NOTE | (NOK 1 000) | 2010 | 2009 | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | ||||
Profit (loss) before tax | 243 098 | 623 040 | ||
Taxes paid | -109 572 | -1 439 | ||
Depreciation, amortisation and write-down | 186 707 | 148 882 | ||
Pension expense without cash effect | 25 639 | 32 664 | ||
Profit from associated company | -6 328 | 3 200 | ||
Compensation expense for employee options | 7 100 | 8 678 | ||
Losses/(gains) on disposal of tangible assets | -15 927 | 0 | ||
Fair value (gains)/losses on financial assets | -5 931 | -108 426 | ||
Financial items | -26 600 | 47 974 | ||
Interest received | 39 171 | 16 066 | ||
Other non cash items | -2 768 | -1 608 | ||
Change in inventories, accounts receivable and accounts payable | 171 628 | 42 111 | ||
Change in air traffic settlement liabilities | 161 519 | 194 552 | ||
Change in other current assets and current liabilities | 136 891 | -91 876 | ||
Net cash flow from operating activities | 804 628 | 913 818 | ||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | ||||
Prepayments aircraft purchase | -1 361 758 | -683 764 | ||
Purchase of tangible assets | -427 909 | -544 979 | ||
Purchase of intangible assets | -49 846 | -41 151 | ||
Payment to associated company | -8 000 | -30 000 | ||
Net cash flow from investing activities | -1 847 513 | -1 299 894 | ||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES: | ||||
Proceeds from long term debt | 1 134 510 | 968 304 | ||
Payment of long term debt | -242 564 | -4 220 | ||
Proceeds from issuing new shares | 13 225 | 250 840 | ||
Interest on borrowings | -91 849 | -26 865 | ||
Net cash flow from financial activities | 813 322 | 1 188 059 | ||
Foreign exchange effect on cash | -497 | -1 045 | ||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents | -230 059 | 800 939 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January | 1 408 475 | 607 536 | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December | 1 178 416 | 1 408 475 | ||
The notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. | ||||
Note 1 | Summary of significant accounting policies | |||
1.1 General information | ||||
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA and its subsidiaries (henceforth referred to as ‘the Group’) are a low-cost airline incorporated in Norway and headquartered at Fornebu outside of Oslo. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA is a public limited liability company and listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange. | ||||
The consolidated financial statements of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA for the year ended 31 December 2010 were authorized for issue by the Board of Directors on 30 March 2011. | ||||
1.2 Basis of preparation | ||||
The consolidated financial statements of Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and IFRIC interpretations, as adopted by the EU. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of available-for-sale financial assets, financial assets and financial liabilities (including derivative instruments) at fair value through profit or loss. | ||||
In order to prepare financial statements in conformity with IFRS, it is necessary to use certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires the management to exercise its judgment when applying the Group’s accounting policies. The areas which implicate a higher degree of judgment or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the consolidated financial statements, are disclosed below. See paragraph 1.5. | ||||
The Group has a strong financial position and there are no indications that the Group is in breach with the going concern convention. The Group continues to adopt the going concern convention in preparing its consolidated financial statements. | ||||
1.2.1 Changes in accounting policies and disclosures | ||||
Standards, amendments and interpretations | ||||
The Group has incorporated the following new standards, amendments and interpretations effective from 1 January 2010; | ||||
- IFRS 3, ‘Business combinations’ (revised) | ||||
- IAS 27, ‘Consolidated and separate financial statements’ (revised) | ||||
- IAS 36, ‘Unit of accounting goodwill impairment test’ | ||||
- IFRS 8, ‘Disclosure of information about segment assets’ | ||||
IFRS 3 maintains the purchase method to business transactions with all transaction- related costs expensed. The revised standard has no impact on the financial position or the Group's performance. Implementation of IAS 27 and IAS 36 have no impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements. IFRS 8 was promptly adopted in 2009 and has no impact on the Group’s consolidated financial statements as similar principles were applied in previous periods. | ||||
The following standards and interpretations are mandatory for the financial year beginning 1 January 2010, but are not relevant to the Group; | ||||
- IFRIC 17, ‘Distribution of non-cash assets to owners’ | ||||
- IFRIC 18, ‘Transfers of assets from Customers’ | ||||
- IFRIC 9, ‘Reassessment of embedded derivatives and IAS 39’ (amendment) | ||||
- IFRIC 16, 'Hedges of a net investment in a foreign operation’ | ||||
- IAS 1, ‘Current/non current classification of convertible instruments’ | ||||
- IFRS 2, ‘Group cash-settled and share-based payments transactions’ (amendment) | ||||
- IFRS 5, ‘Disclosures required in respect of non current assets’ | ||||
- IAS 39, ‘Treating loan prepayment penalties as closely related derivatives’ | ||||
- IAS 39, ‘Scope exemption for business combinations’ | ||||
- IAS 39, ‘Cash flow hedge accounting’ | ||||
- IAS 39, ‘Hedging using internal contracts’ | ||||
- IAS 7, ‘Classification of expenditures on unrecognised assets’ | ||||
- IAS 38, ‘Measuring the fair value of an intangible asset acquired in a business combination’ | ||||
- IAS 38, ‘Intangible assets’ (amendment) | ||||
- IAS 38, ‘Additional consequential amendments arising from IFRS 3 (revised)’ | ||||
The following standards, amendments and interpretations were not in effectiv at 31 December 2010 and have not been promptly adopted by the Group; | ||||
Effective for periods beginning on or after | ||||
- IFRS 9, ‘Financial instruments’ | 1 January 2013 | |||
- IAS 24, ‘Related party disclosures’ (revised) | 1 january 2011 | |||
- IAS 32, ‘Classification of right issue’ (amendment) | 1 February 2010 | |||
- IFRIC 19, ‘Extinguishing financial liabilities with equity instruments’ | 1 July 2010 | |||
- IFRIC 14, ‘Prepayments of a minimum funding requirement’ (amendment) | 1 January 2011 | |||
These standards, amendments and interpretations are not expected to have material impact on the financial statements. | ||||
1.3 Basis of consolidation | ||||
The Group’s consolidated financial statements comprise Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA, and its fully owned subsidiaries Norwegian Air Shuttle Polska Sp.zo.o, Norwegian Air Shuttle Sweden AB, NAS Asset Management Ireland Ltd, NAS Asset Management Norway AS and Call Norwegian AS. Additionally, the Group controls two companies in the United States, DY 1 Leasing LLC and NO 8 LLC. These are special purpose entities (SPE’s) established for aircraft financing and ownership of real estate purposes, respectively. The Group does not own the shares in DY 1 Leasing LLC, but accepts all risks and rewards related to the assets, liabilities and operations in the SPE. The Group owns all the units of membership in NO 8 LLC and has control over the company. | ||||
The financial statements of the subsidiaries and SPE’s are prepared for the same reporting period as the parent company, using consistent accounting policies. | ||||
The acquisition method is applied when accounting for business combinations. Companies which have been acquired or sold during the year, are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date when control is achieved and till the date when control is ceased. | ||||
The consideration which is transferred for the acquisition of a subsidiary consists of the fair values of the assets transferred, the liabilities incurred and the equity interests issued by the Group. The transferred consideration includes the fair value of any asset or liability resulting from a contingent consideration arrangement. Acquisition-related costs are expensed as incurred. Acquired identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are initially measured at their fair values at the acquisition date. On an acquisition –by-acquisition basis, the Group recognizes any non-controlling interests of the acquiree either at fair value, or at the non-controlling interest’s proportionate share of the acquiree’s net assets. Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for at cost less impairment. Cost is adjusted to reflect changes in consideration arising from contingent consideration amendments. Cost also includes direct attributable costs of investment. The excess of the consideration transferred and the amount of non-controlling interest over the fair value of the Group’s share of the identifiable net assets acquired are recorded as goodwill. Should this be less than the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired in the bargain purchase, the difference will be recognized directly in the statement of comprehensive income. | ||||
All intra Group balances, transactions and unrealized gains and losses on transactions between Group companies are eliminated. | ||||
The Group considers transactions with non-controlling interests as transactions with equity owners of the Group. Any difference between considerations paid and the relevant share acquired from the carrying value of net assets are recorded in equity. Gains or losses on disposals to non-controlling interests are also recorded in equity. | ||||
An associate is an entity where the Group holds a significant influence but does not control the management of its finances and operations (usually when the Group owns 20%-50% of the company). The consolidated financial statements include the Group’s share of the profits/losses from associates, accounted for using the equity method, from the date when a significant influence is achieved and till the date when such influence is ceased. The Group’s share of its associates’ post- acquisition profits or losses is recognized in the income statement, and its share of post-acquisition movements in other comprehensive income is recognized in other comprehensive income. The cumulative post-acquisition movements are adjusted against the carrying amount of the investment. Dilution gains and losses arising in investments in associates are recognized in the income statement. | ||||
When the Group’s share of a loss exceeds the Group’s investment in an associate, the amount carried in the Group’s balance sheet is reduced to zero and further losses are not recognized unless the Group has an obligation to cover any such loss. Unrealized gains on transactions between the Group and its associates are eliminated in proportion to the Group’s interest in the associates. Unrealized losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. | ||||
All other investments are recognized in accordance with IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, and additional information is provided in note 20. | ||||
1.4 Foreign currency translation | ||||
The Group’s presentation currency is NOK. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA’s functional currency is NOK. Each entity in the Group determines its own functional currency and items which are included in the entities’ financial statements are measured in that functional currency. For consolidation purposes, the results and financial position of all the Group’s entities which have a functional currency other than NOK, are translated at the closing rate at the balance sheet date. Income and expenses for each income statement are translated at the average exchange rate for the period, this being a reasonable approximation for estimating actual rate. Exchange differences are recognized in comprehensive income and specified separately in equity. | ||||
Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded at the functional currency rate using the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions or valuation where items are remeasured. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated to the functional currency exchange rate ruling at the balance sheet date. All differences are recognized in the income statement. Non-monetary items which are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are translated using the exchange rates at the dates of the initial transactions. | ||||
Foreign currency gains and losses on operating activities are recognized within operating profit. Foreign currency gains and losses on financing activities are recognized within net financial items. | ||||
Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on the acquisition of a foreign entity are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at the closing rate. | ||||
1.5 Critical accounting estimates and judgements | ||||
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the management will be required to judgments, estimates and assumptions which affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses. The critical judgments and key sources of estimation uncertainty that have been made in preparing the consolidated financial statements are detailed below. These judgments involve assumptions or estimates in light of future events which can differentiate from what is expected. | ||||
