hedges. At the delivery of the aircraft, prepayments are included in acquisition cost of the aircraft and reclassified as aircraft in the balance sheet. | |||||||
Financial lease assets are initially recognized at the lowest of acquisition cost and future minimum lease payments. The assets are carried as non current assets and depreciated on a straight-line basis over their expected useful lives. | |||||||
The depreciation period and method are assessed each year to ensure that the method and period used reconcile with the substance of the non-current asset. The residual value is estimated at each year end and changes to the residual value are accounted for prospectively. Additional details on tangible assets are outlined in note 11. | |||||||
1.7 Intangible assets | |||||||
Computer software | |||||||
Acquired computer software licenses are capitalized on the basis of the costs incurred to obtain and apply the specific software. These costs are amortized over their estimated useful life. | |||||||
Costs associated with developing or maintaining computer software programs are recognized as an expense as incurred. Costs that are directly associated with the development of identifiable software products controlled by the Group, and that probably will generate economic benefits, are recognized as intangible assets. Computer software development costs recognized as assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives. The amortization of the software commence as each module is completed. | |||||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets | |||||||
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the Group’s share of the net identifiable assets of the acquired subsidiary at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment and carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Gains and losses on the disposal of an entity include the carrying amount of goodwill relating to the entity sold. | |||||||
Other intangible assets are related to identifiable assets from business combinations and investments in other intangible assets. | |||||||
Intangible assets that are determined to have indefinite economic lives, are not amortized, but subject for annual impairment testing. The determination of indefinite economic lives is based on management’s assessment that there is no foreseeable limit to the period over which the asset is expected to generate net cash inflows for the entity. | |||||||
See note 1.8 for details of impairment testing of non-financial assets and note 10 for additional details on intangible assets. | |||||||
1.8 Impairment of non financial assets | |||||||
Intangible assets that have an indefinite economic useful life are not subject to amortization and are tested annually for impairment. Assets that are subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use. | |||||||
For the purposes of impairment testing, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash-generating units). The allocation is made to those cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the assets. Management has assessed the Group as one segment and the total operations in the Group as its cash generating unit. The determination of cash generating units is based on how management operates and assesses the Group’s performance, profit and cash flow. The aircraft fleet is operated as one unit and the route portfolio is administered and diversified as one unit generating the Group's profit and cash flow; hence, goodwill and other non current assets are reallocated to the entire Group for the purpose of impairment testing. | |||||||
Non current assets other than goodwill that suffered impairment are reviewed for possible reversal of the impairment at each reporting date. Impairment losses on goodwill are not reversed. | |||||||
1.9 Financial assets | |||||||
Financial assets are classified in the following categories; at fair value through profit or loss, held-to-maturity investments, loans and receivables and available-for-sale. The Group holds financial instruments that are classified at fair value through profit or loss, available-for-sale, and loans and receivables. The classification depends on the purpose for which the financial assets were acquired. Management determines the classification of its financial assets at initial recognition. | |||||||
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are financial assets held for trading. A financial asset is classified in this category if acquired principally for the purpose of selling in the short-term. Derivatives are also categorized as held for trading unless they are designated as hedges. Assets in this category are classified as current assets. | |||||||
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They are included in current assets, except for maturities greater than 12 months after the balance sheet date. These are classified as non-current assets. The Group’s loans and receivables comprise trade, other receivables, cash and cash equivalents in the balance sheet (See note 1.12 and 1.13 respectively). | |||||||
Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivatives that are either designated in this category or not classified in any of the other categories. They are included in non-current assets unless management intends to dispose of the investment within 12 months of the balance sheet date. | |||||||
Regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized on the trade-date; the date on which the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset. Investments are initially recognized at fair value plus transaction costs for all financial assets not carried at fair value through profit or loss. Financial assets carried at fair value through profit or loss, are initially recognized at fair value and transaction costs are expensed in the income statement. | |||||||
Financial assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or have been transferred and the Group has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership. Available-for-sale financial assets and financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are subsequently carried at fair value. Loans and receivables are carried at amortized cost using the effective interest method. | |||||||
Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of the ’available-for-sale’ category are presented in statement of comprehensive income, within ’other reserves’ in the period in which they arise. Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of the ‘available-for-sale’ category are presented in the statement of comprehensive income in the period in which they arise. Interests on available-for-sale securities calculated using the effective interest method is recognized in the income statement as part of other income. Dividend income from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and available- for- sale financial assets are recognized in the income statement as a part of other income when the Group’s right to receive payments is established. | |||||||
1.9.1 Impairment of financial assets | |||||||
The Group assesses at each balance sheet date whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets are impaired. The fair values of quoted investments are based on current mid prices at the balance sheet date. If the market for a financial asset is not active (and for unlisted securities), the Group establishes fair value by using valuation techniques. The valuation hierarchy for financial assets is detailed in note 20 where the techniques are making maximum use of market inputs and relying as little as possible on entity-specific inputs. | |||||||
Impairment losses of financial assets measured at amortized cost are incurred only if there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that occurred after initial recognition. Impairment losses are recognized in the consolidated income statement if the losses have had an impact on the estimated future cash flows and that the impact can be reliably estimated. | |||||||
Impairment losses of available-for-sale financial assets are incurred if evidence exists of a prolonged or significant decline in the fair value of the security below its initial cost. If any such evidence exists, the cumulative loss (measured as the difference between the initial cost and the current fair value, less any impairment loss on that financial asset previously recognized in profit or loss) is removed from equity and comprehensive income and recognized in the income statement. If, in a subsequent period, increase in the fair value of available-for–sale financial assets occur and the increase can be objectively related to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognized in profit or loss, the impairment loss is reversed through the statement of comprehensive income. | |||||||
1.10 Derivative financial instruments and hedging activities | |||||||
Derivatives are initially recognized at fair value on the transaction date and subsequently measured at their fair value. The method of recognizing the resulting gain or loss depends on whether the derivative is designated as a hedging instrument, and if so, the nature of the item being hedged. In 2008, the Group designated some of its derivatives as hedges of the fair value of a firm commitment (fair value hedge). | |||||||
The Group documents at the inception of the transaction, the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management objectives and strategy for undertaking various hedging transactions. The Group also documents its assessment, both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis, of whether the derivatives that are designated as hedging instruments are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items. | |||||||
The fair values of various derivative instruments used for hedging purposes are disclosed in note 20. The full fair value of a hedging derivative is classified as a non-current asset or liability when the remaining hedged item is more than 12 months and as a current asset or liability when the remaining maturity of the hedged item is less than 12 months. Trading derivatives are classified as a current asset or liability. | |||||||
Fair value hedge | |||||||
Changes in fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges are recorded in the income statement, together with any changes in the fair value of the hedged assets or liabilities that are attributable to the hedged risk. The Group only applies fair value hedge accounting for hedging foreign currency risk in unrecognized firm commitments. The gain or loss relating to the effective portion of forward foreign currency contracts, hedging foreign currency risk in unrecognized firm commitments, is recognized as capitalized costs on the recognized firm commitment in the balance sheet. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognized in the income statement within financial items. | |||||||
If the hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, the adjustment to the carrying amount of the hedged item is depreciated over the useful life of the asset. | |||||||
1.11 Inventory | |||||||
Inventory of spare parts are carried at the lower of acquisition cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined using the first in – first out (FIFO) method. Obsolete inventory have been fully recognized as impairment losses. Inventory is consumed during maintenance and overhaul of the airplanes, and is expensed when consumed. | |||||||
1.12 Trade receivables | |||||||
Trade receivables are recognized initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less provision for impairment. A provision for impairment of trade receivables is established when there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of the receivables. Significant financial difficulties of the debtor, probability that the debtor will enter bankruptcy or payments more than 60 days overdue are considered indicators that the trade receivable is impaired. Provision for impairment (bad debt provision) is recognized within other operating expenses. | |||||||
Receivables from credit card companies are classified as trade receivables in the balance sheet. | |||||||
1.13 Cash and cash equivalents | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand and in banks, as well as short term deposits with an original maturity of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents in the balance sheet include restricted funds from withheld employee tax, guarantees and deposits pledged as collateral for suppliers (note 24). | |||||||
The Group holds investments in money market funds. These investments are classified as either cash equivalents or financial assets available-for-sale depending on the maturity of the investments. | |||||||
1.14 Equity | |||||||
Share capital comprises the number of shares multiplied by their nominal value, and are classified as equity. | |||||||
Transaction costs directly attributable to an equity transaction are recognized in equity net of tax. | |||||||
Acquisition of own shares are recognized in share capital and retained earnings. The number of shares purchased multiplied by the nominal value is deducted from outstanding share capital. The share premium paid is recognized in other equity. The sale of own shares is booked accordingly, with nominal value as increase of share capital, and share premium in other equity. | |||||||
1.15 Borrowings | |||||||
Borrowings are recognized initially at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred. Borrowings are subsequently measured at amortized cost; any difference between the proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption value is recognized in the income statement over the period of the borrowings using the effective interest method. | |||||||
Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the Group has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the balance sheet date. For details for capitalization of borrowing costs, see note 11. | |||||||
1.16 Provisions | |||||||
Provisions are recognized when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation and the amount has been reliably estimated. Where the Group expects some or all of a provision to be reimbursed, for example under an insurance contract, the reimbursement is recognized as a separate asset but only when the reimbursement is virtually certain. The expense relating to any provision is presented in the income statement net of any reimbursement. If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are discounted using a current pre tax rate that reflects, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability. Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognized as a finance cost. | |||||||
1.17 Employee benefits | |||||||
Defined benefit plans | |||||||
The Group operates a defined benefit pension plan which requires contributions to be made to a separately administered fund. In addition, the Group participates in an early retirement plan (AFP) for employments in Norway. The cost of providing benefits under the defined benefit plan is determined using the projected unit credit actuarial valuation method. Actuarial gains and losses are recognized as income or expense when the net cumulative unrecognized actuarial gains and losses, at the end of the previous reporting year, exceed 10% of the higher of the defined benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets at that date. These gains or losses are recognized over the expected average remaining working lives of the employees participating in the plans. | |||||||
The past service cost is recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the average period until the benefits are vested. If the benefits are already vested immediately following the introduction of or changes to a pension plan, past service cost is recognized immediately. | |||||||
The defined benefit obligation is the aggregate of the present value of the defined benefit obligation and actuarial gains and losses not recognized reduced by past service costs not yet recognized and the fair value of plan assets out of which the obligations are to be settled directly. If such aggregate is negative, the asset is measured at the lower of such aggregate or the aggregate of cumulative unrecognized net actuarial losses and past service cost and the present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plan or reductions in the future contributions to the plan. | |||||||
Defined contribution plans | |||||||
In addition to the defined benefit plan described above, the Group’s subsidiary in Sweden has made contributions to local pension plans. These contributions have been made to the pension plan for full-time employees and premiums are expensed as they incur. | |||||||
Share options | |||||||
The employees and the management of the Group have received options to buy shares in the parent company. The fair value of the options to be settled in equity instruments is estimated at the grant date and recognized as an expense over the vesting period. The fair value of the options to be settled in cash is estimated at each year end and recognized as an expense over the vesting period. The fair value is determined by an external part using a Black and Scholes model. The assumptions underlying the number of options expected to vest are adjusted to reflect conditions prevailing at the balance sheet date. For further details see note 17. | |||||||
Employee share purchase savings program | |||||||
Bonus shares and employer’s contribution are measured at fair value using Black and Scholes option pricing model. The bonus expenses for the company are included in personnel costs. The distribution of bonus shares is accounted for in accordance with IFRS 2, where the fair value of the share distribution is recognized as an expense over the expected period until settlement. Estimated employer’s contribution is recognized as an expense over the expected period until settlement. Changes in estimates affecting employer’s contribution are expensed over the remaining expected period. For further details see note 17. | |||||||
1.18 Current and deferred income tax | |||||||
Current income tax | |||||||
Current income tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. | |||||||
Deferred income tax | |||||||
Deferred income tax is determined by using the liability method on temporary differences at the balance sheet date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes. | |||||||
Deferred income tax liabilities are recognized for all taxable temporary differences. Deferred income tax assets are recognized for all deductible temporary differences, carry forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences, and the carry forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses can be utilized. | |||||||
The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilized. Unrecognized deferred income tax assets are reassessed at each balance sheet date and are recognized to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered. | |||||||
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is realized or the when the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted, or substantively enacted, at the balance sheet date. | |||||||
Deferred income tax assets and deferred income tax liabilities are offset to the extent that: | |||||||
- the Group has a legally enforceable right to offset the recognized amounts and | |||||||
- deferred tax assets and tax liabilities relates to income tax from the same tax authorities and same taxable entity in the Group, or if different taxable entities in the Group intends either to settle on a net basis, or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. | |||||||
Deferred income tax is provided on temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries and associates, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the Group and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future. | |||||||
1.19 Contingent assets and liabilities | |||||||
A contingent asset is not recognized in the annual financial statements, but disclosed in the notes where an inflow of economic benefits is probable. | |||||||
Contingent liabilities are defined as possible obligations arising from past events whose existence depends on future events, or it is not probable that they will lead to an outflow of resources, or cannot be measured with sufficient reliability. | |||||||
Contingent liabilities are not recognized in the annual financial statements, but significant contingent liabilities are disclosed in the notes to the financial statements, with the exception of contingent liabilities where the probability of the liability occurring is remote. | |||||||
1.20 Revenue recognition | |||||||
Revenue comprises the fair value of the consideration received or receivable for the sale of goods and services in the ordinary course of the Group’s activities. Revenue is shown net of value-added tax and discounts. The Group recognizes revenue when the amount of revenue can be reliably measured, it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the entity and when specific criteria have been met for each of the Group’s activities as described below | |||||||
Passenger revenue | |||||||
Passenger revenue is reported as traffic revenue when the air transport has been carried out. The value of tickets sold and still valid but not used at the balance sheet date (amounts sold in excess of revenue recognized) is reported as air traffic settlement liability. This liability is reduced either when the Group or another airline completes the transportation or when the passenger requests a refund. | |||||||
Ancillary revenue | |||||||
Ancillary revenue comprises sales of ticket-related products and services, e.g; excess baggage and fees. Some of the products and services are earned at the time when the transport has been carried out, and such revenue is recognized in the same manner as passenger revenue. Other products and services are earned at the time of purchase and immediately recognized in the income statement. | |||||||
Amounts paid by ‘no show’ customers are recognized as revenue when the booked service is provided. ‘No show’ customers with low fare tickets are not entitled to change flights or seek refunds once a flight has departed. | |||||||
Other revenue | |||||||
Other revenue comprises third party revenue, such as wet-lease, cargo and revenue from business activities in subsidiaries which are not airlines. | |||||||
Other airline revenue is recognized when the service has been rendered, fees are reliable measurable, collections are probable, and when other significant obligations have been fulfilled. | |||||||
Revenue from sales of GSM and Broadband products and services comprises traffic fees and subscription, as well as telephone and PC products. Revenue from subscription fees are recognized over the subscription period while deliveries of other services are recognized as revenue at the time of actual use. Revenue from product sales are recognized when the equipment including related significant risks and rewards are transferred to the buyer and the entity no longer retains effective control over the products sold. | |||||||
Customer loyalty program – Norwegian Reward | |||||||
The Group has implemented a customer loyalty program. Customers earn cash points in the following circumstances; | |||||||
- Bank Norwegian customer; 1% of the payment is earned on all purchases, except domestic flights within Norway or flights with competitive airlines within Norway. Additionally, cash points are earned on all low fare and full flex tickets purchased from Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA and paid with a Bank Norwegian credit card, with 4% and 19% of the purchase price, respectively. | |||||||
- My reward customer; 2% on all low fare tickets and 10% on all full flex tickets. | |||||||
- Corporate reward customer; 3% on all low fare tickets and 7% on all full flex tickets. | |||||||
- Call Norwegian customer; 3% of all purchases. | |||||||
Corporate customers gain cash points on all airfares. Private customers gain cash points on international flights only, as domestic flights in Norway are prohibited from cash points earning for private customers. | |||||||
Customer cash points gained from purchasing airline tickets and purchases from Call Norwegian are recognized as a liability in the balance sheet and deducted from the value of the purchase at the date of purchase. The customer cash point liability is derecognized from the balance sheet and recognized as income when customers utilize their cash points. | |||||||
Earned customer cash points on 1% reward from Bank Norwegian are recognized as a liability in the balance sheet and immediately expensed. When the customers utilize earned cash points, the liability is derecognized and cash payment on the Group’s services reduced. | |||||||
Unutilized cash points are derecognized from the balance sheet after three years. The liability is classified as short term, as available statistics as of 31 December 2009 indicate that customer cash points are utilized within one year. | |||||||
1.21 Leasing | |||||||
To determine whether an arrangement is, or contains a lease, it is necessary to assess whether the fulfillment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of a specific asset and if the arrangement conveys a right to use the asset. | |||||||
The lease agreements where most of the risk lies with the other contracting party are classified as operating leases. Operating lease payments are recognized as an expense in the income statement on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Payments for the lease and payments for other elements are recognized separately. | |||||||
Deposits made at the inception of operating leases are carried at amortized cost. The difference between the nominal value of a deposit paid carried at less than market interest and its fair value is considered as additional rent payable to the lessor and is expensed on a straight-line basis over the lease term. | |||||||
The Group leases tangible assets where the lease agreements transfer all material risks and rewards of the asset to the lessee at the end of the lease term. Such lease agreements are classified as financial leases. Financial leases are recognized at inception to the lowest of acquisition cost and the net present value of minimum lease payments. Financial lease assets are depreciated on a linear basis over the lease period if such is shorter than the economic useful life of the financial lease asset. Financial lease assets are included in the balance sheet as tangible assets. | |||||||
Each lease payment under financial leases is split between the lease liability and finance cost to amortize the financial costs related to such leases over the lease period. The lease liability is classified as borrowings, see note 22 for details. | |||||||
1.22 Segment reporting | |||||||
The Group has one operational segment, which is low cost air passenger travel. The Group has one geographical segment which is the route portfolio in Europe. See note 4 for further details. | |||||||
1.23 Events after the balance sheet date | |||||||
New information regarding the Group’s positions at the balance sheet date is taken into account in the preparation of the annual financial statements. Events which occur after the balance sheet date that do not affect the Group’s position at the balance sheet date, but which will affect the Group’s position in the future, are stated if significant. | |||||||
Note 2 | Financial risk | |||||||
The Group’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks; market risk (including currency risk, interest rate risk and price risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The Group’s overall risk management program focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to minimize potential adverse effects on the Group’s financial performance. The Group uses derivative financial instruments to hedge certain risk exposures. | ||||||||
Risk management is carried out by a central treasury department (Group treasury) under policies approved by the Board of Directors. Group treasury identifies evaluates and hedges financial risk in close co-operation with the Group’s operating units. The Board provides principles for overall risk management such as foreign currency risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, use of derivative financial instruments and investment of excess liquidity. | ||||||||
Market risk | ||||||||
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, jet-fuel prices and interest rates will affect the Group’s income or value of its holdings of financial instruments. | ||||||||
Foreign Currency Risk | ||||||||
A substantial part of the Group’s expenses are denominated in foreign currency. The Group’s leases, aircraft borrowings, maintenance, jet-fuel and related expenses are mainly denominated in USD, and a share of airplane operation expenses are denominated in EUR. Foreign currency risk arises from future commercial transactions, recognised assets and liabilities and net investments in foreign operations. In order to reduce currency risk, the Group has a mandate to hedge up to 100% of its currency exposure over the next 12 months. The hedging consists of forward currency contracts and flexible forwards. | ||||||||
Occasionally the Group designates certain forward foreign currency contracts as hedging instruments to hedge the fair value of currency risk in unrecognised firm commitments. | ||||||||
The Group has included sensitivity analysis on foreign currency risk based on two different scenarios; sensitivity in USD to NOK on financial assets and liabilities at 31 December and actual sensitivity in USD exposure interdependent with jet-fuel. The rationale for such sensitivity is that USD exposure in the airline industry is closely related to USD exposure on jet-fuel as jet-fuel actually represents a USD exposure. | ||||||||
If NOK had weakened/strengthened by 1 % against USD in 2009, with all other variables held constant, pre-tax profit and pre-tax equity effect for the year would have been MNOK 6.2 (2008: MNOK 0.3) lower/higher, mainly as a result of foreign exchange losses/gains on receivables, payables, derivative financial instruments and borrowings in USD. | ||||||||
By calculating sensitivity on foreign currency risk in USD using USD and jet-fuel prices as interdependent variables on operating income, a weakening/strengthening in NOK by 1% against USD dollar, pre-tax profit and pre-tax equity effect for 2009 would have been MNOK 28.7 (2008:MNOK 31) lower/higher. This calculation is based on estimated fuel consumption over the next 12 months, estimated net outflow of USD over the next 12 months, estimated average jet-fuel price and estimated average USD/NOK exchange rate. | ||||||||
If NOK had weakened/strengthened by 1 % against EUR with all other variables held constant, pre-tax profit and pre-tax equity effect for the year would have been MNOK 0.6 (2008: MNOK 3.6) higher/lower, mainly as a result of foreign exchange gains/losses on receivables, payables and derivative financial instruments. | ||||||||