The lease contracts require the aircraft to be returned at the end of the lease in accordance with the specific redelivery conditions stated in the lease contracts. To meet this requirement, the Group conducts maintenance on these aircraft, both regularly and at the expiration of the leasing period. Provisions are made based on the estimated costs of overhaul and maintenance. In order to estimate these conditions, the management must make assumptions regarding expected future maintenance. For sensitivity analysis, see note 12. | ||||
Deferred tax assets are recognized for all unused tax losses to the extent where it is probable that taxable profit will be generated. Significant management judgment is required to determine the amount of deferred tax assets which can be recognized, based on the anticipated timing and level of future taxable profits together with future tax planning strategies. See note 9 for further details. | ||||
The cost of defined benefit pension plans is determined by using actuarial valuations. The actuarial valuation involves making assumptions on discount rates, expected rates of return on assets, future salary increases, mortality rates and future pension increases. Due to the long term nature of these plans, such estimates are subject to a high degree of uncertainty. A sensitivity analysis is enclosed in note 18. | ||||
The Group tests annually whether goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives, have suffered any impairment in accordance with the accounting policy stated in note 1.8. The recoverable amounts of cash-generating units have been determined based on value-in-use calculations. These calculations require the use of estimates (see note 10). | ||||
Bad debt provisions for credit card receivables are based on actual historical loss percentage and actual withdrawal for payments from credit card companies. | ||||
Fair value of financial instruments is determined using fair value estimation techniques. Valuation techniques and details on financial instruments are outlined in note 20. | ||||
1.6 Tangible assets | ||||
Tangible assets are carried at historical cost, less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. When assets are sold or disposed of, the gross carrying amount and accumulated depreciation and impairment losses are derecognized. Any gain on the sale is recognized in the income statement as other income and any loss on the sale or disposal is recognized in the income statement as other losses/(gains)-net. | ||||
The gross carrying amount of non-current assets is the purchase price, including duties/taxes and direct acquisition costs relating to making the non-current asset ready for its intended use. Subsequent costs, such as repair and maintenance costs, are normally recognized in profit or loss as incurred. When increased future economic benefits are the result of verified repair and maintenance work, these costs will be recognized in the balance sheet as additions to non-current assets. Borrowing costs are capitalized on qualifying assets. | ||||
Non-current assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis or by airborne hours and cycles over the estimated useful life of the asset beginning when the asset is ready for its intended use. Expected residual value is assessed when estimating the depreciable amount of the asset and deducted from the depreciable amount. | ||||
An aircraft is decomposed into two components for depreciation purposes to consider different useful lives of the aircraft components. The first aircraft component is defined as maintenance components. In accordance with official requirements, the aircraft must be maintained which means significant components must be changed after a specific number of takeoffs or airborne hours. These components are identified as C check and D check on aircraft body, power restoration and life limited parts for the two engines on each plane, as well as maintenance on landing gears and APU. The maintenance and overhaul on these components occur on a defined interval, and the value is depreciated based on number of takeoffs or airborne hours until the next maintenance is conducted. Completed maintenance and overhaul are capitalized and depreciated until the next relevant maintenance and overhaul. The second aircraft component is defined as the remainder of the aircraft and depreciated over the economic useful life. | ||||
Investments in leased aircraft including cabin interior modifications are depreciated over their useful lives, but not exceeding the remaining leasing period. | ||||
Rotable spare parts are carried as non current assets and depreciated over their useful lives. | ||||
Buildings are carried at acquisition cost, less accumulated depreciation. | ||||
The Group capitalizes prepayments on the purchase contract of 63 Boeing 737 aircraft. The prepayments are classified as tangible assets as presented at the face of the balance sheet. The prepayments include capitalized borrowing costs. At the delivery of the aircraft, prepayments are included in acquisition cost of the aircraft and reclassified as aircraft in the balance sheet. | ||||
Financial lease assets are initially recognized at the lowest of acquisition cost and future minimum lease payments. The assets are carried as non current assets and depreciated on a straight-line basis over their expected useful lives. | ||||
The depreciation period and method are assessed annually to ensure that they reconcile with the substance of the non-current asset. The residual value is estimated at each year end and changes to the residual value are accounted for prospectively. Additional details on tangible assets are outlined in note 11. | ||||
1.7 Intangible assets | ||||
Computer software | ||||
Acquired computer software licenses are capitalized on the basis of the costs incurred to obtain and apply the specific software. These costs are amortized over their estimated useful life. | ||||
Costs associated with developing or maintaining computer software programs are recognized as an expense as incurred. Costs which are directly associated with the development of identifiable software products controlled by the Group, and which are estimated will generate economic benefits, are recognized as intangible assets. Computer software development costs recognized as assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives. The depreciation of the software commence as each module is completed. | ||||
Goodwill and other intangible assets | ||||
Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the Group’s share of the net identifiable assets of the acquired subsidiary at the date of acquisition. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment and carried at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Gains and losses on the disposal of an entity include the carrying amount of goodwill relating to the entity sold. | ||||
Other intangible assets are related to identifiable assets from business combinations and investments in other intangible assets. | ||||
Intangible assets which are determined as having indefinite economic lives, are not amortized, but subject for annual impairment testing. The determination of indefinite economic lives is based on the management’s assessment concerning there is no foreseeable limit to the period over which the asset is expected to generate net cash inflows for the entity. | ||||
See note 1.8 for details of impairment testing of non-financial assets and note 10 for additional details on intangible assets. | ||||
1.8 Impairment of non financial assets | ||||
Intangible assets which have an indefinite economic useful life are not subject to amortization and are tested annually for impairment. Assets that are subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and value in use. | ||||
For the purposes of impairment testing, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifiable cash flows (cash-generating units). The allocation is made to those cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the assets. The management has assessed the Group as one segment and the Group’s total operations as its cash generating unit. The determination of cash generating units is based on how the management operates and assesses the Group’s performance, profit and cash flow. The aircraft fleet is operated as one unit and the route portfolio is administered and diversified as one unit generating the Group's profit and cash flow; hence, goodwill and other non current assets are reallocated to the entire Group for the purpose of impairment testing. | ||||
Non current assets other than goodwill which suffered impairment are reviewed for a possible reversal of the impairment at each reporting date. Impairment losses on goodwill are not reversed. | ||||
1.9 Financial assets | ||||
Financial assets are classified in the following categories; as fair value through profit or loss, held-to-maturity investments, loans and receivables and available-for-sale. The Group holds financial instruments that are classified as fair value through profit or loss, available-for-sale, and loans and receivables. The classification depends on the purpose for which the financial assets were acquired. The management determines the classification of its financial assets at initial recognition. | ||||
Financial assets which are categorized as fair value through profit or loss are financial assets held for trading. A financial asset is classified in this category if it was principally acquired for the purpose of selling on a the short-term basis. Derivatives are also categorized as held for trading unless they are designated as hedges. Assets in this category are classified as current assets. | ||||
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They are included in current assets, except for maturities greater than 12 months after the balance sheet date. These are classified as non-current assets. The Group’s loans and receivables comprise trade, other receivables, cash and cash equivalents in the balance sheet (See note 1.12 and 1.13 respectively). | ||||
Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivatives that are either designated in this category or not classified in any of the other categories. They are included in non-current assets unless the management intends to dispose of the investments within 12 months of the balance sheet date. | ||||
Regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized on the trade-date; the date on which the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset. Investments are initially recognized at fair value plus transaction costs for all financial assets not carried at fair value through profit or loss. Financial assets carried at fair value through profit or loss, are initially recognized at fair value and transaction costs are expensed in the income statement. Financial assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or have been transferred and the Group has substantially transferred all risks and rewards of ownership. Available-for-sale financial assets and financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are subsequently carried at fair value. Loans and receivables are carried at amortized cost using the effective interest method. | ||||
Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of the ‘financial assets at fair value through profit or loss’ category are presented in the income statement within ‘other losses/(gains) – net’ in the period in which they occur. Gains or losses which occur from changes in the fair value of the ‘available-for-sale’ category are presented in equity within ‘other reserves’ in the period in which they occur. Interests on available-for-sale securities which are calculated using the effective interest method, is recognized in the income statement as part of other income. Dividend income from financial assets at fair value through profit or loss and available- for- sale financial assets are recognized in the income statement as a part of other income when the Group’s right to receive payments is established. | ||||
1.9.1 Impairment of financial assets | ||||
The Group assesses at each balance sheet date whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets are impaired. The fair values of quoted investments are based on current mid prices at the balance sheet date. If the market for a financial asset is not active (and for unlisted securities), the Group establishes fair value by using valuation techniques. The valuation hierarchy for financial assets is detailed in note 20 where the techniques are making maximum use of market inputs and relying as little as possible on entity-specific inputs. | ||||
Impairment losses of financial assets measured at amortized cost are incurred only if there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events which occur after initial recognition. Impairment losses are recognized in the consolidated income statement if the losses have had an impact on the estimated future cash flows and that the impact can be reliably estimated. | ||||
Impairment losses of available-for-sale financial assets are incurred if evidence exists of a prolonged or significant decline in the fair value of the security below its initial cost. If any such evidence exists, the cumulative loss (measured as the difference between the initial cost and the current fair value, less any impairment loss on that financial asset previously recognized in profit or loss) is removed from equity and comprehensive income and recognized in the income statement. If an increase in the fair value of available-for–sale financial assets occur in a subsequent period and the increase can be objectively related to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognized in profit or loss, the impairment loss is reversed through the statement of comprehensive income. | ||||