The Group has investments in operations in Sweden and Poland, whose net assets are exposed to foreign currency translation risk. Currency exposure arising from the net assets of the Group’s foreign operations is regarded as immaterial for the Group, and currency variances are not hedged. | ||||||||
Interest rate risk | ||||||||
As the Group has net interest bearing debt, the Group’s income and operating cash flows are dependent of changes in the market interest rates. The Group’s interest rate risk arises from cash and cash equivalents and floating interest rate borrowings. Floating interest rate borrowings consist of unsecured bond issue, revolving credit facility and financial lease. Borrowings issued at fixed rates expose the group to fair value interest rate risk. Fixed interest rate borrowings consist of aircraft financing from PEFCO, guaranteed by the Ex-Im Bank of the United States. Borrowings are denominated in USD and NOK. | ||||||||
If the floating interest rate in 2009 had been 1 % higher/lower with all other variables held constant, pre-tax profit and pre-tax equity effect for the year would have been MNOK 2.0 (2008: MNOK 2.4) lower/higher, mainly as a result of higher/lower interest income and expenseon floating rate cash and cash equivalents and borrowings. The sensitivity analysis of interest rate risk is calculated based on nominal value of borrowings and cash and cash equivalents. | ||||||||
The Group measures borrowings at amortized cost. No changes in fair value of fixed rate interest rate borrowings would be accounted for. Fair value calculations of fixed interest rate borrowings are detailed in note 22. | ||||||||
Jet-fuel prices | ||||||||
Expenses for jet-fuel represents a substantial part of the Group’s operating costs, and fluctuations in the jet-fuel prices influence the projected cash flows. The objective of the jet-fuel price risk management policy is to provide protection against significant and sudden increases in jet-fuel prices whilst retaining access to price reductions. The Group manages jet-fuel price risk using fuel derivatives. Management has a mandate to hedge up to 100 % of its expected consumption over the next 12 months with forward commodity contracts. | ||||||||
If the jet-fuel price in 2009 had increased/decreased by 1 % with all other variables held constant, pre-tax profit for the year would have been MNOK 17.0 (2008: MNOK 17.0) lower/higher. | ||||||||
The sensitivity analysis is calculated based on estimated jet-fuel consumption including estimated hedged consumption over the next 12 months. As opposed to the sensitivity analysis of USD currency risk, the jet-fuel price risk analysis is not based on interdependence between jet-fuel price and USD exchange rates. The sensitivity is calculated using USD/NOK exchange rate at the balance sheet date. | ||||||||
The Group holds forward commodity contracts to hedge jet-fuel price risk. Such derivative contracts affect the financial statements through unrealized gains/losses from jet-fuel prices. If jet-fuel price had increased/decreased by 1% with all other variables held constant, pre-tax profit for the year would have been MNOK 21.3 (2008: MNOK 2) higher/lower, as a result of unrealized gains/losses on price changes on forward commodity contracts held at the balance sheet date. | ||||||||
Credit risk | ||||||||
Credit risk is managed on group basis. Credit risk arises from cash and cash equivalents, derivative financial instruments and deposits with banks and financial institutions, as well as credit exposures to travel agencies and commercial customers, including outstanding receivables and committed transactions. The utilisation of credit limits is regularly monitored. The Group’s policy is to maintain credit sales at a minimum level. Sales to private customers are settled in cash or using major credit card companies. | ||||||||
For a part of the Group’s sales, customers pay at the time of booking while Norwegian receive the actual payments from the credit card companies, or acquires, are received at a later point in time. Delayed payments from credit card companies vary between credit card brands. The risk arising from receivables on credit card companies or credit card acquires are monitored closely. | ||||||||
Credit risk related to bank defaults are closely monitored and partly offset by diversifying the Group’s deposit portfolio. | ||||||||
There are re-invoicing of maintenance costs on aircraft to leasing companies, and Norwegian regularly evaluates and assesses the value of these credits. See note 20 for further disclosure on credit risk. | ||||||||
Liquidity risk | ||||||||
Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining sufficient cash and marketable securities, the availability of funding through an adequate amount of committed credit facilities and the ability to close out market positions. | ||||||||
The management monitors rolling forecasts of the Group’s liquidity reserve, cash and cash equivalents (see note 24) on the basis of expected cash flow. This is generally carried out at the local level in the operating companies of the Group in accordance with practice and limits set by the Group. In addition, the Group's liquidity management policy involves projecting cash flows in major currencies and considering the level of liquid assets necessary to monitor balance sheet liquidity ratios against internal and external regulatory requirements and maintaining debt financing plans. | ||||||||
The Group will take deliveries of 7 aircraft in 2010, 14 aircraft in 2011 and the remaining 25 aircraft between 2012 and 2014. Pre-delivery payments related to the delivery of the first 10 aircraft were secured in 2007. 2 aircraft included in the pre-delivery payments, were delivered in 2009. Another 7 aircraft with delivery in 2010 were also included in the pre-delivery payments. At the delivery of the aircraft, pre-delivery payments are replaced with other long term financing. The Group has secured the financing of 5 aircraft in 2010 through guarantees and direct loans from the Ex-Im Bank of the United States and is currently in the process of securing long term financing for the last 2 deliveries in 2010. This financing arrangement reduces liquidity risk. | ||||||||
The table below analyses the maturity profile of the Group’s financial liabilities at the balance sheet date. The amounts disclosed are the contractual undiscounted cash flows; | ||||||||
At 31 December 2009 (NOK 1 000) | Less than 1 year | Between 1 and 2 years | Between 2 and 5 years | Over 5 years | ||||
Borrowings | 675 303 | 362 991 | 330 668 | 214 048 | ||||
Financial lease liability | 5 100 | 5 100 | 13 737 | 10 615 | ||||
Derivative contracts - payments | 1 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Trade and other payables | 746 549 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Interest on borrowings *) | 65 023 | 52 666 | 143 417 | 113 572 | ||||
Total financial liabilities | 1 493 202 | 420 756 | 487 823 | 338 234 | ||||
*) Calculated interests on borrowings | ||||||||
At 31 December 2008 (NOK 1 000) | Less than 1 year | Between 1 and 2 years | Between 2 and 5 years | Over 5 years | ||||
Borrowings | 257 456 | 440 873 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Derivative contracts - payments | 195 577 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Trade and other payables | 694 832 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Subordinated bond loan *) | 30 000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Interest on borrowings **) | 37 855 | 7 981 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Total financial liabilities | 1 215 720 | 448 854 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Derivative contracts - receipts | -91 253 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Total | 1 124 467 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
*) Subordinated bond loan issued to Bank Norwegian | ||||||||
**) Calculated interests on borrowings | ||||||||
Capital risk management | ||||||||
The Group’s capital management policy is to maintain a capital structure which meets the demands of operations, reducing cost of capital, risk factors in the industry, company specific risk and future investments planned by the Group. The Group will at all times adjust debt and equity to maintain and secure optimal capital structure by continuously monitoring the gearing ratio of the Group. This ratio is calculated as net debt divided by total capital. Net debt is calculated as total borrowings (including current and non-current borrowings less cash and cash equivalents as shown in the consolidated balance sheet). Total capital is calculated as equity as shown in the consolidated balance sheet plus net debt. | ||||||||
The gearing ratios at 31 December 2009 and 2008 were as follows; | ||||||||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Total borrowings (note 22) | 1 583 010 | 698 330 | ||||||
Cash and cash equvalents (note 24) | 1 408 475 | 607 536 | ||||||
Net debt | 174 535 | 90 794 | ||||||
Total equity | 1 601 607 | 897 368 | ||||||
Total capital | 1 776 142 | 988 162 | ||||||
Gearing ratio | 9.8% | 9.2% | ||||||
Note 3 | Fair value estimation | |||||
Financial instruments that are measured in the balance sheet at fair value, requires disclosure of fair value measurements by level of the following fair value measurement hierarchy: | ||||||
Level 1 | ||||||
The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets is based on quoted market prices at the balance sheet date. A market is regarded as active if quoted prices are readily and regularly available and represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm’s length basis. | ||||||
Level 2 | ||||||
The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined by using valuation techniques. These valuation techniques maximise the use of observable market data where it is available and rely as little as possible on entity specific estimates. Financial instruments in level 2 include forward contracts classified as derivatives. The fair values of forward foreign currency contracts and forward commodities contracts are determined using forward prices and rates at the balance sheet date, with the resulting value discounted back to present value. | ||||||
Level 3 | ||||||
If one or more of the significant inputs are not based on observable market data, specific valuation techniques are used. Financial instruments included in the level 3 valuation technique relates to investment in unlisted shares in Silver Pensjonsforsikring classified as available-for-sale financial assets. See note 20 for additional details on available-for-sale financial assets. | ||||||
The following table presents financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value at 31 December 2009; | ||||||
(NOK 1 000) | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||
Assets | ||||||
Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss | ||||||
- Derivative financial instruments | 23 688 | 0 | 23 688 | |||
Available-for-sale financial assets | 0 | 7 236 | 7 236 | |||
Total assets | 23 688 | 7 236 | 30 924 | |||
Liabilities | ||||||
- Derivative financial liabilities | 1 227 | 0 | 1 227 | |||
Total liabilities | 1 227 | 0 | 1 227 | |||
There are no fair value calculations in level 1. | ||||||
Note 4 | Segment Information | ||||
Executive management reviews the Group’s internal reporting in order to assess performance and allocate resources. Management has determined the operating segment based on these reports. Executive management considers the business as one operational segment, which is low cost air passenger travel. The Group’s operating profit arises from airline-related activities and the main revenue generating assets of the Group is its aircraft fleet, which is employed flexibly across the Group's geographical segment which is Europe. | |||||
Performance is measured by executive management based on the operating segment earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). Other information is measured in a manner consistent with that in the financial statements. | |||||
The table below shows revenues from low cost air passenger travel split between passenger revenue, ancillary revenue and other revenue. A split in revenue between domestic and international flights is also included; | |||||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | |||
By activity: | |||||
Passenger transport | 6 389 406 | 5 641 533 | |||
Ancillary revenue | 788 655 | 463 609 | |||
Other revenues | 131 129 | 121 271 | |||
Total | 7 309 189 | 6 226 413 | |||
By geographic market: | |||||
Norway | 2 899 736 | 2 294 940 | |||
Other EU/EEA countries | 4 409 454 | 3 931 473 | |||
Total | 7 309 189 | 6 226 413 | |||
Note 5 | Operational expenses | |
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 |
Sales and distribution expenses | 149 415 | 115 251 |
Aviation fuel | 1 423 328 | 2 006 248 |
Aircraft leases | 620 114 | 426 597 |
Airport charges | 1 037 716 | 841 999 |
Handling charges | 722 658 | 615 740 |
Technical maintenance expenses | 659 796 | 574 077 |
Other aircraft expenses | 325 371 | 312 815 |
Total operational expenses | 4 938 399 | 4 892 727 |
Note 5 a | Other operating expenses | ||||
Other operating expenses amount to MNOK 396.1 (2008:318.1). Other operating expenses are related to operating the systems, marketing, back office, consultants and other costs not directly attributable to the operation of the aircraft fleet and related airline specific costs. | |||||
Note 6 | Payroll expenses and number of employees | |
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 |
Wages and salaries | 762 772 | 682 882 |
Social security tax | 138 472 | 121 525 |
Pension expenses | 138 485 | 120 894 |
Employee stock options | 8 437 | 6 232 |
Other benefits | 39 439 | 31 448 |
Hired crew personnel | 215 695 | 113 087 |
Total | 1 303 299 | 1 076 068 |
Payroll expenses include hired crew personnel. The employees in Norway are members of the parent company’s defined benefit pension plan, while the employees in Sweden are members of a defined pension contribution plan. See note 18 for details. | ||
Number of man-labour years *) | ||
2009 | 2008 | |
Norway | 1 494 | 1 146 |
Sweden | 113 | 159 |
Poland | 77 | 73 |
Total | 1 684 | 1 378 |
*) excluding man-labour years related to hired crew personnel | ||
Note 7 | Remuneration to the Board of Directors and Executive Management | |||||||||
Remuneration to the Board of Directors | ||||||||||
Total remuneration paid to the Board in 2009 was MNOK 0.7. The Chairman of the Board, Bjørn Kise, received MNOK 0.2. There were no bonuses or other forms of compensation paid to the Board members in 2009. | ||||||||||
Directive of remuneration to the CEO and the Executive Management | ||||||||||
The principles for leadership remuneration in Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA are to stimulate a strong and lasting profit oriented culture. The total compensation level should be competitive, however, not market leading compared to similar organizations. The Board defines the remuneration to the CEO, and the guidelines for remuneration to the Executive Management. The remuneration to the Board and the Executive Management must not have negative effects for the Group, nor damage the reputation and standing of the Group in the public eye. There have been no changes in the guidelines or principles for management remuneration during the year. The actual remuneration in 2009 was consistent with the guidelines and principles. | ||||||||||