1.10 Derivative financial instruments and hedging activities | ||||
Derivatives are initially recognized at fair value on the transaction date and subsequently measured at their fair value. Derivatives are classified within the category ‘financial assets at fair value through profit or loss’ as long as the derivatives are not designated as hedging instruments for accounting purposes. | ||||
The Group has not designated any derivatives as hedging instruments for accounting purposes in 2010 or 2009. | ||||
1.11 Inventory | ||||
Inventory of spare parts are carried at the lower of acquisition cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined using the first in – first out (FIFO) method. Obsolete inventory have been fully recognized as impairment losses. Inventory is consumed during maintenance and overhaul of the airplanes, and is expensed when consumed. | ||||
1.12 Trade receivables | ||||
Trade receivables are recognized initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less provision for impairment. A provision for impairment of trade receivables is established when there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of the receivables. Significant financial difficulties of the debtor, probability that the debtor will enter bankruptcy or deliver payments which are more than 30 days overdue, are considered as indications that the trade receivable is impaired. The amount of the provision is the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the original effective interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced through the use of an allowance account, and the amount of the loss is recognized in the income statement as other operating expenses. When a trade receivable is uncollectible, it is written off against the allowance account for trade receivables. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against other operating expenses in the income statement. | ||||
Receivables from credit card companies are classified as trade receivables in the balance sheet. | ||||
1.13 Cash and cash equivalents | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand and in banks, as well as short term deposits with an original maturity of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents in the balance sheet include restricted funds from withheld employee tax, guarantees and deposits pledged as collateral for suppliers (note 24). | ||||
The Group holds investments in money market funds. These investments are classified as either cash equivalents or financial assets available-for-sale depending on the maturity of the investments. | ||||
1.14 Equity | ||||
Share capital comprises the number of shares multiplied by their nominal value, and are classified as equity. | ||||
Transaction costs relating to an equity transaction are recognized directly in equity net of tax. Only transaction costs directly attributable to the equity transaction are recognized directly in equity. | ||||
Acquisition of own shares are recognized in share capital and retained earnings. The number of shares purchased multiplied by the nominal value is deducted from outstanding share capital. The share premium paid is recognized in other equity. The sale of own shares is booked accordingly, with nominal value as increase of share capital, and share premium in other equity. | ||||
1.15 Liabilities | ||||
Borrowings are recognized initially at fair value, net of transaction costs incurred. Borrowings are subsequently measured at amortized cost; difference between the proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the redemption value is recognized in the income statement over the period of the borrowings using the effective interest method. | ||||
Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the Group has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least 12 months after the balance sheet date. For details for capitalization of borrowing costs, see note 11. | ||||
Trade payables are obligations to pay for goods or services purchased from suppliers in the ordinary course of business. Accounts payables are classified as current liabilities if payment is due within the next 12 months. Payables due after the next 12 months are classified as non-current liabilities. Trade payables are recognized initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. | ||||
1.16 Provisions | ||||
Provisions are recognized when the Group has a present obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation and the amount has been reliably estimated. Where the Group expects some or all of a provision to be reimbursed, for example under an insurance contract, the reimbursement is recognized as a separate asset but only when the reimbursement is virtually certain. The expense relating to any provision is presented in the income statement net of any reimbursement. If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are discounted using a current pre tax rate that reflects, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability. Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognized as a finance cost. | ||||
1.17 Employee benefits | ||||
The Group operates various pension schemes. The schemes are generally funded through payments to insurance companies or trustee-administered funds, determined by periodic actuarial calculations. | ||||
Defined benefit plans | ||||
The Group operates a defined benefit pension plan which requires contributions to be made to a separately administered fund. In addition, the Group participates in an early retirement plan (AFP) for all employments in Norway. The cost of providing benefits under the defined benefit plan is determined using the projected unit credit actuarial valuation method. Actuarial gains and losses are recognized as income or expense when the net cumulative unrecognized actuarial gains and losses, at the end of the previous reporting year, exceed 10% of the greater of the defined benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets at that date. These gains or losses are recognized over the expected average remaining working lives of the employees participating in the plans. | ||||
The past service cost is recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the average period until the benefits are vested. If the benefits are already vested immediately following the introduction of or changes to a pension plan, past service cost is recognized immediately. | ||||
The defined benefit obligation is the aggregate of the present value of the defined benefit obligation and actuarial gains and losses not recognized reduced by past service costs not yet recognized and the fair value of plan assets out of which the obligations are to be settled directly. If such aggregate is negative, the asset is measured at the lower of such aggregate or at the aggregate of cumulative unrecognized net actuarial losses and past service cost and the present value of any economic benefits available in the form of refunds from the plan or reductions in the future contributions to the plan. | ||||
The AFP pension plan was closed in 2010, and replaced with a new AFP pension plan. The new AFP pension plan is a multi-employer defined benefit plan. However, the plan is recognized in the income statement as a defined contribution plan as the plans administrator has not administered actuarial gains/losses to the members of the AFP pension plan as of 31 December 2010. | ||||
Defined contribution plans | ||||
In addition to the defined benefit plan described above, the Group operates a defined contribution plan. A defined contribution plan is a pension plan under which the Group pays fixed contributions to a separate entity. The Group has no legal or constructive obligations to pay further contributions should the fund not hold sufficient assets to pay all employees the benefits relating to employee service in the current and prior periods. The contributions are recognized as employee benefit expense when they are due. Prepaid contributions are recognized as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a reduction in the future payments is available. | ||||
Share-based payments | ||||
The Group operates a number of equity-settled, share-based compensation plans under which the entity receives services from employees as consideration for equity instruments of the Group. The fair value of the employee services received in exchange for the grants of the options is recognized as an expense over the vesting period. The total amount to be expensed is determined by referring to the fair value of the options granted. | ||||
The fair value of the options to be settled in equity instruments is estimated at the grant date The fair value is determined by an external part by applying a Black and Scholes model. The assumptions underlying the number of options expected to vest are adjusted to reflect conditions prevailing at the balance sheet date. For further details see note 17. | ||||
The social security contributions payable in connection with the grant of the share options is considered an integral part of the grant itself, and the charge will be treated as a cash–settled transaction. | ||||
Employee share purchase savings program | ||||
Bonus shares and employer’s contribution are measured at fair value using Black and Scholes option pricing model. Expenses for bonus shares are included in personnel costs. The fair value of the bonus shares and the estimated employer’s contribution are distributed as expenses over the expected period until settlement. Changes in estimates affecting employer’s contribution are expensed over the remaining expected period. For further details see note 17. | ||||
1.18 Current and deferred income tax | ||||
The tax expense for the period comprises current and deferred tax. Tax is recognized in the income statement, except to the extent when it relates to items recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity. In this case, the tax is also recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity, respectively. | ||||
Current income tax | ||||
Current income tax assets and liabilities for the current and prior periods are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws which are used to compute the amount are those which are enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. | ||||
Deferred income tax | ||||
Deferred income tax is determined by using the liability method on temporary differences at the balance sheet date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes. | ||||
Deferred income tax liabilities are recognized for all taxable temporary differences. Deferred income tax assets are recognized for all deductible temporary differences, carry forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences, and the carry forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses can be utilized. | ||||
The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilized. Unrecognized deferred income tax assets are reassessed at each balance sheet date and are recognized to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profit will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered. | ||||
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected for the year when the asset is realized or when the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) which have been enacted, or substantively enacted, at the balance sheet date. | ||||
Deferred income tax assets and deferred income tax liabilities are offset to the extend that: | ||||
• the Group has a legal and enforceable right to offset the recognized amounts and | ||||
• if deferred tax assets and tax liabilities relates to income tax from the same tax authorities and the same taxable entity in the Group, or if different taxable entities in the Group intends either to settle on a net basis, or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. | ||||
Deferred income tax is provided based on temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries and associates, except where the timing of the reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the Group and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future. | ||||
1.19 Contingent assets and liabilities | ||||
A contingent asset is not recognized in the annual financial statements, but disclosed in the notes where an inflow of economic benefits is probable. | ||||
Contingent liabilities are defined as possible obligations arising from past events which existence depends on future events, or it is not probable that they will lead to an outflow of resources, or cannot be measured with sufficient reliability. | ||||
Contingent liabilities are not recognized in the annual financial statements, but significant contingent liabilities are disclosed in the notes to the financial statements, with the exception of contingent liabilities where the probability of the liability occurring is remote. | ||||
1.20 Revenue recognition | ||||
Revenue comprises the fair value of the consideration received or receivable for the sale of goods and services in the ordinary course of the Group’s activities. Revenue is shown net of value-added tax and discounts. The Group recognises revenue when the amount of revenue can be reliably measured, it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the entity and when specific criteria have been met for each of the Group’s activities as described below. | ||||
Passenger revenue | ||||
Passenger revenue is reported as traffic revenue when the air transport has been carried out. The value of tickets sold and which are still valid but not used at the balance sheet date (amounts sold in excess of revenue recognized) is reported as air traffic settlement liability. This liability is reduced either when the Group or another airline completes the transportation or when the passenger requests a refund. | ||||