Compensation to the Executive Management should primarily consist of fixed yearly salary with additional compensations such as a company car, free telephone, internet and newspapers, and standard pension and insurance plan. Executive Management is also a part of the Group’s stock option plan. | ||||||||||
The CEO does not receive compensation in form of performance based salary or bonuses. The Executive Management can on an individual basis be awarded special compensation for profit enhancing projects. | ||||||||||
The Executive Management is part of the Group’s collective pension plan for salary up to 12 G, which applies to all employees. Senior Management has no special rights in the event of termination of employment. | ||||||||||
Total compensation year 2009 | ||||||||||
NOK 1 000 | Fee | Salary | Bonus | Other benefits **) | Total Compensation | Pension expense ***) | ||||
The Board of Directors | ||||||||||
Bjørn Kise (chairman) | 193 | 193 | ||||||||
Erik Gunnar Braathen (deputy chairman until 26.11.2009) | 150 | 150 | ||||||||
Liv Berstad | 100 | 100 | ||||||||
Ola Krohn-Fagervoll | 100 | 100 | ||||||||
Marianne Wergeland Jenssen | 100 | 100 | ||||||||
Halvor Vatnar*) | 35 | 35 | ||||||||
Sissel Gjelstad Vårum*) | 35 | 35 | ||||||||
Monika Johansen*) | 35 | 35 | ||||||||
Total board of directors | 748 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 748 | 0 | ||||
Executive Management | ||||||||||
Bjørn Kjos (Chief Executive Officer) | 1 256 | 175 | 1 431 | a) | 127 | |||||
Frode Foss (Chief Financial Officer) | 1 110 | 118 | 1 228 | b) | 79 | |||||
Asgeir Nyseth (Chief Operating Officer) | 1 186 | 10 | 1 196 | c) | 121 | |||||
Hans-Petter Aanby (Chief IT Officer) | 1 110 | 116 | 1 226 | d) | 104 | |||||
Daniel Skjeldam (Chief Commercial Officer) | 1 055 | 99 | 1 154 | e) | 44 | |||||
Gunnar Martinsen (Senior Vice President HR and Organisation) | 826 | 18 | 844 | 105 | ||||||
Anne-Sissel Skånvik (Senior Vice President Corporate Communications) | 825 | 111 | 936 | f) | 123 | |||||
Total executive management | 0 | 7 368 | 0 | 647 | 8 015 | 702 | ||||
*) For the employee representatives in the Board of Directors, only their fee for serving on the Board of Directors fee is stated. | ||||||||||
**) Other benefits include company car, telephone, internet etc. | ||||||||||
***) Pension expense reflects paid pension premium less employee contribution | ||||||||||
a) Bjørn Kjos exercised share options in 2009 that has been reported as additional taxable income with NOK 466 830. | ||||||||||
b) Frode Foss exercised share options in 2009 that has been reported as additional taxable income with NOK 384 039. | ||||||||||
c) Asgeir Nyseth exercised share options in 2009 that has been reported as additional taxable income with NOK 385 894. | ||||||||||
d) Hans-Petter Aanby exercised share options in 2009 that has been reported as additional taxable income with NOK 384 735. | ||||||||||
e) Daniel Skjeldam exercised share options in 2009 that has been reported as additional taxable income with NOK 176 249. | ||||||||||
f) Anne-Sissel Skånvik was appointed in 2009, replacing former Senior Vice President Corporate Communications. | ||||||||||
Total compensation year 2008 | ||||||||||
NOK 1 000 | Fee | Salary | Bonus | Other benefits **) | Total Compensation | Pension expense ***) | ||||
The Board of Directors | ||||||||||
Erik Gunnar Braathen (chairman) | 150 | 150 | ||||||||
Bjørn Kise (deputy chairman) | 125 | 125 | ||||||||
Berit Slåtto Neerbye | 100 | 100 | ||||||||
Liv Berstad | 100 | 100 | ||||||||
Ola Krohn-Fagervoll | 100 | 100 | ||||||||
Halvor Vatnar*) | 35 | 35 | ||||||||
Sissel Gjelstad Vårum*) | 35 | 35 | ||||||||
Monika Johansen*) | 35 | 35 | ||||||||
Total board of directors | 680 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 680 | 0 | ||||
Executive Management | ||||||||||
Bjørn Kjos (Chief Executive Officer) | 1 291 | 173 | 1 464 | 181 | ||||||
Frode Foss (Chief Financial Officer) | 1 144 | 117 | 1 261 | 84 | ||||||
Asgeir Nyseth (Chief Operating Officer) | 1 081 | 10 | 1 091 | 113 | ||||||
Hans-Petter Aanby (Chief IT Officer) | 1 269 | 114 | 1 383 | 113 | ||||||
Daniel Skjeldam (Chief Commercial Officer) | 1 035 | 13 | 1 047 | 76 | ||||||
Gunnar Martinsen (Senior Vice President HR and Organisation) | 715 | 24 | 739 | 127 | ||||||
Anne Grete Ellingsen (Senior Vice President Corporate Communications) | 859 | 15 | 874 | 133 | ||||||
Total executive management | 0 | 7 392 | 0 | 467 | 7 859 | 826 | ||||
*) For the employee representatives in the Board of Directors, only their fee for serving on the Board of Directors fee is stated. | ||||||||||
**) Other benefits include company car, telephone, internet etc. | ||||||||||
***) Pension expense reflects paid pension premium less employee contribution | ||||||||||
Shares and options owned by Senior Managers are presented in note 15. | ||||||||||
There are no outstanding loans or guarantees made to the Board of Directors or the Executive Management. | ||||||||||
Audit remuneration (excl VAT) | ||||||||||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||
Audit fee | 1 294 | 1 126 | ||||||||
Other audit related services | 2 738 | 422 | ||||||||
Tax advisory | 534 | 588 | ||||||||
Other services | 221 | 79 | ||||||||
Total | 4 787 | 2 215 | ||||||||
Note 8 | Net financial items | ||||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | |||
Interest income | 23 206 | 39 427 | |||
Interest expense | -20 933 | -9 880 | |||
Net foreign exchange (loss) or gain | 39 311 | -31 377 | |||
Appreciation cash equivalents | 6 127 | -310 | |||
Fair value adjustment long term deposits | 152 | 122 | |||
Hedge inefficiency | 0 | 358 264 | |||
Other financial items | 110 | -4 279 | |||
Net financial items | 47 974 | 351 966 | |||
Foreign exchange derivatives and fuel derivatives classified as financial assets or financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are measured at fair value at each balance sheet date with changes in fair value recognized as other gains and losses within operating expenses. | |||||
Non interest bearing deposits for aircraft leases are classified at fair value and a periodic interest income is calculated using the same interest rate as for fair value calculation, according to IAS 39.43. | |||||
The hedge inefficiency in 2008 is related to the foreign exchange hedge in USD on the purchase contract on 42 new Boeing 737-800. The arrangement was designated as fair value hedge accounting for a period, according to IAS 39 – Financial instruments. See note 20 for details. | |||||
Note 9 | Tax | ||||||||
This year's tax expense consists of (NOK 1 000): | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Tax payable | 111 158 | 267 | |||||||
Tax paid in current year on current year income | 1 241 | 787 | |||||||
Change in deferred tax | 64 390 | 340 | |||||||
Income tax expense | 176 789 | 1 394 | |||||||
Reconciliation from nominal to effective tax rate: | |||||||||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Profit before tax | 623 040 | 5 339 | |||||||
Expected tax expense using nominal tax rate (28 %) | 174 451 | 1 495 | |||||||
Tax effect of the following items: | |||||||||
Non deductible expenses | -487 | -2 694 | |||||||
Adjustments from previous year | 6 874 | 0 | |||||||
Tax rate outside Norway other than 28% | -4 051 | 2 474 | |||||||
Other items | 0 | 118 | |||||||
Tax expense | 176 789 | 1 394 | |||||||
Effective tax rate | 28.38% | 26.10% | |||||||
The following table details deferred tax assets and liabilities; | |||||||||
Deferred tax | Assets 2009 | Liabilities 2009 | Assets 2008 | Liabilities 2008 | |||||
Intangible assets | 0 | -4 533 | 0 | -8 584 | |||||
Tangible assets | 0 | -5 965 | 0 | -15 298 | |||||
Long term receivables and borrowings in foreign currency | 0 | -16 853 | 0 | 0 | |||||
Inventories | 0 | 1 167 | 0 | 0 | |||||
Receivables | -13 | 20 071 | 653 | 9 693 | |||||
Financial instruments | 0 | -6 289 | 0 | 23 974 | |||||
Derferred gains/losses | 0 | 35 | 0 | 44 | |||||
Other accruals | 0 | 29 980 | 0 | 29 715 | |||||
Pensions | 0 | 27 316 | 0 | 17 308 | |||||
Other temporary differences | 0 | -62 736 | 0 | -70 934 | |||||
Loss carried forward | 170 | 0 | 59 107 | 4 387 | |||||
Gross deferred tax assets and liabilities | 157 | -17 806 | 59 759 | -9 695 | |||||
Reconciliation of deferred tax assets and liabilities | Assets 2009 | Liabilities 2009 | Assets 2008 | Liabilities 2008 | |||||
Recognized at 1 January | 59 759 | -9 695 | 61 317 | -19 470 | |||||
Charged/credited to the income statement | -54 179 | -10 211 | -3 404 | 3 063 | |||||
Changes in tax rate in Sweden | 0 | 0 | 1 920 | 554 | |||||
Charged directly to equity | 0 | 2 109 | 0 | 6 870 | |||||
Translation differences | -5 422 | -9 | -75 | -712 | |||||
Recognized at 31 December | 157 | -17 806 | 59 759 | -9 695 | |||||
The Group has recognized MNOK 0.2 as a deferred tax asset in 2009. Deferred tax asset is based on unused tax loss carry forwards and temporary differences in assets and liabilities. The tax loss carried forward is expected to be utilized by future taxable profits. Deferred tax liability is based on allocation of purchase price of Norwegian Air Shuttle Sweden AB to fair values, as well as temporary differences in assets and liabilities. | |||||||||
Note 10 | Intangible assets | |||||||
Other intangible assets | ||||||||
NOK 1 000 | Software | Goodwill | Indefinite life | Definite life | Total | |||
Acquisition costs 1 January 2008 | 79 112 | 116 453 | 22 715 | 64 964 | 283 244 | |||
Additions | 29 392 | 0 | 0 | 4 022 | 33 414 | |||
Adjusted purchase price (note 25) | 0 | -21 509 | 0 | 0 | -21 509 | |||
Translation differences | 0 | 6 909 | 1 383 | 4 932 | 13 225 | |||
Acquisition costs 31 December 2008 | 108 504 | 101 853 | 24 098 | 73 919 | 308 374 | |||
Acquisition costs 1 January 2009 | 108 504 | 101 853 | 24 098 | 73 919 | 308 374 | |||
Additions | 43 660 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43 660 | |||
Translation differences | 0 | -7 695 | -1 692 | -715 | -10 103 | |||
Acquisition costs 31 December 2009 | 152 164 | 94 157 | 22 406 | 73 203 | 341 932 | |||
Accumulated amortization 1 January 2008 | 44 419 | 0 | 0 | 6 418 | 50 837 | |||
Amortization | 17 293 | 0 | 0 | 27 345 | 44 638 | |||
Impairment | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 097 | 12 097 | |||
Translation differences | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 728 | 2 728 | |||
Accumulated amortization 31 December 2008 | 61 712 | 0 | 0 | 48 588 | 110 300 | |||
Accumulated amortization 1 January 2009 | 61 712 | 0 | 0 | 48 588 | 110 300 | |||
Amortization | 23 013 | 0 | 0 | 16 436 | 39 449 | |||
Translation differences | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 637 | 1 637 | |||
Accumulated amortization 31 December 2009 | 84 725 | 0 | 0 | 66 661 | 151 386 | |||
Book value at 31 December 2008 | 46 792 | 101 853 | 24 098 | 25 331 | 198 074 | |||
Book value at 31 December 2009 | 67 438 | 94 157 | 22 406 | 6 543 | 190 543 | |||
Useful life | 3-5 years | Indefinite | Indefinite | See below | ||||
Amortization plan | Linear | None | None | Linear | ||||
Capitalized software is related to external consulting fees for the development of Norwegian's own systems for booking and ticket-less travel, various sales portals, back office and new maintenance system (AMOS). These costs are amortized over their estimated useful lives (three to five years). | ||||||||
Other intangible assets and goodwill are related to the purchase of Norwegian Air Shuttle Sweden AB on 31 July 2007. Other intangible assets from business combinations consist of estimated fair value of brand name, charter operations, slots and the Air Operating Certificate. Other intangible assets also consist of intellectual property rights which are related to purchases of internet domains. The Group has developed web portals in Norway, Sweden and Denmark. | ||||||||
Goodwill, slots and intellectual property rights are determined to have indefinite economic lives, and are not amortized. Slots and intellectual property rights do not expire over time, as long as management has the intention to continue using the slots. | ||||||||
Brand name, charter operations and air operating certificate have definite lives and are amortized over their economic useful lives. Charter operations are defined to have an economic life of 15 months from the date of purchase, and the fair value of the asset is amortized linear over 15 months. Brand name was initially defined to have indefinite economic life. However, due to restructuring and rebranding during 1st quarter of 2008, brand name from the acquisition was impaired. An impairment loss of MNOK 12 was recognized in profit or loss at 31 March 2008. At the same time, brand name was defined to have a definite economic life of 12 months from the date of impairment. Remaining fair value of the asset at 31 March 2008 is amortized linear over 12 months. Air Operating Certificate was also defined to have indefinite life at the date of acquisition. However, due to restructuring of the Swedish operations, the Air Operating Certificate was assessed to have a definite life of 12 months starting from 1 March 2009. Charter operations and brand name were fully amortized in 2009. | ||||||||
Impairment testing of goodwill and intangible assets | ||||||||
The Group tests goodwill and assets with indefinite useful lives annually at year end for impairment. Intangible assets with definite lives are tested for impairment if indicators of impairment are identified. | ||||||||
The method used to estimate the recoverable amount is value in use, based on discounted cash flow analysis. The analysis reflects the cash flow projections in the financial business plan covering the next year approved by Senior Management. In addition, the calculation includes estimated cash flows for the next 5 years. Key assumptions used in the calculation are growth rates, operating costs, terminal value and discount rate. Cash flow beyond the 5 year period is extrapolated with a long term growth rate. Estimated cash flow and discount rate is after tax. | ||||||||
Discount rate | ||||||||
The discount rate used is 11.6% and is based on Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC). The cost of the Group's debt and equity capital, weighted accordingly to reflect its capital structure, gives its weighted average cost of capital. The WACC rates used to discount the future cash flows are based on market risk free interest rate adjusted for inflation differential and also take into account the debt premium, market risk premium, gearing corporate tax rate and asset beta. An increase of the discount rate by 1% will not result in impairment of goodwill. | ||||||||
Growth rates | ||||||||
The basis for determining future growth rate is next year management approved budget, and an estimated sales growth rate based on planned production increase, expansion of route portfolio and expected increase in market share. | ||||||||
Operating costs | ||||||||
The operating costs are estimated based on the budget period and on estimated future development. Consideration is taken to committed operations efficiency programs, and the planned operating expansion. Changes in the outcome of these initiatives may affect future estimated operating costs. A permanent increase of 1% of total costs, with all other assumptions remaining equal, will not result in impairment of assets. | ||||||||
Terminal value | ||||||||
A growth rate of 2% is used in determining cash flow beyond the 5 year period. | ||||||||
Sensitivity | ||||||||