Ancillary revenue | ||||
Ancillary revenue comprises sales of ticket-related products and services, e.g; excess baggage and fees. Some of the products and services are earned at the time of the transport, and such revenue is recognized in the same manner as passenger revenue. Other products and services are earned at the time of purchase and immediately recognized in the income statement. | ||||
Amounts paid by ‘no show’ customers are recognized as revenue when the booked service is provided. ‘No show’ customers with low fare tickets are not entitled to change flights or seek refunds once a flight has departed. | ||||
Other revenue | ||||
Other revenue comprises third party revenue, such as wet-lease, cargo and revenue from business activities in subsidiaries which are not airlines. | ||||
Other airline revenue is recognized when the service has been rendered, fees are reliable measurable, collections are probable, and when other significant obligations have been fulfilled. | ||||
Revenue from sales of GSM, Broadband and Wi-Fi products and services comprises traffic fees and subscription, as well as telephone and PC products. Revenue from subscription fees are recognized over the subscription period while deliveries of other services are recognized as revenue at the time of consumption. Revenue from product sales is recognized when the equipment including related significant risks and rewards are transferred to the buyer and the entity no longer retains effective control over the products sold. | ||||
Customer loyalty program – Norwegian Reward | ||||
The Group has implemented a customer loyalty program. Customers earn cash points in the following circumstances; | ||||
• Bank Norwegian customer; 1% of the payment is earned on all purchases, except domestic flights within Norway or flights with competitive airlines within Norway. Cash points are also earned on all ‘low fare’ and ‘full flex’ tickets purchased from Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA which are paid with a Bank Norwegian credit card, with 4% and 19% of the purchase price, respectively. | ||||
• My reward customer; 2% on all low fare tickets and 10% on all full flex tickets. | ||||
• Corporate reward customer; 3% on all low fare tickets and 7% on all full flex tickets. | ||||
• Call Norwegian customer; 3% of all purchases. | ||||
Corporate customers gain cash points on all airfares. Private customers gain cash points on international flights only, as domestic flights in Norway are prohibited from cash points earning for private customers. | ||||
Customer cash points gained from purchasing airline tickets and purchases from Call Norwegian are recognized as a liability in the balance sheet and deducted from the value of the purchase at the date of purchase. The customer cash point liability is derecognized from the balance sheet and recognized as income when customers utilize their cash points. | ||||
Earned customer cash points on 1% reward from Bank Norwegian are recognized as a liability in the balance sheet and immediately expensed. When the customers utilize earned cash points, the liability is derecognized and cash payment on the Group’s services reduced. | ||||
Unutilized cash points are derecognized from the balance sheet after three years. The liability is classified as short term, as available statistics as of 31 December 2010 indicate that customer cash points are utilized within one year. | ||||
1.21 Leasing | ||||
To determine whether an arrangement is, or contains a lease, it is necessary to assess whether the fulfillment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of a specific asset and if the arrangement conveys a right to use the asset. | ||||
The lease agreements, in which, most of the risk lies with the contracting party are classified as operating leases. Operating lease payments are recognized as an expense in the income statement on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Payments for the lease and payments for other elements are recognized separately. | ||||
Deposits made at the inception of operating leases are carried at amortized cost. The difference between the nominal value of a deposit paid, carried at less than market interest and its fair value, is considered as additional rent, payable to the lessor and is expensed on a straight-line basis over the lease term. | ||||
The Group leases tangible assets where the lease agreements transfer all material risks and rewards of the asset to the lessee at the end of the lease term. Such lease agreements are classified as financial leases. Financial leases are recognized at inception to the lowest of acquisition cost and the net present value of minimum lease payments. Financial lease assets are depreciated on a linear basis over the lease period if such is shorter than the economic useful life of the financial lease asset. Financial lease assets are included in the balance sheet as tangible assets. | ||||
Each lease payment under financial leases is split between the lease liability and finance cost to amortize the financial costs related to such leases over the lease period. The lease liability is classified as borrowings, see note 22 for details. | ||||
Sale and lease back transactions are treated as financial leases and operational leases depending on the nature of the lease. The Group has completed two sale and lease back transactions during 2010 with regards to selling two aircraft and leasing back the same asset. Both of the sale and lease back transactions are defined as operating leases established at fair value and any profit or loss is recognized immediately in the income statement as other income. | ||||
1.22 Segment reporting | ||||
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision maker who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing the performance of the operating segments. The chief operating decision maker has been identified as the Board of Directors and Executive Management. The Group has one operational segment, which is low cost air passenger travel. The Group has one geographical segment which is the route portfolio in Europe. See note 4 for further details. | ||||
1.23 Events after the balance sheet date | ||||
New information regarding the Group’s positions at the balance sheet date is taken into account in the preparation of the annual financial statements. Events which occur after the balance sheet date which do not affect the Group’s position at the balance sheet date, but which will affect the Group’s position in the future, are stated if significant. | ||||
Note 2 | Financial Risk | |||
The Group’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks; market risk (including currency risk, interest rate risk and price risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The Group’s overall financial risk management program focuses on changes and fluctuations in financial markets and seeks to minimize potential adverse effects on the Group’s financial performance. The Group uses derivative financial instruments to hedge certain financial risk exposures. | ||||
Financial risk management is carried out by a central treasury department (Group treasury) under policies approved by the Board of Directors. Group treasury identifies, evaluates and hedges financial risk in close co-operation with the Group’s operating units. The Board provides principles for overall risk management such as foreign currency risk, interest rate risk, credit risk, use of derivative financial instruments and investment of excess liquidity. | ||||
Market risk | ||||
Market risk is the risk of changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, jet-fuel prices and interest rates which will affect the Group’s income or value of its holdings of financial instruments. | ||||
Foreign Currency Risk | ||||
A substantial part of the Group’s expenses are denominated in foreign currency. The Group’s leases, aircraft borrowings, maintenance, jet-fuel and related expenses are mainly denominated in USD, and airplane operation expenses are partly denominated in EUR. Foreign exchange risk arises from future commercial transactions, recognised assets and liabilities and net investments in foreign operations. In order to reduce currency risk, the Group has a mandate to hedge up to 100% of its currency exposure over the next 12 months. The hedging consists of forward currency contracts and flexible forwards. | ||||
The Group has included a sensitivity analysis on foreign currency risk based on two different scenarios; sensitivity in USD to NOK on financial assets and liabilities at 31 December, and actual sensitivity in USD exposure interdependent with jet-fuel. The rationale for such sensitivity is that USD exposure in the airline industry is closely related to USD exposure on jet-fuel as jet-fuel actually represents a USD exposure. | ||||
If NOK had weakened/strengthened by 1 % against USD in 2010, with all other variables held constant, post-tax profit and pre-tax equity effect for the year would have been MNOK 5.5 (2009: MNOK 4.5) lower/higher, mainly as a result of foreign exchange losses/gains on receivables, payables, derivative financial instruments, cash and cash equivalents and long term borrowings in USD at 31 December 2010. | ||||
By calculating the sensitivity of the foreign currency risk in USD using USD and jet-fuel prices as interdependent variables on operating income, a weakening/strengthening in NOK by 1% against USD dollar, post-tax profit and post-tax equity effect for 2010 would have been MNOK 20.8 (2009:MNOK 20.6) lower/higher. This calculation is based on estimated fuel consumption over the next 12 months, estimated net outflow of USD over the next 12 months, estimated average jet-fuel price and estimated average USD/NOK exchange rate. | ||||
If NOK had weakened/strengthened by 1 % against EUR with all other variables held constant, post-tax profit and post-tax equity effect for the year would have been MNOK 0.2 (2009: MNOK 0.4) higher/lower, mainly as a result of foreign exchange gains/losses on receivables, payables and derivative financial instruments. | ||||
The Group has investments in operations in Sweden and Poland, whose net assets are exposed to foreign currency translation risk. Currency exposure arising from the net assets of the Group’s foreign operations is regarded as immaterial for the Group, and currency variances are not hedged. | ||||
Cash flow and fair value interest rate risk | ||||
As the Group has net interest bearing debt, the Group’s income and operating cash flows are dependent of changes in the market interest rates. The Group’s cash flow interest rate risk arises from cash and cash equivalents and floating interest rate borrowings. Floating interest rate borrowings consist of unsecured bond issue, revolving credit facility, loan facility and financial lease liabilities. Borrowings issued at fixed rates expose the group to fair value interest rate risk. Fixed interest rate borrowings consist of aircraft financing from PEFCO, guaranteed by the Ex-Im Bank of the United States. Borrowings are denominated in USD and NOK. | ||||
If the floating interest rate in 2010 had been 1 % higher/lower with all other variables held constant, post-tax profit and post-tax equity effect for the year would have been MNOK 1.1 (2009: MNOK 1.5) lower/higher, mainly as a result of higher/lower interest income on floating rate cash and cash equivalents and borrowings. | ||||
The sensitivity analysis of interest rate risk is calculated based on nominal value of floating rate borrowings, cash and cash equivalents. | ||||
The Group measures borrowings at amortized cost. No changes in fair value of fixed rate interest rate borrowings would be accounted for. Fair value calculations of fixed interest rate borrowings are detailed in note 22. | ||||
Jet-fuel prices | ||||
Expenses for jet-fuel represents a substantial part of the Group’s operating costs, and fluctuations in the jet-fuel prices influence the projected cash flows. The objective of the jet-fuel price risk management policy is to safeguard against significant and sudden increases in jet-fuel prices whilst retaining access to price reductions. The Group manages jet-fuel price risk using fuel derivatives. The management has a mandate to hedge up to 100 % of its expected consumption over the next 12 months with forward commodity contracts. | ||||
If the jet-fuel price in 2010 had increased/decreased by 1 % with all other variables held constant, pre-tax profit for the year would have been MNOK 15.1 (2009: MNOK 12.2) lower/higher. | ||||
The sensitivity analysis is calculated based on estimated jet-fuel consumption including estimated hedged consumption over the next 12 months. As opposed to the sensitivity analysis of USD currency risk, the jet-fuel price risk analysis is not based on interdependence between jet-fuel price and USD exchange rates. The sensitivity is calculated using USD/NOK exchange rate at the balance sheet date. | ||||
The Group holds forward commodity contracts to hedge jet-fuel price risk. Such derivative contracts affect the financial statements through unrealized gains/losses from jet-fuel prices. If jet-fuel price had increased/decreased by 1% with all other variables held constant, pre-tax profit for the year would have been MNOK 3.2 (2009: MNOK 15.3) higher/lower, as a result of unrealized gains/losses on price changes on forward commodity contracts held at the balance sheet date. | ||||
Credit risk | ||||