At 31 December 2009, the value in use of the Group was significantly higher than the carrying amount of its goodwill and intangible assets. The impairment calculation is not particularly sensitive to changes in assumptions. | ||||||||
Note 11 | Tangible assets | |||||||
NOK 1 000 | Buildings | Aircraft, parts and installations on leased aircraft | Prepayment Boeing contract | Equipment and fixtures | Financial lease | Total | ||
Acquisition cost at 1 January 2008 | 3 933 | 300 914 | 316 546 | 60 619 | 0 | 682 013 | ||
Additions | 0 | 373 327 | 388 619 | 20 106 | 0 | 782 052 | ||
Disposals | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Acquisition cost at 31 December 2008 | 3 933 | 674 242 | 705 165 | 80 725 | 0 | 1 464 065 | ||
Acquisition cost at 1 January 2009 | 3 933 | 674 242 | 705 165 | 80 725 | 0 | 1 464 065 | ||
Additions | 0 | 546 073 | 705 827 | 19 606 | 26 468 | 1 297 974 | ||
Disposals | 0 | -16 557 | 0 | -238 | 0 | -16 795 | ||
Acquisition cost at 31 December 2009 | 3 933 | 1 203 758 | 1 410 992 | 100 093 | 26 468 | 2 745 244 | ||
Accumulated depreciation at 1 January 2008 | 0 | 91 095 | 0 | 36 306 | 0 | 127 401 | ||
Depreciation and impairment | 0 | 59 471 | 0 | 13 406 | 0 | 72 877 | ||
Reversals | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Accumulated depreciation at 31 December 2008 | 0 | 150 566 | 0 | 49 533 | 0 | 200 278 | ||
Accumulated depreciation at 1 January 2009 | 0 | 150 566 | 0 | 49 533 | 0 | 200 099 | ||
Depreciation and impairment | 0 | 89 281 | 0 | 19 776 | 376 | 109 433 | ||
Reversals | 0 | -10 981 | 0 | -121 | 0 | -11 102 | ||
Accumulated depreciation at 31 December 2009 | 0 | 228 866 | 0 | 69 188 | 376 | 298 430 | ||
Book value at 31 December 2008 | 3 933 | 523 676 | 705 165 | 31 014 | 0 | 1 263 787 | ||
Book value at 31 December 2009 | 3 933 | 974 892 | 1 410 992 | 30 905 | 26 092 | 2 446 814 | ||
Estimated useful life, depreciation plan and residual value is as follows: | ||||||||
Useful life | See below | See below | See below | 3-9 years | 4-20 years | |||
Depreciation plan | See below | Linear | See below | Linear | Linear | |||
Residual value | 100% | See below | See below | 0% | 0% | |||
At 31 December 2009, the Group operated a total of 46 aircraft: 7 owned and 39 leased under operational leases. Operational leases are detailed in note 12. | ||||||||
Aircraft | ||||||||
The group acquired 2 Boeing 737-800 NG aircraft during 2009. Aircraft is decomposed and depreciated over the economic useful life of each component on a straight-line basis. The body of the aircraft is depreciated based on economic useful years, while other components are based on airborne hours and cycles. | ||||||||
The residual value is MNOK 206.1 in total for all owned aircraft and deducted from the depreciable amount of the body of the aircraft. The life expectancy of the body of the aircraft is 25 years on 737-800 and 30 years on 737-300, and the economic life of the owned aircraft is 25 or 30 years less the age of the aircraft at time of purchase. | ||||||||
Installations on leased aircraft | ||||||||
The installations on the leased aircraft include cabin interior modifications and other improvements to the aircraft after lease commencement. The capitalized value is depreciated over the remainder of the aircraft lease, which is between 1-8 years. Linear depreciation is applied and residual value is NOK 0. In 2009 several engines on the leased aircraft were in overhaul, and replacement costs for life limited parts were capitalized in the extent that the costs were improvements to the engines exceeding the requirements specified in the leasing contracts. These components are depreciated at a defined rate per engine cycle, limited to the remainder of the aircraft lease. | ||||||||
Spare parts | ||||||||
Spare parts consist of rotable and repairable parts for aircraft and are depreciated over their useful life. Useful life of spare parts is between 4-10 years. Linear depreciation is applied and 25% of the acquisition cost is calculated as residual value. | ||||||||
Buildings | ||||||||
Buildings consist of 3 apartments in Berlin, purchased in 2007 for the purpose of housing crew and trainees stationed in Berlin on temporary basis. The asset is carried at acquisition cost. The residual value is estimated to equal the acquisition cost. | ||||||||
Prepayments on Boeing contract | ||||||||
In 2007, the Group entered into a purchase contract on 42 new 737-800 aircraft with Boeing Corporation, with an option on 42 additional aircraft. Two aircraft have been delivered in 2009, and 6 purchase options have been exercised. 46 aircraft will be delivered i between 2010 and 2014. Until delivery of the aircraft, the Group will make prepayments to Boeing, following a defined prepayment schedule. The Group capitalizes borrowing costs incurred for the construction of qualifying assets during the period of time that is required to complete the aircraft. Borrowing costs of MNOK 33.5 (2008: MNOK 30.5) have been capitalized during the year. Average capitalization rate of 7.66% (2007: 8.21%) was used. The Group applied fair value hedge accounting of unrecognized firm commitment for the three first quarters of 2008. The hedging relationship was terminated at 16 October 2008. The remaining fair value of the unrecognized firm commitment of MNOK 8.7 at the date of termination was capitalized as a part of the prepayments. Prepayments are not depreciated until the aircraft is delivered and ready to use. The value of prepayments is tested for impairment annually. | ||||||||
Financial lease asset | ||||||||
In 2009, the Group entered into lease agreements related to de-ice equipment and electronic flight bag equipment. The lease agreements are classified as financial leases as all risks and rewards are transferred to the Group after the end of the lease agreement. The financial lease assets are depreciated over their economic useful lives. De-ice equipment is depreciated over 20 years, while electronic flight bag equipment is depreciated over 4 years. Residual value of financial lease assets is 0. | ||||||||
Impairment of tangible assets | ||||||||
In 2009 and 2008 the management determined that the total operations of the Group were its cash generating unit, and as such, there is only one operational segment in the Group. Impairment testing of tangible assets are covered by impairment testing on the whole Group, see note 10 for details. | ||||||||
No impairment losses have been recognized in 2009. | ||||||||
For information regarding assets pledged as collateral for debt, see note 23. | ||||||||
Note 12 | Operating leases | |||||||||||
The lease agreements for the Boeing 737 aircraft vary between 3 to 8 years with an option to prolong certain agreements. 6 of the aircraft were delivered in 2002, 2 aircraft in 2003, 4 aircraft in 2004, 2 aircraft in 2005, 6 aircraft in 2006, 2 aircraft in 2007, 8 aircraft in 2008 and 9 aircraft in 2009. Renegotiations have resulted in prolonging some of the short-term leases. The contracts for 5 of the aircraft expire in 2010 and for 8 of the aircraft in 2011. The remaining contracts expire in 2012 or later. | ||||||||||||
Leasing costs expensed on aircraft lease within operational expenses was MNOK 574.0 in 2009 (2008: MNOK 426.6) | ||||||||||||
In addition, the Group leases 13 cars, and 9 properties in Oslo, Stavanger, Stockholm, Copenhagen and Warsaw. Leasing costs related to cars and properties expensed in other operating expenses in 2009 was MNOK 21.2 (MNOK 19.1 in 2008) | ||||||||||||
Annual minimum rent on non-cancellable operating lease agreements: | ||||||||||||
Nominal value 2009 | Nominal value 2008 | |||||||||||
NOK 1 000 | Aircraft | Cars | Property | Total | Aircraft | Cars | Property | Total | ||||
Within one year | 887 912 | 3 910 | 17 082 | 908 905 | 613 824 | 560 | 18 466 | 632 850 | ||||
Between 1 and 5 years | 2 448 487 | 14 220 | 36 668 | 2 499 375 | 1 509 123 | 498 | 63 326 | 1 572 947 | ||||
After 5 years | 724 171 | 7 110 | 13 233 | 744 513 | 552 286 | 0 | 19 849 | 572 134 | ||||
The aircraft's minimum lease payments consist of ordinary lease payments, contractual payments for maintenance reserves and expensed deferred lease payments resulting from non interest bearing deposits paid at inception of lease agreement. | ||||||||||||
Note 13 | Trade and other Receivables | |||
Spesification of receivables | ||||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | ||
Trade receivables | 87 533 | 121 808 | ||
Credit card receivables | 435 773 | 424 054 | ||
Deposits | 60 211 | 71 493 | ||
Deferred leasing costs | 3 491 | 8 539 | ||
Prepaid costs | 20 376 | 19 041 | ||
Public duty debt | 88 698 | 57 025 | ||
Reimbursements claims maintenance costs | 131 786 | 222 524 | ||
Other claims | 9 985 | 5 937 | ||
Costs to be reinvoiced | 11 | 63 | ||
Prepayments to employees | 1 109 | 418 | ||
Prepaid rent | 17 311 | 15 880 | ||
Total | 856 284 | 946 783 | ||
Due dates | ||||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | ||
Within one year | 829 893 | 914 379 | ||
After 1 year | 26 391 | 32 403 | ||
Total | 856 284 | 946 783 | ||
Currency (NOK 1 000) | 2009 | 2008 | ||
DKK | 30 698 | 8 021 | ||
EUR | 62 159 | 10 425 | ||
GBP | 14 610 | 2 428 | ||
NOK | 457 557 | 561 050 | ||
USD | 212 303 | 306 449 | ||
SEK | 72 390 | 58 331 | ||
PLN | 6 567 | 78 | ||
Fair value of trade and other receivables | ||||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | ||
Due within one year | 829 893 | 914 379 | ||
After one year *) | 22 706 | 28 631 | ||
Total | 852 600 | 943 010 | ||
For receivables due within one year, fair value is equal to nominal value. | ||||
*) Discount rate 5.5 % | ||||
Provision for bad debt | ||||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | ||
Balance 1 January | 30 269 | 8 723 | ||
Utilized | -2 775 | -4 487 | ||
Accruals | 23 972 | 28 217 | ||
Reversals | -19 810 | -2 184 | ||
Balance 31 December | 31 655 | 30 269 | ||
Changes in provision for bad debt is recognized as other operating expenses. | ||||
Overdue accounts receivables | ||||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | ||
Overdue less than 3 months | 14 068 | 39 426 | ||
Overdue 3-6 months | 6 746 | 431 | ||
Overdue over 6 months | 11 711 | 14 134 | ||
Total | 32 525 | 53 991 | ||
The majority of accounts receivable overdue is by reason of slow processing of accounts payable with some of our customers, and is not related to any problems with the ability or willingness to pay. Most of the overdue receivables are to handling agents which are also our suppliers. | ||||
Maximum exposure to credit risk at 31 December 2009 is MNOK 655.1 (2008: MNOK 768.4). | ||||
The Group has deposits as collateral for the Group’s liabilities to suppliers. See note 24 for details on restricted cash. | ||||
Non interest bearing deposits are measured at amortized cost in the balance sheet. Deposits denominated in foreign currency are converted using the prevailing exchange rates on the balance sheet date. | ||||
Note 14 | Inventories | ||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | |
Consumables | 26 183 | 22 149 | |
Modification equipment | 5 745 | 8 483 | |
Parts for heavy maintenance | 7 917 | 3 581 | |
Other inventory | 980 | 0 | |
Total | 40 825 | 34 214 | |
In 2009 and 2008 the Group bought parts removed from aircraft engines in relation to heavy maintenance. These parts are held for sale, and sold in secondary markets. Charges for obsolete product in 2009 were MNOK 4.6 (2008: MNOK 0). | |||
Note 15 | Equity and shareholder information | ||||||||
At 31 December 2009 the share capital consists of the following share classes; | |||||||||
2009 | 2008 | ||||||||
Issued shares | 34 209 858 | 32 359 778 | |||||||
Net Shares | 34 209 858 | 32 359 778 | |||||||
There is only one class of shares, and all shares have equal rights. Par value per share is NOK 0.1 | |||||||||
Number of shares (thousands) | Ordinary shares | Share premium | Total | ||||||
01 January 2008 | 20 866 | 2 087 | 408 277 | 410 364 | |||||
Share issue 5 August 2008 | 11 494 | 1 149 | 380 853 | 382 002 | |||||
31 December 2008 | 32 360 | 3 236 | 789 130 | 792 366 | |||||
Share issue 2 November 2009 | 230 | 23 | 7 353 | 7 376 | |||||
Share issue 18 November 2009 | 1 620 | 162 | 245 514 | 245 676 | |||||
31 December 2009 | 34 210 | 3 421 | 1 041 997 | 1 045 418 | |||||
All issued shares are fully paid with a par value of 0.1 NOK per share (2008: 0.1 NOK per share). The share issue at 2 November 2009 was related to exercise of employee share options with an exercise price of NOK 32.06. For additional information about the employee share options, see note 17. | |||||||||
Description of items booked directly on shareholders equity: | |||||||||
Translation differences | |||||||||
MNOK -5.0 has been booked as comprehensive income at 31 December 2009 (2008: MNOK 1.3). The translation differences arise from consolidating the subsidiaries Norwegian Air Shuttle Polska SP.zo.o and Norwegian Air Shuttle Sweden AB into Group accounts. | |||||||||
Expenses for share issue | |||||||||
Expenses for share issue, net of tax, in the amount of MNOK 5.4 (2008: MNOK 17.9) have been booked directly in shareholder equity. | |||||||||
Stock option plan | |||||||||
Stock options are granted to management and employees. In 2008 employees were granted stock options in exchange for a voluntary reduction in salary, where the first part of this option plan was exercised in November 2009. Additionally, options were granted to management in 2009, with an expiry in 2010 and 2011. See note 17 for further details. Total stock option expense in 2009 was MNOK 8.4 (2008: MNOK 6.2). | |||||||||
Shareholder structure | |||||||||
The largest shareholders at 31 December 2009 were; | |||||||||
Owner- | Voting- | ||||||||
A-shares | ship | rights | |||||||
HBK INVEST AS | 9 499 116 | 27.77% | 27.77% | ||||||
AWILCO INVEST AS | 2 320 000 | 6.78% | 6.78% | ||||||
FINNAIR PLC | 1 649 862 | 4.82% | 4.82% | ||||||
SKAGEN KON-TIKI | 1 603 900 | 4.69% | 4.69% | ||||||
SKAGEN VEKST | 1 298 700 | 3.80% | 3.80% | ||||||
DNB NOR NORGE (IV) V | 820 340 | 2.40% | 2.40% | ||||||
VITAL FORSIKRING ASA | 767 187 | 2.24% | 2.24% | ||||||
HOLBERG NORGE | 566 760 | 1.66% | 1.66% | ||||||
GOLDMAN SACHS INT. - EQUITY - | 538 580 | 1.57% | 1.57% | ||||||
HOLBERG NORDEN | 505 956 | 1.48% | 1.48% | ||||||
SEB ENKILDA ASA - EGENKAPITAL - | 406 808 | 1.19% | 1.19% | ||||||
PENSJONSKASSEN STATOIL | 392 671 | 1.15% | 1.15% | ||||||
STATE STREET BANK AN | 368 858 | 1.08% | 1.08% | ||||||
STATE STREET BANK | 339 576 | 0.99% | 0.99% | ||||||
KLP LK AKSJER | 300 000 | 0.88% | 0.88% | ||||||
WARRENWICKLUND NORGE | 247 184 | 0.72% | 0.72% | ||||||
SHB STOCKHOLM CLIENT | 222 210 | 0.65% | 0.65% | ||||||
BARCLAYS CAPITAL SEC | 200 000 | 0.58% | 0.58% | ||||||
DNB NOR SMB VPF | 198 811 | 0.58% | 0.58% | ||||||
KLP AKSJENORGE | 197 500 | 0.58% | 0.58% | ||||||
Other | 11 765 839 | 34.39% | 34.39% | ||||||
Total number of shares | 34 209 858 | 100% | 100% | ||||||
The largest shareholders at 31 December 2008 were; | |||||||||
A-shares | ship | rights | |||||||
HBK HOLDING AS | 4 909 671 | 15.17% | 15.17% | ||||||
BSB INVEST AS | 4 752 991 | 14.69% | 14.69% | ||||||
DNB NOR NORGE (IV) | 1 700 792 | 5.26% | 5.26% | ||||||
VITAL FORSIKRING ASA | 1 667 837 | 5.15% | 5.15% | ||||||
FINNAIR PLC | 1 649 862 | 5.10% | 5.10% | ||||||
OJADA AS | 1 453 986 | 4.49% | 4.49% | ||||||
SKAGEN VEKST | 1 437 678 | 4.44% | 4.44% | ||||||
AWILCO INVEST AS | 1 300 000 | 4.02% | 4.02% | ||||||
PERESTROIKA AS | 1 080 175 | 3.34% | 3.34% | ||||||
SKAGEN KON-TIKI | 1 000 000 | 3.09% | 3.09% | ||||||
ANKERLØKKEN HOLDING AS | 806 454 | 2.49% | 2.49% | ||||||
GOLDMAN SACHS INT. - EQUITY - | 683 948 | 2.11% | 2.11% | ||||||