Credit risk is managed on group basis. Credit risk arises from cash and cash equivalents, derivative financial instruments and deposits with banks and financial institutions, as well as credit exposures to travel agencies and commercial customers, including outstanding receivables and committed transactions. The utilization of credit limits is regularly monitored. The Group’s policy is to maintain credit sales at a minimum level. Sales to private customers are settled in cash or using major credit card companies. | ||||
For a part of the Group’s sales, customers pay at the time of booking while Norwegian receive the actual payments from the credit card companies, or acquires are received at a later point in time. Delayed payments from credit card companies vary between credit card brands. The risk arising from receivables on credit card companies or credit card acquires are monitored closely. | ||||
Credit risk related to bank defaults are closely monitored and partly offset by diversifying the Group’s deposit portfolio. | ||||
There are re-invoicing of maintenance costs on aircraft to leasing companies, and Norwegian regularly evaluates and assesses the value of these credits. See note 20 for further disclosure on credit risk. | ||||
Liquidity risk | ||||
Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining sufficient cash and marketable securities, the availability of funding through an adequate amount of committed credit facilities and the ability to close out market positions. | ||||
The management monitors rolling forecasts of the Group’s liquidity reserve, cash and cash equivalents (see note 24) on the basis of expected cash flow. This is generally carried out at a local level at the operating companies of the Group in accordance with practice and limits set by the Group. In addition, the Group's liquidity management policy involves projecting cash flows in major currencies and considering the level of liquid assets necessary to monitor balance sheet liquidity ratios against internal and external regulatory requirements and maintaining debt financing plans. | ||||
The Group will take deliveries of 14 aircraft in 2011 and 40 aircraft between 2012 and 2016. Pre-delivery payments related to the delivery of the first 10 aircraft were secured in 2008. Of the 10 aircraft, 7 aircraft were delivered in 2009 and 2010, and the remaining 3 aircraft have a delivery date in the first quarter 2011. At the delivery of the aircraft, pre-delivery payments are replaced with other long term financing. The Group has secured the financing of 2 aircraft in 2009 and 5 aircraft in 2010 through guarantees from the Ex-Im Bank of the United States and direct loans from the Private Export Funding Corporation. 2 aircraft were delivered and financed as sale and lease back transactions during 2010. The Group is currently in the process of securing a long term financing plan for 12 deliveries in 2011 and 2012. | ||||
The table below analyses the maturity profile of the Group’s financial liabilities at the balance sheet date. The amounts disclosed are the contractual undiscounted cash flows; | ||||
At 31 December 2010 (NOK 1 000) | Less than 1 year | Between 1 and 2 years | Between 2 and 5 years | Over 5 years |
Borrowings | 516 006 | 746 187 | 487 170 | 787 197 |
Financial lease liability | 4 966 | 4 001 | 12 004 | 4 001 |
Derivative contracts - payments | 773 768 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Trade and other payables | 1 063 436 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Interest on borrowings *) | 116 591 | 96 020 | 104 935 | 90 357 |
Total financial liabilities | 2 474 766 | 846 209 | 604 109 | 881 555 |
*) Calculated interests on borrowings | ||||
At 31 December 2009 (NOK 1 000) | Less than 1 year | Between 1 and 2 years | Between 2 and 5 years | Over 5 years |
Borrowings | 675 303 | 362 991 | 330 668 | 214 048 |
Financial lease liability | 5 100 | 5 100 | 13 737 | 10 615 |
Derivative contracts - payments | 1 227 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Trade and other payables | 746 549 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Interest on borrowings *) | 65 023 | 52 666 | 143 417 | 113 572 |
Total financial liabilities | 1 493 202 | 420 756 | 487 823 | 338 234 |
*) Calculated interests on borrowings | ||||
Capital risk management | ||||
The Group’s capital management policy is to have a capital structure which meets the demands of operations, reduces cost of capital, complies with financial covenants and future investments planned by the Group. The Group will at all times adjust debt and equity to maintain and secure optimal capital structure by continuously monitoring the gearing ratio of the Group. This ratio is calculated as net debt divided by total capital. Net debt is calculated as total borrowings (including ‘current and non-current borrowings’ less cash and cash equivalents as shown in the consolidated balance sheet). Total capital is calculated as ‘equity’ as shown in the consolidated balance sheet plus net debt. Net debt and gearing ratio are important factors in financial covenants as detailed in note 22. The management monitors these externally imposed financial covenants closely as a part of the Group’s capital risk management policy. | ||||
The Board of Directors has imposed an internal liquidity target which is closely monitored by the management. | ||||
The gearing ratios at 31 December 2010 and 2009 were as follows; | ||||
NOK 1 000 | 2010 | 2009 | ||
Total borrowings (note 22) | 2 484 882 | 1 583 010 | ||
Cash and cash equvalents (note 24) | 1 178 416 | 1 408 475 | ||
Net debt | 1 306 466 | 174 535 | ||
Total equity | 1 795 904 | 1 601 710 | ||
Total capital | 3 102 369 | 1 776 245 | ||
Gearing ratio | 42.1% | 9.8% | ||
Note 3 | Fair value estimation | |||
Fair value estimation | ||||
Financial instruments which are measured in the balance sheet at fair value, requires disclosures of fair value measurements by the following levels of fair value measurement hierarchy: | ||||
Level 1 | ||||
The fair value of financial instruments traded in active markets is based on quoted market prices at the balance sheet date. A market is regarded as active if quoted prices are readily and regularly available and represent actual and regular occurring market transactions on an arm’s length basis. | ||||
Level 2 | ||||
The fair value of financial instruments which are not traded in an active market is determined by using valuation techniques. These valuation techniques maximise the use of observable market data where it is available and rely as little as possible on entity specific estimates. Financial instruments in level 2 include forward contracts classified as derivatives. The fair values of forward foreign currency contracts and forward commodities contracts are determined using forward prices and rates at the balance sheet date, with the resulting value discounted back to present value. | ||||
Level 3 | ||||
If one or more of the significant inputs are not based on observable market data, specific valuation techniques are applied. Financial instruments included in level 3, relates to investments in unlisted shares in Silver Pensjonsforsikring which is classified as available-for-sale financial assets. See note 20 for additional details on available-for-sale financial assets. | ||||
The following table presents financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value at 31 December 2010; | ||||
(NOK 1 000) | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |
Assets | ||||
Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss | ||||
- Derivative financial instruments | 43 395 | 0 | 43 395 | |
Available-for-sale financial assets | 0 | 2 689 | 2 689 | |
Total assets | 43 395 | 2 689 | 46 084 | |
Liabilities | ||||
- Derivative financial liabilities | 15 003 | 0 | 15 003 | |
Total liabilities | 15 003 | 0 | 15 003 | |
The following table presents financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value at 31 December 2009; | ||||
(NOK 1 000) | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |
Assets | ||||
Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss | ||||
- Derivative financial instruments | 23 688 | 0 | 23 688 | |
Available-for-sale financial assets | 0 | 7 236 | 7 236 | |
Total assets | 23 688 | 7 236 | 30 924 | |
Liabilities | ||||
- Derivative financial liabilities | 1 227 | 0 | 1 227 | |
Total liabilities | 1 227 | 0 | 1 227 | |
There are no fair value calculations in level 1. | ||||
Note 4 | Segment information | |||
Executive management reviews the Group’s internal reporting in order to assess performance and allocate resources. Management has determined the operating segment based on these reports. Executive management considers the business as one operational segment, which is low cost air passenger travel. The Group’s operating profit come from airline-related activities and the Group’s main revenue generating assets is its aircraft fleet, which is utilized across the Group's geographical segment. | ||||
Performance is measured by executive management based on the operating segment’s earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). Other information is measured in accordance with the financial statements. | ||||
The table below shows revenues from low cost air passenger travel which is split between passenger revenue, ancillary revenue and other revenues. A separation between revenue of domestic and international flights is also included; | ||||
NOK 1 000 | 2010 | 2009 | ||
By activity: | ||||
Passenger transport | 7 210 161 | 6 389 406 | ||
Ancillary revenue | 1 034 006 | 788 655 | ||
Other revenues | 162 172 | 131 129 | ||
Total revenues | 8 406 339 | 7 309 189 | ||
By geographic market: | ||||
Domestic | 3 124 196 | 2 899 736 | ||
International | 5 282 143 | 4 409 454 | ||
Total revenues | 8 406 339 | 7 309 189 | ||
Other income amount to MNOK 191.3 (2009: 0) and include compensation from a SAS law suit and gains from sales of tangible assets (note 11). | ||||
Note 5 | Operational expenses | |||
NOK 1 000 | 2010 | 2009 | ||
Sales and distribution expenses | 167 859 | 149 415 | ||
Aviation fuel | 2 092 859 | 1 423 328 | ||
Aircraft leases | 778 411 | 620 114 | ||
Airport charges | 1 295 913 | 1 037 716 | ||
Handling charges | 863 551 | 722 658 | ||
Technical maintenance expenses | 697 196 | 659 796 | ||
Other operating expenses | 405 787 | 325 371 | ||
Total | 6 301 576 | 4 938 399 | ||
Note 5a | Other operating expenses | ||
Other operating expenses amount to MNOK 397.7 (2009: 396.1). Other operating expenses are related to operating the systems, marketing, back office, consultants and other costs not directly attributable to the operation of the aircraft fleet and related airline specific costs. | |||
Note 6 | Payroll expenses and number of employees | |||
NOK 1 000 | 2010 | 2009 | ||
Wages and salaries | 988 527 | 762 772 | ||
Social security tax | 169 173 | 138 472 | ||
Pension expenses | 153 827 | 138 485 | ||
Employee stock options | 7 100 | 8 437 | ||
Other benefits | 39 533 | 39 439 | ||
Hired crew personnel | 173 051 | 215 695 | ||
Total | 1 531 211 | 1 303 299 | ||
Payroll expenses include hired crew personnel. The employees are participants in defined benefit pension oplans. See note 18 for details. | ||||
Number of man-labour years *) | ||||
2010 | 2009 | |||
Norway | 1 845 | 1 494 | ||
Sweden | 287 | 113 | ||
Poland | 5 | 77 | ||
Total | 2 137 | 1 684 | ||
*) excluding man-labour years related to hired crew personnel | ||||
Note 7 | Remuneration of the Board of Directors and Executive Management | ||||||||
Remuneration of the Board of Directors | |||||||||
Total remuneration paid to the Board in 2010 was MNOK 0.7. The Chairman of the Board, Bjørn Kise, received MNOK 0.2. There were no bonuses or other forms of compensation paid to the Board members in 2010. | |||||||||
Directive of remuneration of the CEO and the Executive Management | |||||||||
The principles of leadership remuneration in Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA are to stimulate a strong and lasting profit oriented culture. The total compensation level should be competitive, however, not market leading compared to similar organizations. The Board determines the remuneration of the CEO, and the guidelines for remuneration of the Executive Management. The remuneration of the Board and the Executive Management must not have negative effects on the Group, nor damage the reputation and standing of the Group in the public eye. There have been no changes to the guidelines or principles of management remuneration during the year. The actual remuneration in 2010 was consistent with the guidelines and principles. | |||||||||
Compensation to the Executive Management should primarily consist of a fixed yearly salary with additional compensations such as a company car, free telephone, internet and newspapers, and a standard pension and insurance plan. Executive Management is also a part of the Group’s stock option plan. | |||||||||
The CEO does not receive compensation in form of performance based salary or bonuses, except for options in the stock option plan. The Executive Management can on an individual basis be awarded with a special compensation for profit enhancing projects. | |||||||||
The Executive Management is a part of the Group’s collective pension plan for salaries up to 12 G, which applies to all employees. The Senior Management has not been given any specific rights to terminate employment. | |||||||||
Total compensation year 2010 | |||||||||
NOK 1 000 | Fee | Salary | Bonus | Other benefits **) | Total Compensation | Pension expense ***) | |||
The Board of Directors | |||||||||
Bjørn Kise (chairman) | 193 | 193 | |||||||
Erik Gunnar Braathen (deputy chairman until 26/11/2009) | 83 | 83 | |||||||