HOLBERG NORDEN | 666 600 | 2.06% | 2.06% | ||||||
KLP LK AKSJER | 640 000 | 1.98% | 1.98% | ||||||
HOLBERG NORGE | 552 800 | 1.71% | 1.71% | ||||||
FONDSAVANSE AS | 520 459 | 1.61% | 1.61% | ||||||
VERDIPAPIRFONDET KLP AKSJENORGE | 321 400 | 0.99% | 0.99% | ||||||
AWECO INVEST AS | 321 030 | 0.99% | 0.99% | ||||||
DNB NOR SMB | 320 000 | 0.99% | 0.99% | ||||||
Other | 6 574 095 | 20.32% | 20.32% | ||||||
Total number of shares | 32 359 778 | 100% | 100% | ||||||
Shares and options directly or indirectly held by members of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and Executive Management: | |||||||||
Name | Title | Shares 1) | Options | ||||||
Bjørn Kise 2) | Chairman | 781 537 | - | ||||||
Ola Krohn Fagervoll | Board Member | 15 462 | - | ||||||
Liv Berstad | Board Member | - | - | ||||||
Marianne Wergeland Jenssen | Board Member | 800 | - | ||||||
Linda Olsen | Board Member - Employee repr | - | - | ||||||
Thor Espen Bråten | Board Member - Employee repr | 1 995 | 2 529 | ||||||
Kenneth Utsikt | Board Member - Employee repr | 1 336 | 956 | ||||||
Bjørn Kjos 3) | Chief Executive Officer | 7 998 603 | 48 052 | ||||||
Frode E Foss | Chief Financial Officer | 30 000 | 46 624 | ||||||
Hans-Petter Aanby | Chief IT Officer | - | 46 636 | ||||||
Asgeir Nyseth | Chief Operating Officer | 5 200 | 46 655 | ||||||
Daniel Skjeldam | Chief Commercial Officer | - | 43 039 | ||||||
Anne-Sissel Skånvik | Senior Vice President Corporate Communications | - | 20 000 | ||||||
Gunnar Martinsen | Senior Vice President HR and Organisation | 8 165 | 20 000 | ||||||
1) Including shares held by related parties | |||||||||
2) Bjørn Kise holds 8.2 % of HBK invest AS | |||||||||
3) Bjørn Kjos holds 84.1 % of HBK Invest AS | |||||||||
Specification of other reserves | |||||||||
Available-for-sale financial assets | Translation differences | Total | |||||||
01 January 2008 | 0 | -4 550 | -4 550 | ||||||
Available for sale financial assets | -4 376 | 0 | -4 376 | ||||||
Translation differences | 0 | 1 293 | 1 293 | ||||||
01 January 2009 | -4 376 | -3 257 | -7 633 | ||||||
Available for sale financial assets | 1 608 | 0 | 1 608 | ||||||
Translation differences | 0 | -5 007 | -5 007 | ||||||
31 December 2009 | -2 768 | -8 264 | -11 032 | ||||||
Note 16 | Earnings per share | |||
Basic earnings per share calculations are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, while diluted earnings per share calculations are performed using the average number of common shares and dilutive common shares equivalents outstanding during each period. When net earning for the year is negative, diluted earnings per share are set equal to basic earnings per share. | ||||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | ||
Profit | 446 251 | 3 944 | ||
Average number of shares outstanding | 32 499 404 | 25 526 209 | ||
Average number of shares and options outstanding | 33 463 429 | 27 089 077 | ||
Basic earnings per share | 13.73 | 0.15 | ||
Diluted earnings per share | 13.34 | 0.15 | ||
2 009 | 2 008 | |||
Average number of shares outstanding | 32 499 404 | 25 526 209 | ||
Dilutional effects | ||||
Stock options | 964 025 | 0 | ||
Average number of shares outstanding adjusted for dilutional effects | 33 463 429 | 25 526 209 | ||
In 2008, underwritten rights issues of 11,494,252 new shares were issued by the parent company at a subscription price of NOK 34.8 per share, with subscription rights for shareholders as of end of 5 August 2008. The subscription price was set at 30% discount to the volume weighted average trading price on Oslo Stock Exchange during the last five trading days prior to the day of the extraordinary general meeting. The bonus in subscription price is reflected in basic earnings per share. An adjustment factor of 1.075 is used in the calculation. | ||||
Note 17 | Options | |||||||||
On 24 October 2007 the Board issued, in accordance with the authorization from the general meeting on 3 May 2007, 269,000 stock options to the company management team. The stock options had an exercise price of NOK 173.07. All options expired in 2009. | ||||||||||
The Board issued 561,301 stock options to employees on 10 September 2008 in accordance with the authorization from the extraordinary general meeting on 5 August 2008. The stock options have an exercise price of NOK 32.06, equal to the 30% discounted volume weighted share price during the period 26-29 August 2008. The stock options vested 1 October 2009, and may be exercised within a period of two years. The first 50% of the stock options can be exercised during determined periods of exercise. The second 50% of the stock options can be exercised only after the third quarter financial report for 2010. Stock options which are not exercised within 31 October 2010 will expire. | ||||||||||
On 20 July 2009 the Board issued, in accordance with the authorization from the general meeting, 384,000 stock options to the management and key personnel. The stock options have an exercise price of NOK 67.00, equal to the average share price the last trading days before issue, plus 10%. The stock options may be exercised within a period of two years and 3 months, whereas the first 50% of the stock options may be exercised one year after grant date and vest 20 July 2010, and the second 50% of the stock options may be exercised two years after grant date. | ||||||||||
The stock option program is expensed at fair value over the vesting period. Fair value calculations are conducted using Black & Scholes option pricing model. | ||||||||||
There are no market conditions linked to the vesting of the options. The fair value of the options is expensed linear over the vesting period. The cost is offset in other paid in capital. | ||||||||||
The following estimates are used in calculating fair value; | ||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
Dividend (%) | 0% | 0% | ||||||||
Expected volatility (%) | 58.01% | 54.69% | ||||||||
Historic volatility (%) | 58.01% | 54.69% | ||||||||
Risk free interest (%) | 2.13% | 5.86% | ||||||||
Expected lifetime (year) | 2.25 | 1.12 | ||||||||
Share price at grant date | 59.50 | 39.00 | ||||||||
Expected lifetime assumes that stock options are exercised at expiration. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility over the most recent period that corresponds with the expected life of the option. There is a cap on the options granted in 2009 limiting the proceeds from the options to three times the participants' annual base salary. Furthermore, the participants in the 2008 - program must cover the social security tax incurred for option gains where the share price exceeds NOK 64.12. These limitations are taken into account when calculating the option values. | ||||||||||
The option program is expensed with MNOK 8.4 in 2009 and MNOK 6.2 in 2008. | ||||||||||
2009 | Weighted avg. | 2008 | Weighted avg. | |||||||
Shares | exerc. Price | Shares | exerc. Price | |||||||
Outstanding at the beginning of the period | 829 690 | 77.7 | 269 000 | 173.1 | ||||||
Allocated | 384 000 | 67.0 | 561 301 | 32.1 | ||||||
Exercised | 230 080 | 32.1 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Terminated | 4 009 | 32.1 | 611 | 32.1 | ||||||
Forfeited | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Expired | 269 000 | 173.1 | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Vested options | 48 290 | 32.1 | 134 500 | 173.1 | ||||||
Weighted average of fair value of options allocated in the period | 384 000 | 15.4 | 561 301 | 13.3 | ||||||
Outstanding at the end of the period | 710 601 | 50.9 | 829 690 | 77.8 | ||||||
2009 | Outstanding options | Vested options | ||||||||
Strike price (NOK) | Outstanding options by 31 December 2009 | Weighted average remaining lifetime (yrs) | Weighted average strike price | Vested options by 31 December 2009 | Weighted average strike price | |||||
0.00 - 35.00 | 326 601 | 0.8 | 32.1 | 48 290 | 32.1 | |||||
35.00 - | 384 000 | 1.8 | 67.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
Total | 710 601 | 1.4 | 50.9 | 48 290 | 32.1 | |||||
2008 | Outstanding options | Vested options | ||||||||
Strike price (NOK) | Outstanding options by 31 December 2008 | Weighted average remaining lifetime (yrs) | Weighted average strike price | Vested options by 31 December 2008 | Weighted average strike price | |||||
0.00 – 100.00 | 560 690 | 1.83 | 32.1 | 0 | 0 | |||||
100.00 – 200.00 | 269 000 | 0.8 | 173.1 | 134 500 | 173.1 | |||||
Total | 829 690 | 1.5 | 77.8 | 134 500 | 173.1 | |||||
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has implemented a share purchase savings program for the employees, where the employees, by deductions in salary, purchase shares in the parent company and the company will fund up to 50% of the purchased shares, limited to NOK 6000 per year. In addition the company will distribute bonus shares depending on the total amount of purchased shares per employee. | ||||||||||
Fair value of the bonus shares are measured at the date of grant using Black & Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of the bonus shares and the corresponding estimated social security cost are expensed as personnel costs over the vesting period. Changes in estimated social security cost are expensed over the remaining vesting period. At 31 December 2009, MNOK 0.2 (2008: MNOK 0.2) was expensed related to the bonus share scheme. | ||||||||||
Note 18 | Pensions | ||||||||
Defined contribution plan | |||||||||
Norwegian Air Shuttle Sweden AB's post employment benefits consist of both defined contribution plans and defined benefit plans. Under a defined contribution plan, the Company’s only obligation is to pay a fixed premium to a separate entity (a fund), and will have no obligation to pay further contributions if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to pay all employee benefits. The related actuarial and investment risks fall on the employee. The expenditures for defined contribution plans are recognized as costs during the period when the employee provides service. Under a defined benefit plan it is the Company’s obligation to provide agreed benefits to current and former employees. The related actuarial and investment risks fall on the Company. | |||||||||
The pension plans of certain employees are secured through insurance at Alecta. Alecta has not been able to produce the necessary information that Swedish companies need to account for defined benefit plans according to IAS 19. These pension plans are therefore accounted for as defined contribution plans. | |||||||||
For the defined contribution plans Norwegian Air Shuttle Sweden AB pays premiums to public or private administrative pension plans on mandatory, contractual or voluntary basis. The Company has no further obligations once these premiums are paid. The premiums are accounted for as personnel expenses once paid. Pre-paid premiums are accounted for as an asset to the extent that future benefits can be determined as plausible. | |||||||||
A total of 108 employees were included in the pension plan at 31 December 2009 (2008: 140). Total pension costs expensed in profit or loss in 2009 was MNOK 12.2 (2008: MNOK 16.4) | |||||||||
Defined benefit plan | |||||||||
All employees in Norway participate in a defined benefit plan. The benefits are mainly dependent on pension entitlement earned, salary at the time of retirement and the size of payments from the National Insurance. The liabilities are covered through Vital AS. The plan also covers a life insurance and disability insurance. Per 31 December 2009, a total of 1,465 employees were active members (2008: 1,238), and 30 (2008: 24) were on pension retirement. In addition, employees are included in the early retirement scheme (AFP), which is an unfunded plan for retirement right at the age of 62. The AFP is a multi-employer plan, where the Norwegian state pays a contribution of 40% of paid pensions for the retired persons older than 64 years. The Group payments of contribution to the plan are recognized as an expense in the income statement as incurred. The Group also pays 25% of the pension paid to own pensioners. This is an obligation for the Group that is not funded. The AFP obligation for the Group is shown under the heading "unfunded". At 31 December 2009, 495 employees were active in the AFP pension plan (2008:421), and no employees had retired in the AFP pension plan. | |||||||||
The Scheme is in compliance with the act on occupational pensions. | |||||||||
The pension obligation is calculated on linear accumulation. Changes in the obligation due to changes in and deviations from the estimated assumptions, are spread over the estimated average remaining vesting period for the part of deviations that exceeds 10% of the gross pension liability. Pension costs for the year for the Groups defined benefit plans are calculated by independent actuaries and are based on information as of 1 January 2009. Management has made an assessment of changes in estimates and basis of calculation, these changes have no material impact on the pension cost for 2009. However, in 2008, estimated number of employees at 1 January 2008 was significantly lower than the actual number of employees in 2008. The deviation resulted in an additional pension expense in 2008 of MNOK 22.8 (incl employer’s contribution). | |||||||||
Risk tables for death and disability are based on the most commonly used statistics in Norway, (K-2005) and (IR 02) respectively. | |||||||||
Pension expense (NOK 1 000) | Funded | Unfunded | Total 2009 | Total 2008 | |||||
Net present value of benefits earned | 102 828 | 518 | 103 346 | 90 271 | |||||
Interest cost on pension liability | 14 598 | 76 | 14 674 | 11 111 | |||||
Return on plan assets | -15 594 | 0 | -15 594 | -11 459 | |||||
Administrative expenses | 2 485 | 0 | 2 485 | 0 | |||||
Recognized actuarial gains/losses | 6 554 | 27 | 6 581 | 1 895 | |||||
Social security tax | 14 709 | 84 | 14 793 | 12 679 | |||||
Net pension expense defined benefit plans | 125 580 | 705 | 126 285 | 104 497 | |||||
Pension expense on defined contribution plans | 12 200 | 16 397 | |||||||
Total pension expense | 138 485 | 120 894 | |||||||
Defined benefit liability and fund (NOK 1 000) | |||||||||
2009 | 2008 | ||||||||
Funded | Unfunded | Total | Funded | Unfunded | Total | ||||
Change in present value of defined benefit liability: | |||||||||
Gross pension liability 01.01 | 394 094 | 2 029 | 396 123 | 248 228 | 1 173 | 249 401 | |||
Current service costs | 102 828 | 518 | 103 346 | 89 860 | 411 | 90 271 | |||
Interest cost | 14 598 | 76 | 14 674 | 11 058 | 53 | 11 111 | |||
Actuarial gains/losses | -25 314 | 42 | -25 272 | 49 948 | 392 | 50 340 | |||
Benefits paid | -5 150 | 0 | -5 150 | -5 000 | 0 | -5 000 | |||
Gross pension liability 31.12 | 481 056 | 2 665 | 483 721 | 394 094 | 2 029 | 396 123 | |||
Change in fair value of plan assets: | |||||||||
Fair value of pension assets 01.01 | 233 000 | 0 | 233 000 | 175 000 | 0 | 175 000 | |||
Expected return | 15 594 | 0 | 15 594 | -6 150 | 0 | -6 150 | |||
Actuarial gains/losses | -28 148 | 0 | -28 148 | 2 549 | 0 | 2 549 | |||
Administrative expenses | -2 485 | 0 | -2 485 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Contributions paid | 88 801 | 0 | 88 801 | 66 601 | 0 | 66 601 | |||
Benefits paid | -5 150 | 0 | -5 150 | -5 000 | 0 | -5 000 | |||
Fair value of plan assets 31.12 | 301 612 | 0 | 301 612 | 233 000 | 0 | 233 000 | |||
Net pension liability | 179 444 | 2 665 | 182 109 | 161 094 | 2 029 | 163 123 | |||
Unrecognized actuarial gains/losses | -98 189 | -473 | -98 662 | -123 748 | -561 | -124 309 | |||