Liv Berstad | 100 | 100 | |||||||
Ola Krohn-Fagervoll (deputy chairman from 5/11/2010) | 100 | 100 | |||||||
Marianne Wergeland Jenssen | 100 | 100 | |||||||
Thor Espen Bråthen*) | 35 | 35 | |||||||
Kenneth Utsikt*) | 35 | 35 | |||||||
Linda Olsen*) | 35 | 35 | |||||||
Total board of directors | 681 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 681 | 0 | |||
Executive Management | |||||||||
Bjørn Kjos (Chief Executive Officer) | 1 296 | 182 | 1 478 | a) | 127 | ||||
Frode Foss (Chief Financial Officer) | 1 362 | 125 | 1 487 | b) | 125 | ||||
Asgeir Nyseth (Chief Operating Officer) | 1 473 | 219 | 1 692 | c) | 143 | ||||
Hans-Petter Aanby (Chief IT Officer) | 1 378 | 116 | 1 494 | d) | 62 | ||||
Daniel Skjeldam (Chief Commercial Officer) | 1 400 | 126 | 1 526 | e) | 165 | ||||
Gunnar Martinsen (Senior Vice President HR and Organisation) | 1 010 | 210 | 1 220 | 389 | |||||
Anne-Sissel Skånvik (Senior Vice President Corporate Communications) | 1 054 | 121 | 1 175 | 143 | |||||
Total executive management | 0 | 8 973 | 0 | 1 099 | 10 072 | 1 154 | |||
*) For the employee representatives in the Board of Directors, only their fee for serving on the Board of Directors fee is stated. | |||||||||
**) Other benefits include company car, telephone, internet etc. | |||||||||
***) Pension expense reflects paid pension premium less employee contribution | |||||||||
a) Bjørn Kjos exercised share options in 2010 that has been reported as additional taxable income with NOK 214,634 | |||||||||
b) Frode Foss exercised share options in 2010 that has been reported as additional taxable income with NOK 176,569 | |||||||||
c) Asgeir Nyseth exercised share options in 2010 that has been reported as additional taxable income with NOK 177,369 | |||||||||
d) Hans-Petter Aanby exercised share options in 2010 that has been reported as additional taxable income with NOK 544,331 | |||||||||
e) Daniel Skjeldam exercised share options in 2010 that has been reported as additional taxable income with NOK 80,981 | |||||||||
Total compensation year 2009 | |||||||||
NOK 1 000 | Fee | Salary | Bonus | Other benefits **) | Total Compensation | Pension expense ***) | |||
The Board of Directors | |||||||||
Bjørn Kise (chairman) | 193 | 193 | |||||||
Erik Gunnar Braathen (deputy chairman until 11/26/2009) | 150 | 150 | |||||||
Liv Berstad | 100 | 100 | |||||||
Ola Krohn-Fagervoll | 100 | 100 | |||||||
Marianne Wergeland Jenssen | 100 | 100 | |||||||
Halvor Vatnar*) | 35 | 35 | |||||||
Sissel Gjelstad Vårum*) | 35 | 35 | |||||||
Monika Johansen*) | 35 | 35 | |||||||
Total Board of directors | 748 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 748 | 0 | |||
Executive Management | |||||||||
Bjørn Kjos (Chief Executive Officer) | 1 256 | 175 | 1 431 | a) | 127 | ||||
Frode Foss (Chief Financial Officer) | 1 110 | 118 | 1 228 | b) | 79 | ||||
Asgeir Nyseth (Chief Operating Officer) | 1 186 | 10 | 1 196 | c) | 121 | ||||
Hans-Petter Aanby (Chief IT Officer) | 1 110 | 116 | 1 226 | d) | 104 | ||||
Daniel Skjeldam (Chief Commercial Officer) | 1 055 | 99 | 1 154 | e) | 44 | ||||
Gunnar Martinsen (Senior Vice President HR and Organisation) | 826 | 18 | 844 | 105 | |||||
Anne-Sissel Skånvik (Senior Vice President Corporate Communications) | 825 | 111 | 936 | f) | 123 | ||||
Total executive management | 0 | 7 368 | 0 | 647 | 8 015 | 702 | |||
*) For the employee representatives in the Board of Directors, only their fee for serving on the Board of Directors fee is stated. | |||||||||
**) Other benefits include company car, telephone, internet etc. | |||||||||
***) Pension expense reflects paid pension premium less employee contribution | |||||||||
a) Bjørn Kjos excercised share options in 2009 that has been reported as additional taxable income with NOK 466,830. | |||||||||
b) Frode Foss excercised share options in 2009 that has been reported as additional taxable income with NOK 384,039. | |||||||||
c) Asgeir Nyseth excercised share options in 2009 that has been reported as additional taxable income with NOK 385,894. | |||||||||
d) Hans-Petter Aanby excercised share options in 2009 that has been reported as additional taxable income with NOK 384,735. | |||||||||
e) Daniel Skjeldam excercised share options in 2009 that has been reported as additional taxable income with NOK 176,249. | |||||||||
f) Anne-Sissel Skånvik was appointed in 2009, replacing former Senior Vice President Corporate Communications. | |||||||||
Shares and options owned by Senior Managers are presented in note 15. There are no outstanding loans or guarantees made to the Board of Directors or the Executive Management. | |||||||||
Audit remuneration (excl VAT) | |||||||||
NOK 1 000 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Audit fee | 1 221 | 1 294 | |||||||
Other audit related services | 112 | 2 738 | |||||||
Tax advisory | 204 | 534 | |||||||
Other services | 136 | 221 | |||||||
Total | 1 673 | 4 787 | |||||||
Note 8 | Net financial items | ||||
NOK 1 000 | 2010 | 2009 | |||
Interest income | 40 292 | 23 206 | |||
Interest expense | -40 159 | -20 933 | |||
Net foreign exchange (loss) or gain | 24 793 | 39 311 | |||
Appreciation cash equivalents | 10 007 | 6 127 | |||
Impairment available-for-sale financial assets | -7 314 | 0 | |||
Fair value adjustment long term deposits | -1 001 | 152 | |||
Other financial items | -17 | 110 | |||
Total | 26 600 | 47 974 | |||
Foreign exchange derivatives and fuel derivatives are categorized as financial assets or financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss and are measured at fair value at each balance sheet date with changes in fair value recognized as other gains and losses within operating expenses. | |||||
Non interest bearing deposits for aircraft leases are initially measured at fair value and a periodic interest income is calculated using the same interest rate as for fair value calculation. | |||||
Impairment of financial assets relate to investment in Silver Pensjonsforsikring, classified as available-for-sale financial assets. An impairment loss is recognized in the income statement in 2010 as fair value of the investment is significantly below initial cost. See note 3 for fair value estimation and note 20 for further information concerning available-for–sale financial assets. | |||||
Interest expense includes amortized cost on borrowings. | |||||
Note 9 | Tax | |||||
This year's tax expense consists of (NOK 1 000): | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
Tax payable | 976 | 111 158 | ||||
Tax paid in current year on current year income | 0 | 1 241 | ||||
Change in deferred tax | 71 239 | 64 390 | ||||
Income tax expense | 72 214 | 176 789 | ||||
Reconciliation from nominal to effective tax rate: | ||||||
NOK 1 000 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
Profit before tax | 243 098 | 623 040 | ||||
Expected tax expense using nominal tax rate (28 %) | 68 067 | 174 451 | ||||
Tax effect of the following items: | ||||||
Non deductible expenses | 4 237 | -487 | ||||
Adjustment from previous year | 0 | 6 874 | ||||
Tax rate outside Norway other than 28% | -90 | -4 051 | ||||
Tax expense | 72 214 | 176 789 | ||||
Effective tax rate | 29.71% | 28.38% | ||||
The following table details deferred tax assets and liabilities; | ||||||
Deferred tax | Assets 2010 | Liabilities 2010 | Assets 2009 | Liabilities 2009 | ||
Intangible assets | 0 | -6 274 | 0 | -4 533 | ||
Tangible assets | 13 | -88 286 | 0 | -5 965 | ||
Long term receivables and borrowings in foreign currency | 0 | -8 142 | 0 | -16 853 | ||
Inventories | 0 | 1 192 | 0 | 1 167 | ||
Receivables | 155 | 11 659 | -13 | 20 071 | ||
Financial instruments | 0 | -7 950 | 0 | -6 289 | ||
Derferred gains/losses | 0 | -3 108 | 0 | 35 | ||
Other accruals | 0 | 32 564 | 0 | 29 980 | ||
Pensions | 0 | 34 068 | 0 | 27 316 | ||
Other temporary differences | 0 | -55 207 | 0 | -62 736 | ||
Loss carried forward | 103 | 0 | 170 | 0 | ||
Gross deferred tax assets and liabilities | 270 | -89 483 | 157 | -17 806 | ||
Reconciliation of deferred tax assets and liabilities | Assets 2010 | Liabilities 2010 | Assets 2009 | Liabilities 2009 | ||
Recognized at 1 January | 157 | -17 806 | 59 759 | -9 695 | ||
Charged/credited to the income statement | 103 | -71 342 | -54 179 | -10 211 | ||
Charged directly to equity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 109 | ||
Translation differences | 10 | -336 | -5 422 | -9 | ||
Recognized at 31 December | 270 | -89 483 | 157 | -17 806 | ||
The Group has recognized MNOK 0.3 as a deferred tax asset in 2010. Deferred tax asset is based on unused tax loss carry forwards and temporary differences in assets and liabilities. The tax loss carried forward is expected to be utilized by future taxable profits. Deferred tax liability is based on allocation of purchase price of Norwegian Air Shuttle Sweden AB to fair values, as well as temporary differences in assets and liabilities. | ||||||
Note 10 | Intangible assets | |||||||
Other intangible assets | ||||||||
NOK 1 000 | Software | Goodwill | Indefinite life | Definite life | Total | |||
Acquisition cost 1 January 2009 | 108 504 | 101 853 | 24 098 | 73 919 | 308 374 | |||
Additions | 43 660 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43 660 | |||
Translation differences | 0 | -7 695 | -1 692 | -715 | -10 103 | |||
Acquisition cost 31 December 2009 | 152 164 | 94 157 | 22 406 | 73 203 | 341 932 | |||
Acquisition cost 1 January 2010 | 152 164 | 94 157 | 22 406 | 73 203 | 341 932 | |||
Additions | 50 174 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 171 | |||
Translation differences | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
Acquisition cost 31 December 2010 | 202 334 | 94 157 | 22 406 | 73 203 | 392 102 | |||
Accumulated amortisation 1 January 2009 | 61 712 | 0 | 0 | 48 588 | 110 300 | |||
Amortisation | 23 013 | 0 | 0 | 16 436 | 39 449 | |||
Translation differences | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 637 | 1 637 | |||
Accumulated amortization 31 December 2009 | 84 725 | 0 | 0 | 66 661 | 151 386 | |||
Accumulated amortisation 1 January 2010 | 84 725 | 0 | 0 | 66 661 | 151 386 | |||
Amortisation | 27 509 | 0 | 0 | 2 782 | 30 291 | |||
Translation differences | 0 | 0 | 0 | 131 | 131 | |||
Accumulated amortization 31 December 2010 | 112 234 | 0 | 0 | 69 574 | 181 808 | |||
Book value at 31 December 2009 | 67 438 | 94 157 | 22 406 | 6 543 | 190 543 | |||
Book value at 31 December 2010 | 90 100 | 94 157 | 22 406 | 3 630 | 210 293 | |||
Useful life | 3-5 years | Indefenite | Indefenite | See below | ||||
Amortization plan | Linear | Linear | None | Linear | ||||
Capitalized software is related to external consulting fees for the development of Norwegian's own systems for booking and ticket-less travel, various sales portals, back office and new maintenance system (AMOS). These costs are amortized over their estimated useful lives (three to five years). | ||||||||
Other intangible assets and goodwill are related to the purchase of Norwegian Air Shuttle Sweden AB on 31 July 2007. Other intangible assets from business combinations consist of estimated fair value of Brand name, charter operations, slots and the Air Operating Certificate. Other intangible assets also consist of intellectual property rights which are related to purchases of internet domains. The Group has developed web portals in Norway, Sweden and Denmark. | ||||||||
Goodwill, slots and intellectual property rights are determined to have indefinite economic lives, and are not amortized. Slots and intellectual property rights do not expire over time, as long as the management has the intention to continue using the slots. | ||||||||
Brand name, charter operations and air operating certificate have definite lives and are amortized over their economic useful lives. Charter operations and brand name were fully depreciated in 2009. Air operating certificate was initially defined to have an indefinite life at the date of acquisition. However, due to restructuring of the Swedish operations, the air operating certificate was determined to have a definite life of 12 months from 1 March 2009. Air operating certificate was fully depreciated in 2010. | ||||||||
Impairment testing of goodwill and intangible assets | ||||||||
The Group tests goodwill and assets with indefinite useful lives annually at year end for impairment. Intangible assets with definite lives are tested for impairment if indicators of impairment are identified. | ||||||||
The method used to estimate the recoverable amount is value in use, based on discounted cash flow analysis. The analysis reflects the cash flow projections in the financial business plan covering the next year which is approved by the Senior Management. The calculation also includes the estimated cash flows for the next 5 years. Key assumptions used in the calculation are growth rates, operating costs, terminal value and discount rate. Cash flow beyond the 5 year period is extrapolated with a long term growth rate. Estimated cash flow and discount rate is after tax. | ||||||||
Discount rate | ||||||||
The discount rate which is used is 8.8% and based on Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC). The cost of the Group's debt and equity capital, weighted accordingly to reflect its capital structure, gives its weighted average cost of capital. The WACC rates which are used to discount the future cash flows are based on market risk free interest rate adjusted for inflation differential and also take into account the debt premium, market risk premium, gearing corporate tax rate and asset beta. An increase of the discount rate by 1% will not result in impairment of goodwill. | ||||||||
Growth rates | ||||||||
The basis for calculating future growth rate is next year management approved budget, and an estimated sales growth rate based on planned production increase, expansion of route portfolio and expected increase in market share. | ||||||||
Operating costs | ||||||||
The operating costs are calculated based on the budget period and on estimated future development. Committed operations efficiency programs and the planned operating expansion are taken into account. Changes in the outcome of these initiatives may affect future estimated operating costs. A permanent increase of 1% of total costs, with all other assumptions remaining equal, will not result in impairment of assets. | ||||||||
Terminal value | ||||||||
A growth rate of 2% is used in calculating cash flow beyond the 5 year period. | ||||||||
Sensitivity | ||||||||
At 31 December 2010, the Group’s value in use was significantly higher than the carrying amount of its goodwill and intangible assets. The impairment calculation is not particularly sensitive to changes in assumptions. | ||||||||
Note 11 | Tangible assets | ||||||||
NOK 1 000 | Buildings | Aircraft | Prepayment Boeing Contract | Equipment and fixtures | Financial lease | Total | |||
Acquisition cost at 1 January 2009 | 3 933 | 647 242 | 705 165 | 80 725 | 0 | 1 464 065 | |||
Additions | 0 | 546 073 | 705 827 | 19 606 | 26 468 | 1 297 974 | |||
Disposals | 0 | -16 557 | 0 | -238 | 0 | -16 795 | |||
Acquisition cost at 31 December 2009 | 3 933 | 1 203 758 | 1 410 992 | 100 093 | 26 468 | 2 745 244 | |||
Acquisition cost at 1 January 2010 | 3 933 | 1 203 758 | 1 410 992 | 100 093 | 26 468 | 2 745 244 | |||
Additions | 5 592 | 1 255 482 | 591 608 | 12 867 | 8 139 | 1 873 688 | |||
Disposals | 0 | -7 844 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -7 844 | |||
Acquisition cost at 31 December 2010 | 9 525 | 2 451 396 | 2 002 600 | 112 960 | 34 607 | 4 611 088 | |||
Accumulated depreciation at 1 January 2009 | 0 | 150 566 | 0 | 49 533 | 0 | 200 099 | |||
Depreciation | 0 | 89 281 | 0 | 19 776 | 376 | 109 433 | |||
Reversals | 0 | -10 981 | 0 | -121 | 0 | -11 102 | |||
Accumulated depreciation at 31 December 2009 | 0 | 228 866 | 0 | 69 188 | 376 | 298 430 | |||
Accumulated depreciation at 1 January 2010 | 0 | 228 866 | 0 | 69 188 | 376 | 298 430 | |||
Depreciation | 0 | 135 792 | 0 | 17 597 | 3 028 | 156 417 | |||
Reversals | 0 | -5 399 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -5 399 | |||
Accumulated depreciation at 31 December 2010 | 0 | 359 259 | 0 | 86 785 | 3 404 | 449 448 | |||
Book value at 31 December 2009 | 3 933 | 974 892 | 1 410 992 | 30 905 | 26 092 | 2 446 814 | |||
Book value at 31 December 2010 | 9 525 | 2 092 136 | 2 002 600 | 26 175 | 31 203 | 4 161 638 | |||
Estimated useful life, depreciation plan and residual value is as follows: | |||||||||
Useful life | See below | See below | See below | 3-9 years | 4-20 years | ||||
Depreciation plan | See below | Linear | See below | Linear | Linear | ||||
Residual value | 100% | See below | See below | 0% | 0% | ||||
At 31 December 2010, the Group operated a total of 57 aircraft; 12 which were owned and 45 which were leased under operational leases. Operational leases are detailed in note 12. | |||||||||
Aircraft | |||||||||
The Group acquired 5 Boeing 737-800 HGW aircraft during 2010 and 2 aircraft during 2009. Aircraft is decomposed and depreciated over the economic useful life of each component on a straight-line basis. The body of the aircraft is depreciated based on economic useful years, while other components are based on airborne hours and cycles. | |||||||||
The residual value is MNOK 563.6 in total for all owned aircraft and deducted from the depreciable amount of the body of the aircraft. The life expectancy of the body of the aircraft is 25 years for 737 aircraft, and the economic life of the owned aircraft is 25 years less the age of the aircraft at time of purchase. | |||||||||
Installations on leased aircraft | |||||||||
The installations on the leased aircraft include cabin interior modifications and other improvements to the aircraft after lease commencement. The capitalized value is depreciated over the remainder of the aircraft lease, which is between 1-10 years. Linear depreciation is applied and residual value is NOK 0. In 2010 and 2009 several engines on the leased aircraft were in overhaul, and replacement costs for life limited parts were capitalized to the extent that the costs were improvements to the engines and therefore exceeding the requirements which were specified in the leasing contracts. These components are depreciated at a defined rate per engine cycle, limited to the remainder of the aircraft lease. | |||||||||
Spare parts | |||||||||
Spare parts consist of rotable parts for aircraft and are depreciated over their useful life. The useful life of spare parts ranges between 4-10 years. Linear depreciation is applied and 25% of the acquisition cost is calculated as residual value. | |||||||||
Buildings | |||||||||
Buildings consist of 3 apartments in Berlin, purchased in 2007 for the purpose of housing crew and trainees stationed in Berlin on a temporary basis. In 2010, the Group purchased an apartment in Seattle for the purpose of housing personnel stationed in Seattle concerning the delivery of new 737-800 HGW aircraft. Buildings are carried at acquisition cost. The residual value is estimated to equal the acquisition cost. | |||||||||
Prepayments on Boeing contract | |||||||||
In 2007 the Group entered a purchase contract with Boeing Corporation concerning 42 new 737-800 HGW aircraft, with an option of purchasing 42 additional aircraft. Two aircraft were delivered in 2009, and five aircraft were delivered in 2010. 21 purchase options have been exercised. 54 aircraft will be delivered i between 2011 and 2016. Until delivery of the aircraft, the Group will make prepayments to Boeing, following a defined prepayment schedule. The Group capitalizes borrowing costs incurred for the construction of qualifying assets during the period of time which is required to complete the aircraft. Borrowing costs of MNOK 73.9 (2009: MNOK 33.5) have been capitalized during the year. An average capitalization rate of 6.1% (2009: 7.6%) was used. | |||||||||
Financial lease assets | |||||||||
In 2009, the Group entered lease agreements concerning de-ice equipment and electronic flight bag equipment. The lease agreements are classified as financial leases as all risks and rewards are transferred to the Group after the end of the lease agreement. The financial lease assets are depreciated over their economic useful lives. De-ice equipment is depreciated over 20 years, while electronic flight bag equipment is depreciated over 4 years. Residual value of financial lease assets is 0. | |||||||||
Impairment of tangible assets | |||||||||
In 2010 and 2009 the management determined that the total operations of the Group were its cash generating unit, and as such, there is only one operational segment in the Group. Impairment testing of tangible assets are covered by impairment testing on the whole Group. See note 10 for details. | |||||||||
No impairment losses have been recognized in 2010. | |||||||||
For information regarding assets pledged as collateral for debt, see note 23. | |||||||||
Note 12 | Operating leases | |||||||
The lease agreements on the Boeing 737 aircraft last between 3 and 10 years from the date of agreement, with some extension options. From 2002 to 2008, 29 aircraft were delivered. In 2009, 8 aircraft were delivered and 8 aircraft were delivered in 2010. Renegotiations have resulted in extensions on some of the shorter leases. Contracts for 13 of the aircraft will expire in 2011, and contracts for 5 of the aircraft expire in 2012. These aircraft will be redelivered according to schedule. The remaining contracts expire in 2013 or later. | ||||||||
Leasing costs expensed on aircraft lease within operational expenses was MNOK 778.5 in 2010 (2009: MNOK 574). Included in leasing costs are operating lease costs on two aircraft from the sale and lease back transaction. | ||||||||
In addition, the Group leases 15 cars, and 11 properties in Oslo, Stavanger, Stockholm and Copenhagen. Leasing costs related to cars and properties expensed in other operating expenses in 2010 was MNOK 50.1 (2009: MNOK 21.2) | ||||||||
Annual minimum rent on non-cancellable operating lease agreements per 31 December 2010 is as follows: | ||||||||
Nominal value 2010 | Nominal value 2009 | |||||||
NOK 1 000 | Aircrafts | Cars | Property | Total | Aircrafts | Cars | Property | Total |
Within one year | 1 163 166 | 4 343 | 20 815 | 1 188 324 | 887 912 | 3 910 | 17 082 | 908 905 |
Between 1 and 5 years | 3 333 379 | 15 105 | 47 957 | 3 396 442 | 2 448 487 | 14 220 | 36 668 | 2 499 375 |
After 5 years | 1 287 069 | 3 555 | 10 919 | 1 301 544 | 724 171 | 7 110 | 13 233 | 744 514 |
The aircraft's minimum lease payments consists of ordinary lease payments, contractual payments for maintenance reserves and expensed deferred lease payments resulting from non interest bearing deposits paid at inception of lease agreement. Aircraft leases committed through letter of intent are not included in the table above. | ||||||||
Note 13 | Trade and other Receivables | |||
Spesification of receivables | ||||
NOK 1 000 | 2010 | 2009 | ||
Trade receivables | 136 047 | 87 533 | ||
Credit card receivables | 382 751 | 435 773 | ||
Deposits | 61 554 | 60 211 | ||
Deferred leasing costs | 10 893 | 3 491 | ||
Prepaid costs | 30 703 | 20 376 | ||
Public duty debt | 57 238 | 88 698 | ||
Reimbursements claims maintenance costs | 174 697 | 131 786 | ||
Other claims | 22 399 | 9 996 | ||
Prepayments to employees | 76 | 1 109 | ||
Prepaid rent | 19 027 | 17 311 | ||
Total | 895 385 | 856 284 | ||
Due dates | ||||
NOK 1 000 | 2010 | 2009 | ||
Within one year | 842 143 | 829 893 | ||
After 1 year | 53 242 | 26 391 | ||
Total | 895 385 | 856 284 | ||
Currency (NOK 1 000) | 2010 | 2009 | ||
DKK | 68 047 | 30 698 | ||
EUR | 23 454 | 62 159 | ||
GBP | 1 895 | 14 610 | ||
NOK | 204 051 | 457 557 | ||
USD | 46 736 | 212 303 | ||
SEK | 164 470 | 72 390 | ||
PLN | 1 554 | 6 567 | ||
Fair value of trade and other receivables | ||||
NOK 1 000 | 2010 | 2009 | ||
Due within one year | 842 143 | 829 893 | ||
After one year *) | 42 287 | 22 706 | ||
Total | 884 430 | 852 600 | ||
For receivables due within one year, fair value is equal to nominal value. | ||||
*) Discount rate 4.5 % (2009:5.5 %) | ||||
Provision for bad debt | ||||
NOK 1 000 | 2010 | 2009 | ||
Balance 1 January | 31 655 | 30 269 | ||
Utilized | -15 600 | -2 775 | ||
Accruals | 32 696 | 23 972 | ||
Reversals | -4 200 | -19 810 | ||
Balance 31 December | 44 552 | 31 655 | ||
Changes in provision for bad debt is recognized as other operating expenses. | ||||
Overdue accounts receivables | ||||
NOK 1 000 | 2010 | 2009 | ||
Overdue less than 1 month | 3 100 | 6 078 | ||
Overdue 1-2 months | 1 218 | 5 919 | ||
Overdue 2-3 months | 3 054 | 2 071 | ||
Overdue over 3 months | 15 408 | 18 457 | ||
Total | 22 780 | 32 525 | ||
Provision for bad debt includes trade – and credit card receivables. The majority of the provision relates to fraud from credit card transactions. The remaining provision for bad debt on trade receivables relates to provision for overdue receivables that are not impaired at 31 December. | ||||
Overdue accounts receivable includes trade receivables and credit card receivables. The maturity of overdue accounts receivables relates to trade receivables. Accounts more than 3 months overdue mainly consist of receivables from customers who are also suppliers to the Group. The credit risk for such receivables is limited as the risk is offset against slow processing of payables to the same suppliers. | ||||
Maximum exposure to credit risk at 31 December 2010 is MNOK 693.5 (2009: MNOK 655.1). | ||||
Non interest bearing deposits are measured at amortized cost in the balance sheet. Deposits denominated in foreign currency are converted using the prevailing exchange rates on the balance sheet date. | ||||
Note 14 | Inventories | |||
NOK 1 000 | 2010 | 2009 | ||
Consumables | 54 633 | 31 928 | ||
Parts for heavy maintenance | 7 928 | 7 917 | ||
Other inventory | 3 630 | 980 | ||
Total | 66 191 | 40 825 | ||
In 2010 and 2009 the Group bought parts removed from aircraft engines in relation to heavy maintenance. These parts are held for sale and sold in secondary markets. Charges for obsolete product in 2010 were MNOK 4.3 (2009: MNOK 4.6). | ||||
Note 15 | Equity and shareholder information | ||||||
At 31 December the share capital consists of the following share classes; | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Issued shares | 34 573 332 | 34 209 858 | |||||
Own shares | 0 | 0 | |||||
Net Shares | 34 573 332 | 34 209 858 | |||||
There is only one class of shares, and all shares have equal rights. Per value per share is NOK 0.1 | |||||||
(NOK 1 000) | Number of shares | Ordinary shares | Share premium | Total | |||
01 January 2009 | 32 359 779 | 3 236 | 789 130 | 792 366 | |||
Share issue 2 November 2009 | 230 079 | 23 | 7 353 | 7 376 | |||
Share issue 18 November 2009 | 1 620 000 | 162 | 245 411 | 245 573 | |||
31 December 2009 | 34 209 858 | 3 421 | 1 041 894 | 1 045 315 | |||
Share issue 29 October 2010 | 363 474 | 36 | 13 189 | 13 225 | |||
31 December 2010 | 34 572 332 | 3 457 | 1 055 083 | 1 058 540 | |||
All issued shares are fully paid with a par value of 0.1 NOK per share (2009: 0.1 NOK per share). The share issue at 29 October 2010 was related to exercise of employee share options with an exercise price of NOK 63.8. For additional information about the employee share options, see note 17. | |||||||