Social security tax | 13 844 | 267 | 14 111 | 22 714 | 286 | 23 000 | |||
Net recognized pension liability 31.12 | 95 099 | 2 459 | 97 558 | 60 060 | 1 754 | 61 815 | |||
2009 | 2008 | ||||||||
Actual return on pension funds *) | 5.40% | 0.30% | |||||||
Expected contribution to be paid next year | 83 300 | 80 000 | |||||||
Expected benefits to be paid next year | 5 163 | 5 150 | |||||||
*) actual return on pension funds is based on reported amounts per first quarter each year | |||||||||
The net pension liability is based on several assumptions. The discount rate is based on long term government bonds in Norway, with adjustments for duration. The pension liability’s average duration is 25 years. Wage adjustments, pension adjustments and the expected growth in state pensions are based on historical observations for the Group, and an expected long term inflation rate of 2.5 %. | |||||||||
2009 | 2008 | ||||||||
Discount rate | 4.4% | 3.8% | |||||||
Expected return on pension funds | 5.6% | 5.8% | |||||||
Wage adjustments | 4.0% | 3.8% | |||||||
Increase of social security base amount (G) | 4.0% | 3.8% | |||||||
Future pension increase | 1.3% | 1.8% | |||||||
Average turnover | 2-10 % | 0-10 % | |||||||
The Groups pension fund is invested in the following instruments: | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Equity | 9.8% | 24.8% | |||||||
Bonds | 19.0% | 21.5% | |||||||
Money market funds | 16.3% | 7.5% | |||||||
Hold-to maturity bonds | 36.4% | 27.7% | |||||||
Real estate | 16.6% | 15.6% | |||||||
Various | 1.2% | 2.9% | |||||||
The table shows actual distribution of plan assets at 30 September 2009 and at 31 December 2008. | |||||||||
Historical information | |||||||||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | ||||
Present value of defined benefit obligation | 483 721 | 396 123 | 249 401 | 185 325 | 152 752 | ||||
Fair value of plan assets | 301 612 | 233 000 | 175 000 | 137 516 | 99 714 | ||||
Deficit/(surplus) in the plan | 182 109 | 163 123 | 74 401 | 47 809 | 53 038 | ||||
Experience adjustments on plan liabilities | -25 272 | 50 340 | 19 506 | -1 646 | 24 346 | ||||
Experience adjustments on plan assets | -28 148 | 2 549 | -2 375 | 3 039 | -1 972 | ||||
Sensitivity | |||||||||
The sensitivity analysis shows effects on net pension liability and pension expense if the discount rate and wage adjustment used in the actuarial calculations had been 1% higher (+)/lower (-) at 1 January 2009; | |||||||||
Sensitivity analysis pensions 2009 | |||||||||
(NOK 1 000) | Discount rate | Wage adjustment | |||||||
+ 1% | - 1% | + 1% | - 1% | ||||||
Net pension liability 31 December 2009 (%) | -16% | 21% | 8% | -9% | |||||
Net pension expense 2009 (%) | -17% | 21% | 16% | -16% | |||||
Net pension liability 31 December 2009 | 81 949 | 118 046 | 105 363 | 88 778 | |||||
Net pension expense 2009 | 104 817 | 152 805 | 146 491 | 106 079 | |||||
Note 19 | Provisions | |||||||
Periodic maintenance on leased Boeing 737 and MD-80 aircraft | ||||||||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Opening balance | 114 090 | 101 042 | ||||||
Utilized | -858 976 | -313 128 | ||||||
Accruals | 877 484 | 326 175 | ||||||
Reversals | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Closing balance | 132 598 | 114 090 | ||||||
Classified as short term liabilities | 62 262 | 0 | ||||||
Classified as long term provision | 70 336 | 114 090 | ||||||
The lease contracts require the aircraft to be returned at the end of the lease term in accordance with specific redelivery conditions stated in the contract. In addition, the Group is obliged to follow the maintenance program as defined by Boeing. To meet this requirement, the Group carries out maintenance on aircraft, both regularly and at the expiration of the leasing period. The overhaul and maintenance of the aircraft is a contractual obligation under the lease. The specific event that gives rise to the obligation is each airborne hour or cycle completed by the aircraft as these determine the timing and nature of the overhaul and maintenance that must be carried out. In some of the contracts, there is a degree of uncertainty concerning which maintenance is covered by the maintenance funds, and the provision for this increase in expenses for the Group is distributed over the period until the maintenance is conducted. | ||||||||
The estimation technique for maintenance reserve contribution (MRC) accruals is based on contractual payments for maintenance and mandatory maintenance. The estimated costs of overhaul and maintenance are based on the Group’s maintenance program and contractual prices. In addition, accruals are set to meet redelivery conditions for leased aircrafts. Accruals are highly dependent on redelivery date and redelivery conditions in the different lease terms. In the case of prolonging the lease agreement, estimates on maintenance costs will be revised. | ||||||||
Parts of the periodic maintenance will be performed in 2010, and MNOK 62.4 is classified as short term liability for periodic maintenance (2008: MNOK 0). The short term part of periodic maintenance is estimated based on planned maintenance in 2010. The amounts for 2008 are not restated. | ||||||||
Sensitivity | ||||||||
An analysis of the sensitivity on the MRC accruals is shown below; | ||||||||
2009 (NOK 1 000) | 5% increased production | 5% decreased production | ||||||
MRC accruals*: | 4.20% | -4.20% | ||||||
5 569 | (5 569) | |||||||
*Based on MRC accruals 2009. Any changes in future maintenance due to increased/decreased production is not included | ||||||||
2009 (NOK 1 000) | 1 year lease extension | 1.5 year lease extension | 2 year lease extension | |||||
MRC accruals*: | 29.10% | 40.50% | 50.40% | |||||
38 586 | 53 702 | 66 830 | ||||||
*Based on MRC accruals 2009. Any changes in future maintenance due to lease extension are not included | ||||||||
Note 20 | Financial instruments | ||||||||
Financial instruments by category (NOK 1 000) | |||||||||
The accounting policies for financial instruments have been applied to the line items below (NOK 1 000): | |||||||||
31 December 2009 | 31 December 2008 | ||||||||
Assets as per balance sheet | Loans and receivables | Fair value through profit or loss | Available-for-sale | Total | Loans and receivables | Fair value through profit or loss | Available-for-sale | Total | |
Available-for-sale financial assets | 0 | 0 | 7 236 | 7 236 | 0 | 0 | 5 628 | 5 628 | |
Derivative financial instruments | 0 | 23 688 | 0 | 23 688 | 0 | 18 360 | 0 | 18 360 | |
Trade and other receivables *) | 728 779 | 0 | 0 | 728 779 | 854 355 | 0 | 0 | 854 355 | |
Cash and cash equivalents | 1 408 475 | 0 | 0 | 1 408 475 | 607 536 | 0 | 0 | 607 536 | |
Total | 2 137 253 | 23 688 | 7 236 | 2 168 177 | 1 461 891 | 18 360 | 5 628 | 1 485 878 | |
*) Prepayments not included in trade and other receivables | 127 505 | 60 024 | |||||||
31 December 2009 | 31 December 2008 | ||||||||
Liabilities per balance sheet | Fair value through profit or loss | Other financial liabilities | Total | Fair value through profit or loss | Other financial liabilities | Total | |||
Borrowings | 0 | 1 583 010 | 1 583 010 | 0 | 698 330 | 698 330 | |||
Derivative financial instruments | 1 227 | 0 | 1 227 | 104 325 | 0 | 104 325 | |||
Trade and other payables | 0 | 656 250 | 656 250 | 0 | 618 014 | 618 014 | |||
Total | 1 227 | 2 239 260 | 2 240 487 | 104 325 | 1 316 344 | 1 420 668 | |||
*) Public duties not included in trade and other payables | 90 299 | 76 818 | |||||||
See note 22 for details related to borrowings. | |||||||||
Credit quality of financial asset | |||||||||
(NOK 1 000) | |||||||||
Trade receivables | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Counterparties with external credit rating A or better | 0 | 424 054 | |||||||
Counterparties without external credit rating | 728 779 | 121 808 | |||||||
Total trade receivables | 728 779 | 545 861 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
AA- | 1 021 335 | 606 611 | |||||||
BBB + | 387 140 | 925 | |||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents | 1 408 475 | 607 536 | |||||||
Derivative financial assets | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
AA- | 23 688 | 18 360 | |||||||
Total derivative and financial assets | 23 688 | 18 360 | |||||||
Available-for sale financial assets | |||||||||
(NOK 1 000) | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Januar 1st | 5 628 | 225 761 | |||||||
Additions | 0 | 0 | |||||||
Sale | 0 | -213 945 | |||||||
Net gains/(losses) recognised in comprehensive income | 1 608 | -4 376 | |||||||
Net gains/(losses) recorded in profit and loss | 0 | -1 812 | |||||||
December 31st | 7 236 | 5 628 | |||||||
Non-current portion | 7 236 | 5 628 | |||||||
Current portion | 0 | 0 | |||||||
Available-for-sale financial assets at 31 December 2009 consist of an investment in unlisted equity instrument in Silver Pensjonsforsikring. The fair value of available for sale financial assets is MNOK 7.2 (2008: MNOK 5.6). Fair value of the equity investment is estimated by using calculations of fair value per share from Holberg Fondsforvaltning AS multiplied with the number of shares held in the investment. Holberg Fondsforvaltning AS is a professional investment manager situated in Norway. The fair value of the shares is assessed to be a best estimate for the market value of the investment. | |||||||||
The Group sold an investment in debt security in 2008 amounting to MNOK 213.9 and realizing a net loss of MNOK 2.5 related to the investment. Interest income earned on the debt security in 2008 was MNOK 0.7. Additionally, an increase in fair value of MNOK 1.6 (reduction 2008:MNOK 4.4) was recognized in comprehensive income on investment in the unlisted equity instrument. Available-for-sale financial assets are denominated in NOK. | |||||||||
Derivative financial instruments | |||||||||
2009 | 2008 | ||||||||
Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | ||||||
Forward foreign exchange contracts | 0 | 1 227 | 18 360 | 0 | |||||
Forward commodities contracts | 23 688 | 0 | 0 | 104 325 | |||||
Total | 23 688 | 1 227 | 18 360 | 104 325 | |||||
Non-current portion: | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
Current portion: | 23 688 | 1 227 | 18 360 | 104 325 | |||||
Trading derivatives are classified as current assets or liabilities. | |||||||||
There are no effects from fair value hedges in 2009, as fair value hedge accounting has not been applied in 2009. The ineffective portion recognized in profit or loss in 2008 that arises from fair value hedges amounts to a gain of MNOK 358.3. The total amount from derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting amounts to a gain of MNOK 49.3 (2008: loss of MNOK 147.8). See details under the specification of ‘other losses/(gains) – net´ below. | |||||||||
Forward foreign currency contracts | |||||||||
The fair value of the outstanding forward foreign currency contracts at 31 December 2009 were MNOK -1.2 (2008: MNOK 18.4). At 31 December 2009, the Group had forward foreign currency contracts to partially secure future payments of aircraft leases, fuel payments, heavy maintenance cost and other operating costs denominated in USD. These contracts are used to minimize the currency risk related to future payments. | |||||||||
Forward commodities contracts | |||||||||
Forward commodities contracts relates to jet-fuel derivatives. The fair value of the outstanding forward commodities contracts at 31 December 2009 were MNOK 23.7 (2008: MNOK -104.3). At 31 December 2009, the Group had 21 unrealized jet-fuel derivative contracts. These contracts are expected to minimize the jet-fuel price risk related to future jet-fuel purchases. The Group had 3 jet-fuel derivatives at 31 December 2008, all of which were realized during 2009. | |||||||||
The forward currency contracts and forward commodities contracts mature at various dates during the next 12 months. | |||||||||
Fair value is calculated using marked to market from financial institutions. Spot price in the marked to market calculations are based on mid-prices as set by the financial institutions (Nordea and DnB Nor) at the balance sheet date. | |||||||||
Other losses/(gains) – net | |||||||||
2009 | 2008 | ||||||||
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | |||||||||
- Fair value losses | 121 400 | 191 945 | |||||||
- Fair value gains | -170 714 | -44 177 | |||||||
Total | -49 315 | 147 768 | |||||||
Ineffectiveness on fair value hedges | 0 | -358 264 | |||||||
No financial instruments were designated as hedging instruments in 2009. Losses and gains on financial asset and financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are classified as ‘other losses/(gains) – net’. Hedge ineffectiveness on fair value hedges are classified as financial items (see note 8). The ineffective portion recognized in the profit or loss in 2008 that arises from fair value hedges amounts to a gain of MNOK 358.3. | |||||||||
Note 21 | Trade and other payables | |||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | ||
Accrued vacation pay | 97 347 | 76 927 | ||
Accrued airport and transportation taxes | 178 395 | 76 779 | ||
Accrued expenses | 138 690 | 233 274 | ||
Trade payables | 220 007 | 221 338 | ||
Payable to related party | 0 | 0 | ||
Public duties | 90 299 | 76 818 | ||
Other short term provisions | 21 811 | 9 696 | ||
Total | 746 549 | 694 832 | ||
The short term payables and provisions are non interest bearing and are due within the next 12 months. | ||||
Note 22.1 | Borrowings | |||||||
Nominal value | ||||||||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Nominal value bond issue | 563 000 | 300 000 | ||||||
Amortization | -2 006 | -1 303 | ||||||
Bond as at 31 December at amortized cost | 560 994 | 298 697 | ||||||
Effective interest rate for the year ended 31.12.2009 was 8.4% (2008:8.6%). | ||||||||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Nominal value facility agreement | 628 394 | 408 219 | ||||||
Amortization | -4 784 | -8 586 | ||||||
Facility as at 31 December at amortized cost | 623 610 | 399 632 | ||||||
Effective interest rate for the year ended 31.12.2009 was 7.8% (2008:5.6%). | ||||||||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Nominal value aircraft financing | 400 682 | 0 | ||||||
Amortization | -31 106 | 0 | ||||||
Aircraft financing as at 31 December at amortized cost | 369 577 | 0 | ||||||
Effective interest rate for the year ended 31.12.2009 was 5.4%. | ||||||||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Nominal value financial lease liability | 28 829 | 0 | ||||||
Amortization | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Financial lease liability as at 31 December at amortized cost | 28 829 | 0 | ||||||
Effective interest rate for the year ended 31.12.2009 was 0.6%. | ||||||||
Classification of borrowings | ||||||||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Non-current | ||||||||
Bond issue | 398 296 | 298 697 | ||||||
Facility agreement | 144 747 | 142 176 | ||||||
Aircraft financing | 335 833 | 0 | ||||||
Financial lease liability | 28 829 | 0 | ||||||
Total | 907 705 | 440 873 | ||||||
Current | ||||||||
Bond issue | 162 698 | 0 | ||||||
Facility agreement | 478 863 | 257 456 | ||||||
Aircraft financing | 33 743 | 0 | ||||||
Financial lease liability | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Total | 675 304 | 257 456 | ||||||
Total borrowings | 1 583 010 | 698 329 | ||||||
Collateralized borrowings are detailed in note 23. | ||||||||
Covenants | ||||||||
Bond issue | ||||||||
Equity/Capital Employed higher than 30% | ||||||||
(Capital Employed = equity + borrowings) | ||||||||
Dividend payments less than 35% of net profit | ||||||||
Revolving credit facility | ||||||||
For the revolving credit facility it is agreed covenants linked to cash and cash equivalents in a ratio related to operating cost. In addition it is agreed a covenant linked to gearing (net debt to total capital). Both covenants must be in breach simultaneously in order to be in non-compliance with the covenants. | ||||||||
Aircraft financing | ||||||||
No financial covenants. All borrowings related to delivery of new 737-800 aircraft from Boeing are guaranteed by the Ex-Im Bank of the United States. The Ex-Im Bank of the United States has pledged security in the owned aircraft delivered under the Boeing contract. | ||||||||
There are no covenants related to the financial lease liability. | ||||||||
The Group has not been in breach of any covenants during 2009. | ||||||||
Fair value calculations | ||||||||
The carrying amounts and fair values of the non-current borrowings are as follows; | ||||||||
Carrying amounts | Fair Value | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||
Bond issue | 398 296 | 298 697 | 400 000 | 279 928 | ||||
Facility agreement | 144 747 | 142 176 | 144 747 | 142 176 | ||||
Aircraft financing | 335 833 | 0 | 347 149 | 0 | ||||
Financial lease liability | 28 829 | 0 | 23 745 | 0 | ||||
Fair value of non-current borrowings on the facility agreement equals the carrying amount as transaction costs deducted from the notional amount are higher than future interest payments. The fair value of current borrowings approximates their carrying amount as the impact of discounting is not significant. The fair value of non-current borrowings are based on cash flows discounted using a rate based on the following assumptions: | ||||||||
Bond Issue | ||||||||
Interest rate of NIBOR 3 m and a risk premium equal to the spread at the balance sheet date. The bond issue is an unsecured bond issue denominated in NOK and matures 17 December 2012. The coupon is NIBOR + 5.75%. | ||||||||
ISIN: NO001 0560915 | ||||||||
Name: Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA 09/12 FRN | ||||||||
ISIN: NO 001 0363476, Open bond issue matures 19 April 2010 and is classified as short term. | ||||||||
Facility agreement | ||||||||
Interest rate of LIBOR 1 m and a risk premium equal to the spread at the balance sheet date. The facility agreement was entered into in 2008 with the French financial institution; Natixis. The facility will finance pre-delivery-payments (PDP's) related to the first 10 aircraft in the Boeing contract. | ||||||||
The borrowings mature at the delivery of each aircraft. See note 2 for further maturity analysis of borrowings. The facility agreement is denominated in USD. | ||||||||
Aircraft financing | ||||||||
Fixed interest rate based on LIBOR 7 y and a risk premium equal to the spread at the balance sheet date. The spread is not entity specific, as the agreed spread is based on overall credit risk in the financial markets in the United States. | ||||||||
The borrowings mature quarterly after delivery of the aircraft from Boeing. See note 2 for further maturity analysis of borrowings. The aircraft financing is denominated in USD. | ||||||||
Financial lease liability | ||||||||
The liability is de facto secured in the financial lease asset, as the rights and obligations of the leased asset is returned to the lessor if the lease agreement is not fulfilled. | ||||||||
The discount rates used to calculate the fair value of the financial lease liability equals the risk free interest rate and spread related to unsecured bond issue. The financial lease liability is denominated in NOK. | ||||||||
Future minimum lease payments under financial lease liability | ||||||||
(NOK 1 000) | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Future minimum lease payments | ||||||||
-No later than 1 year | 6 129 | 0 | ||||||
-Between 1 and 5 years | 19 003 | 0 | ||||||
-Later than 5 years | 10 026 | 0 | ||||||
Total | 35 158 | 0 | ||||||
Future finance charges on financial lease liability | 6 329 | 0 | ||||||
Present value of financial lease liability | 28 829 | 0 | ||||||
Note 23 | Assets pledged as collateral and guarantees | |||
Liabilities secured by pledge (NOK 1 000): | 2009 | 2008 | ||
Facility agreement | 623 610 | 399 632 | ||
Aircraft financing | 369 577 | 0 | ||
Financial lease liability | 28 829 | 0 | ||
Total | 1 022 016 | 399 632 | ||
Prepayments on the first 10 aircraft in the purchase contract with Boeing (see note 11) are pledged as collateral for the revolving credit facility (see note 22). The owned aircraft (see note 11) is pledged as collateral for the aircraft financing (see note 22). There is no pledged collateral for the financial lease liability, but the financial lease asset is an actual security for the financial lease liability through fulfilment of the lease agreement. | ||||
Bank guarantees are granted for leasing liabilities for aircraft, suppliers of fuel and handling services, as well as airport charges from airports and governments. | ||||
Book value of assets pledged as security and guarnatees (NOK 1 000) | 2009 | 2008 | ||
Cash depot | 132 476 | 116 837 | ||
Prepayment and aircraft | 1 874 718 | 499 416 | ||
Financial lease asset | 26 092 | 0 | ||
Total | 2 033 286 | 616 253 | ||
Note 24 | Bank deposits | |||
Cash and cash equivalents | ||||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | ||
Cash in bank | 1 021 335 | 606 611 | ||
Cash equivalents | 387 140 | 925 | ||
Total | 1 408 475 | 607 536 | ||
Deposits in money market funds are classified as cash equivalents, as the underlying maturity of the deposits are 3 months or less. At 31 December 2009, the interest terms on the cash deposits on folio accounts is 1 month NIBOR - 0.15 to - 0.30% p.a. Interest terms on restricted cash deposits on folio accounts is 1 month NIBOR - 0.15% p.a. | ||||
Receivables on credit card companies are included in trade receivables. See note 13. | ||||
Restricted cash items are as follows: | ||||
NOK 1 000 | 2009 | 2008 | ||
Guarantees for leases and credits from suppliers | 132 476 | 116 837 | ||
Taxes withheld | 46 847 | 34 275 | ||
Total | 179 323 | 151 113 | ||
Note 25 | Investment in subsidiaries | ||||||
Norwegian Air Shuttle Polska SP.zo.o | |||||||
The subsidiary was established in 2006 and is 100% owned. All of the Group’s revenue generating assets is owned by Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA. The Group’s operations are mainly carried out from the base in Norway, but two of the aircraft in the fleet are designated to the Polish operations and are operating to and from the Warsaw base. The Polish subsidiary is supplying the crew and some lighter maintenance on the aircraft. | |||||||
Norwegian Air Shuttle Sweden AB | |||||||
The subsidiary was purchased 31 July 2007. The Group owns 100 % of the shares in Norwegian Air Shuttle Sweden AB. The total purchase price was MNOK 199.8. The company is based at Arlanda Airport, Stockholm, Sweden. The Swedish subsidiary is supplying the crew and some lighter maintenance on the aircraft. Transactions between parent company and the Swedish subsidiary during 2009 consisted of the supply of personnel and transfer of airline operations. On 1 July 2009, the entire airline operation in Norwegian Air Shuttle Sweden AB was transferred to Norwegian air Shuttle ASA through purchase of assets. Pro et contra payments from the business combination were settled in 2008. | |||||||
Call Norwegian AS | |||||||
On 14 January 2008 the Group established Call Norwegian AS, and owns 100% of the shares. The company provides mobile- and content services, mobile broadband, airport wi-fi and PC packages to external customers in the mass market. | |||||||
NAS Asset Management Ireland Ltd | |||||||
On 15 July 2008 the Group established NAS Asset Management Ltd, a special purpose entity (SPV), and owns 99.9% of the shares. NAS Asset Management Norway AS owns the remaining 0.1% of the shares. The company is incorporated in Ireland and established for aircraft financing purposes. | |||||||
NAS Asset Management Norway AS | |||||||
On 15 July 2008 the Group established NAS Asset Management Norway AS, a special purpose entity (SPV), and owns 100% of the shares. NAS Asset Management Norway AS was established for aircraft financing purposes. | |||||||
Management believes that all inter-company transactions are handled in accordance with the arm’s length principle. | |||||||
Name | Date of initiation/aquisition | Office | Number of shares | Ownership | |||
Norwegian Air Shuttle Polska SP.zo.o | 2006 | Warsaw, Poland | 50 000 | 100% | |||
Norwegian Air Shuttle Sweden AB | 31.07.2007 | Stockholm, Sweden | 20 000 | 100% | |||
Call Norwegian AS | 14.01.2008 | Fornebu, Oslo | 1 000 000 | 100% | |||
NAS Asset Management Ireland Ltd | 15.07.2008 | Dublin, Ireland | 1 000 | 100% | |||
NAS Asset Management Norway AS | 15.07.2008 | Fornebu, Oslo | 100 | 100% | |||
Note 26 | Investment in associated company | |||||||
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has the following investments in associates: | ||||||||
Entity | Country | Industry | Ownership interest | Carrying amount 31.12.2008 | Net profit (loss) 2009 | Carrying amount 31.12.2009 | ||
Norwegian Finans Holding ASA | Norway | Financial Institution | 20% | 44 743 | 3 200 | 47 943 | ||
The associated company, Norwegian Finans Holding ASA, owns 100% of the shares in Bank Norwegian AS. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA owns 20% of the shares in Norwegian Finans Holding ASA. The company is situated in Oslo, Norway. The equity method is applied in accounting for the investment, and the Group’s share of the associated company’s profit and loss is included the carrying amount. The Group’s share of the results and its aggregate assets and liabilities in the associated company, are as follows; | ||||||||
2009 (NOK 1 000) | ||||||||
Entity | Country | Assets | Liabilities | Revenues | Profit / (Loss) | Interest held % | ||
Norwegian Finans Holding ASA | Norway | 411 627 | 369 957 | 23 332 | 3 200 | 20% | ||
Note 27 | Related party transactions | |||||||||
Transactions with related parties | ||||||||||
The Chief Executive Officer is the principal shareholder in Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA with an ownership share of 27.27 % through the controlling ownership of HBK Invest AS. The Chairman of the Board owns minority shares in HBK Invest AS. There have been no financial transactions between HBK Invest AS and Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA in 2009 or 2008. | ||||||||||
The Chairman of the Board, Bjørn Kise is a partner, and the CEO is a former partner in the law firm Vogt & Wiig which is the legal advisor of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA. | ||||||||||
The parent company has received commission from the associated company in 2009. The commission relates to sales performed by the parent company's customers using 'Bank Norwegian' credit cards. The total commission for 2009 is enclosed in the table below. There are no inter-company receivables or - payables at 31 December 2009. | ||||||||||
No loans or guarantees have been issued to related parties in 2009 or 2008. | ||||||||||
See note 7 for details on key management compensation and note 15 for shares and options held directly or indirectly by members of the Board of Directors, CEO and Executive Management. | ||||||||||
Terms and conditions for transactions with related parties | ||||||||||
Management believe that transactions with related parties are performed at arm’s-lengths conditions. Terms and principles for transactions with related parties are continuously evaluated. | ||||||||||
The following transactions were carried out with related parties: | ||||||||||
Sales (-) and purchases (+) of goods and services (excl VAT) | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||
- Vogt & Wiig (legal services) | 3 447 | 4 481 | ||||||||
- Associate (commission) | (9 540) | (5 229) | ||||||||
Year-end balances arising from sales/purchases of goods/services (incl VAT) | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||
Receivables from related parties (note 13) | ||||||||||
- Vogt & Wiig (legal services) | 0 | 0 | ||||||||
- Associate (commission) | 850 | 0 | ||||||||
Investment in related parties | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||
- Associate (subordinated loan) | 30 088 | 0 | ||||||||
Note 28 | Contingencies and legal claims | ||||
Law suit | |||||
On 17 November 2006, Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA (“Norwegian”) filed a civil action against SAS Braathens AS (now SAS Scandinavian Airlines Norge AS) and SAS AS (publ.) for unjustified access to and improper use of sensitive trade secrets. The access was gained through the booking system Amadeus in the period from September 2002 to November 2005. SAS obtained price sensitive information about routes flown by both SAS and Norwegian. Norwegian is claiming damages for the illegal actions. | |||||
Asker & Bærum tingrett ruled in favour of Norwegian in May 2008. Norwegian received damages of NOK 132 million for the economic loss resulting from SAS’s misuse of Norwegian’s trade secrets in addition to legal costs of NOK 7 million. Both parties have appealed. The hearings before the Court of Appeals were finalized in November 2009. The Court of Appeals has not yet rendered its judgment. | |||||
SAS’ payment obligations from Asker & Bærum tingrett have been secured by a bank guarantee of NOK 146 million which includes legal costs and interests. | |||||
In 2006 the Norwegian authorities filed charges against SAS for unjust access to Norwegian’s trade secrets. SAS was sentenced in Borgarting Court of Appeal after the Norwegian Supreme Court in December 2007 upheld the ruling from Borgarting Court of Appeal. | |||||
The outcome of the civil action is not dependent on the ruling in the criminal action. See also note 30. | |||||
Note 29 | Commitments | ||||
In August 2007, Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA entered a purchase agreement of 42 new Boeing 737-800 aircraft with Blended Winglets. The aircraft have a list price of USD 3.1 billion. Parallel to this, Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has ensured the purchase rights for an additional 42 aircraft of the same model from Boeing. | |||||
In October 2009 Norwegian exercised 6 purchase rights, making the total order for direct-by for Boeing 737-800 aircraft 48. Remaining purchase rights as of 31 December 2009 are 42 aircraft. | |||||
During 2009 Norwegian received the first two aircraft. The remaining 46 aircraft will be delivered over a five-year period from 2010 through 2014. The purchase price will be paid over several USD instalments before delivery of each aircraft. | |||||
For further commitments on the aircraft leases, see note 12. | |||||
Note 30 | Events after the balance sheet date | ||||
In March 2010 the Court of Appeals awarded Norwegian damages of NOK 160 million in addition to legal costs of NOK 14.7 million in the civil action against SAS for economic loss resulting from SAS’ abuse of Norwegian’s trade secrets. Whether it will be appealed against the judgement was not determined at the time of printing. See also note 28. | |||||
SAS’ payment obligations stemming from the Court of Appeal ruling has been secured by a bank guarantee which includes legal costs and interest. | |||||
In March 2010 Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA signed a 10 years rental contract with related party HBK Invest AS for its new head office at Oksenøyveien 3, Fornebu. | |||||