Description of items booked directly on shareholders equity: | |||||||
Translation differences | |||||||
MNOK 0.3 has been booked as comprehensive income at 31 December 2010 (2009: MNOK -5). The translation differences arise from consolidating the subsidiaries Norwegian Air Shuttle Polska SP.zo.o and Norwegian Air Shuttle Sweden AB into Group accounts. | |||||||
Expenses for share issue | |||||||
Expenses for share issue, net of tax, in the amount of MNOK 0 (2009: MNOK 5.4) have been booked directly in shareholder equity. | |||||||
Stock option plan | |||||||
Stock options are granted to the management and the employees. In 2008, the employees were granted stock options in exchange for a voluntary reduction in salary, first part of this option plan was exercised in November 2009 and second part of the plan was exercised in November 2010. Options were also granted to the management in 2009, with expiry in 2010 and 2011. The Group granted a stock options plan in 2010 similar to the grant in 2008, where employees were granted stock options in exchange for a voluntary reduction in salary. The 2010 employee stock option plan will be exercised after announcing the third quarterly results for 2011 and 2012. See note 17 for further details. Total stock option expense in 2010 was MNOK 7.1 (2009: MNOK 8.4). | |||||||
Shareholder structure | |||||||
The largest shareholders at 31 December 2010 were: | |||||||
Owner- | Voting- | ||||||
A-shares | ship | rights | |||||
HBK INVEST AS | 9 499 023 | 27.48% | 27.48% | ||||
AWILCO INVEST AS | 2 235 857 | 6.47% | 6.47% | ||||
SKAGEN KON-TIKI | 1 661 249 | 4.81% | 4.81% | ||||
FINNAIR PLC | 1 649 839 | 4.77% | 4.77% | ||||
VITAL FORSIKRING ASA | 1 502 197 | 4.34% | 4.34% | ||||
SKAGEN VEKST | 1 324 950 | 3.83% | 3.83% | ||||
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK | 933 566 | 2.70% | 2.70% | ||||
DNB NOR NORGE (IV)V | 832 885 | 2.41% | 2.41% | ||||
STATE STREET BANK AN | 699 273 | 2.02% | 2.02% | ||||
GOLDMAN SACHS INT. | 566 000 | 1.64% | 1.64% | ||||
HOLBERG NORGE | 510 461 | 1.48% | 1.48% | ||||
HOLBERG NORDEN | 495 954 | 1.43% | 1.43% | ||||
SKANDINAVISKE ENSKILDA | 461 329 | 1.33% | 1.33% | ||||
DANSKE INVEST NORSKE | 453 765 | 1.31% | 1.31% | ||||
KLP AKSJE NORGE VPF | 350 553 | 1.01% | 1.01% | ||||
AVANSE NORGE (II) VP | 350 425 | 1.01% | 1.01% | ||||
DNB NOR SMB VPF | 336 018 | 0.97% | 0.97% | ||||
STATE STREET BANK AN | 328 547 | 0.95% | 0.95% | ||||
KOMMUNAL LANDSPENSJONSKASSE | 279 999 | 0.81% | 0.81% | ||||
STATE STREET BANK & | 272 811 | 0.79% | 0.79% | ||||
Other | 9 828 628 | 28.43% | 28.43% | ||||
Total number of shares | 34 573 332 | 100% | 100% | ||||
Shareholder structure | |||||||
The largest shareholders at 31 December 2009 were: | |||||||
Owner- | Voting- | ||||||
A-shares | ship | rights | |||||
HBK INVEST AS | 9 499 116 | 27.77% | 27.77% | ||||
AWILCO INVEST AS | 2 320 000 | 6.78% | 6.78% | ||||
FINNAIR PLC | 1 649 862 | 4.82% | 4.82% | ||||
SKAGEN KON-TIKI | 1 603 900 | 4.69% | 4.69% | ||||
SKAGEN VEKST | 1 298 700 | 3.80% | 3.80% | ||||
DNB NOR NORGE (IV) V | 820 340 | 2.40% | 2.40% | ||||
VITAL FORSIKRING ASA | 767 187 | 2.24% | 2.24% | ||||
HOLBERG NORGE | 566 760 | 1.66% | 1.66% | ||||
GOLDMAN SACHS INT. - EQUITY - | 538 580 | 1.57% | 1.57% | ||||
HOLBERG NORDEN | 505 956 | 1.48% | 1.48% | ||||
SEB ENKILDA ASA - EGENKAPITAL - | 406 808 | 1.19% | 1.19% | ||||
PENSJONSKASSEN STATOIL | 392 671 | 1.15% | 1.15% | ||||
STATE STREET BANK AN | 368 858 | 1.08% | 1.08% | ||||
STATE STREET BANK | 339 576 | 0.99% | 0.99% | ||||
KLP LK AKSJER | 300 000 | 0.88% | 0.88% | ||||
WARRENWICKLUND NORGE | 247 184 | 0.72% | 0.72% | ||||
SHB STOCKHOLM CLIENT | 222 210 | 0.65% | 0.65% | ||||
BARCLAYS CAPITAL SEC | 200 000 | 0.58% | 0.58% | ||||
DNB NOR SMB VPF | 198 811 | 0.58% | 0.58% | ||||
KLP AKSJENORGE | 197 500 | 0.58% | 0.58% | ||||
Other | 11 765 839 | 34.39% | 34.39% | ||||
Total number of shares | 34 209 858 | 100% | 100% | ||||
Shares and options directly or indirectly held by members of the Boards of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and Executive Management; | |||||||
Name | Title | Shares 1) | Options | ||||
Bjørn Kise 2) | Chairman | 781 537 | - | ||||
Ola Krohn Fagervoll | Deputy chairman | 15 462 | - | ||||
Liv Berstad | Board Member | - | - | ||||
Marianne Wergeland Jenssen | Board Member | 800 | - | ||||
Linda Olsen | Board Member - Employee repr | - | - | ||||
Thor Espen Bråten | Board Member - Employee repr | 3 634 | - | ||||
Kenneth Utsikt | Board Member - Employee repr | 1 497 | 578 | ||||
Bjørn Kjos 3) | Chief Executive Officer | 7 999 477 | 48 184 | ||||
Frode E Foss | Chief Financial Officer | 30 000 | 44 679 | ||||
Hans-Petter Aanby | Chief IT Officer | - | 24 760 | ||||
Asgeir Nyseth | Chief Operating Officer | 5 200 | 44 931 | ||||
Daniel Skjeldam | Chief Commercial Officer | - | 42 312 | ||||
Anne-Sissel Skånvik | Senior Vice President Corporate Communications | - | 20 000 | ||||
Gunnar Martinsen | Senior Vice President HR and Organisation | 8 432 | 21 736 | ||||
1) Including shares held by related parties | |||||||
2) Bjørn Kise holds 8.2 % of HBK invest AS | |||||||
3) Bjørn Kjos holds 84.1 % of HBK Invest AS | |||||||
Specification of other reserves | |||||||
Available-for-sale financial assets | Translation differences | Total | |||||
01 January 2009 | -4 376 | -3 257 | -7 633 | ||||
Available for sale financial assets | 1 608 | 0 | 1 608 | ||||
Translation differences | 0 | -5 007 | -5 007 | ||||
1 January 2010 | -2 768 | -8 264 | -11 032 | ||||
Available for sale financial assets | 2 768 | 0 | 2 768 | ||||
Translation differences | 0 | 320 | 320 | ||||
31 December 2010 | 0 | -7 944 | -7 944 | ||||
Other paid-in capital consists of accumulated stock option expenses. | |||||||
Note 16 | Earnings per share | |||
Basic earnings per share calculations are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, while diluted earnings per share calculations are performed using the average number of common shares and dilutive common shares equivalents outstanding during each period. | ||||
NOK 1 000 | 2010 | 2009 | ||
Profit | 170 884 | 446 251 | ||
Average number of shares outstanding | 34 272 595 | 32 499 404 | ||
Average number of shares and options outstanding | 34 991 268 | 33 463 429 | ||
Basic earnings per share | 4.97 | 13.73 | ||
Basic earnings per share restated | 13.01 | |||
Diluted earnings per share | 4.87 | 13.34 | ||
Diluted earnings per share restated | 12.89 | |||
2010 | 2009 | |||
Average number of shares outstanding | 34 272 595 | 32 499 404 | ||
Dilutional effects | ||||
Stock options | 718 673 | 964 025 | ||
Average number of shares outstanding adjusted for dilutional effects | 34 991 268 | 33 463 429 | ||
In 2010, underwritten rights issues of 363,474 new shares were issued by the parent company at a share price of NOK 67 per share. Market share price prior to the day of issue was NOK 91.5 per share. The bonus in share price is reflected in basic earnings per share. An adjustment factor of 1.003 is used in the calculation | ||||
Note 17 | Options | |||||||||
The Board issued 561,301 stock options to employees on 10 September 2008 in accordance with the authorization from the extraordinary general meeting on 5 August 2008. The stock options had an exercise price of NOK 32.06, equal to the 30% discounted volume weighted share price during the period 26-29 August 2008. All options were exercised in 2009 and 2010. | ||||||||||
On 20 July 2009 the Board issued, in accordance with the authorization from the general meeting, 384,000 stock options to the management and key personnel. The stock options have an exercise price of NOK 67.00, equal to the average share price the last trading days prior to the date of issue, plus 10%. The stock options may be exercised within a period of two years and 3 months, whereas the first 50% of the stock options were vested on 20 July 2010, and the second 50% of the stock options will vest on 20 July 2011. | ||||||||||
The Board issued 292,021 stock options to employees on 1 October 2010 in accordance with the authorization from the general meeting. The stock options have an exercise price of NOK 63.8, equal to the 30% discounted volume weighted share price during the period 20 -23 September 2010. The stock options may be exercised within a period of two years, whereas the first 50% of the stock options will vest on 1 October 2011 and the second 50% of the stock options will vest on 1 October 2012. Stock options which are not exercised within 31 October 2012 will expire. | ||||||||||
The stock option program is expensed linear at fair value over the vesting period. The cost is offset in other paid in capital. Fair value calculations are conducted using Black & Scholes option pricing model. There are no market conditions linked to the vesting of the options. | ||||||||||
The following estimates are used in calculating fair value; | ||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Dividend (%) | 0% | 0% | ||||||||
Expected volatility (%) | 52.52% | 58.01% | ||||||||
Historic volatility (%) | 52.52% | 58.01% | ||||||||
Risk free interest (%) | 2.13% | 2.13% | ||||||||
Expected lifetime (year) | 2.25 | 2.25 | ||||||||
Share price at grant date | 93.00 | 59.50 | ||||||||
Expected lifetime assumes that stock options are exercised at expiration. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility over the most recent period that corresponds with the expected life of the option. There is a cap on the options granted in 2009 limiting the proceeds from the options to three times the participants' annual base salary. Furthermore, the participants in the 2010 - program must cover the social security tax incurred for option gains where the share price exceeds NOK 127.6. These limitations are taken into account when calculating the option values. | ||||||||||
The option program is expensed with MNOK 7.1 in 2010 and MNOK 8.4 in 2009. | ||||||||||
2010 | Weighted avg. | 2009 | Weighted avg. | |||||||
Shares | exerc. Price | Shares | exerc. Price | |||||||
Outstanding at the beginning of the period | 710 601 | 50.9 | 829 690 | 77.8 | ||||||
Allocated | 292 021 | 63.8 | 384 000 | 67.0 | ||||||
Exercised | 371 601 | 39.2 | 230 080 | 32.1 | ||||||
Terminated | 214 | 63.8 | 4 009 | 32.1 | ||||||
Forfeited | 1 000 | 67.0 | 0 | 0.0 | ||||||
Expired | 0 | 0.0 | 269 000 | 173.1 | ||||||
Outstanding at the end of the period | 629 807 | 65.5 | 710 601 | 50.9 | ||||||
Vested options | 146 500 | 67.0 | 48 290 | 32.1 | ||||||
Weighted average fair value of options allocated in the period | 292 021 | 38.1 | 384 000 | 15.4 | ||||||
2010 | Outstanding options | Vested options | ||||||||
Strike price (NOK) | Outstanding options by 31 December 2010 | Weighted average remaining lifetime (yrs) | Weighted average strike price | Vested options by 31 December 2010 | Weighted average strike price | |||||
50.00-66.00 | 291 807 | 1.8 | 63.8 | 0 | 0 | |||||
66.00-70.00 | 338 000 | 0.8 | 67.0 | 146 500 | 67.0 | |||||
Total | 629 807 | 1.4 | 65.5 | 146 500 | 67.0 | |||||
2009 | Outstanding options | Vested options | ||||||||
Strike price (NOK) | Outstanding options by 31 December 2009 | Weighted average remaining lifetime (yrs) | Weighted average strike price | Vested options by 31 December 2009 | Weighted average strike price | |||||
0.00 - 35.00 | 326 601 | 0.8 | 32.1 | 48 290 | 32.1 | |||||
35.00 - | 384 000 | 1.8 | 67.0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
Total | 710 601 | 1.4 | 50.9 | 48 290 | 32.1 | |||||
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has implemented a share purchase savings program for the employees, where the employees, by salary deductions, purchase shares in the parent company and the company will fund up to 50% of the purchased shares, limited to NOK 6 000 per year. In addition the company will distribute bonus shares depending on the total amount of purchased shares per employee. | ||||||||||
Fair value of the bonus shares are measured at the grant date using Black & Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of the bonus shares and the corresponding estimated social security cost are expensed as personnel costs over the vesting period. Changes in estimated social security cost are expensed over the remaining vesting period. At 31 December 2010, MNOK 1.5 (2009: MNOK 1.5) was expensed and included in the stock options expense of MNOK 7.1. | ||||||||||
Note 18 | Pensions | |||||||
Defined contribution plan | ||||||||
Norwegian Air Shuttle Sweden AB's post employment benefits consist of both defined contribution plans and defined benefit plans. Under a defined contribution plan, the Company’s only obligation is to pay a fixed premium to a separate entity (a fund), and will have no obligation to pay further contributions if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to pay all employee benefits. The related actuarial and investment risks fall on the employee. The expenditures for defined contribution plans are recognized as costs during the period in which the employee provides service. Under a defined benefit plan it is the Company is obliged to provide agreed benefits to current and former employees. The related actuarial and investment risks fall on the Company. | ||||||||
The pension plans of certain employees are secured through insurance at Alecta. Alecta has not been able to produce the necessary information in order for Swedish companies to account for defined benefit plans according to IAS 19. These pension plans are therefore accounted for as defined contribution plans. | ||||||||
The defined contribution plans require that Norwegian Air Shuttle Sweden AB pays premiums to public or private administrative pension plans on mandatory, contractual or voluntary basis. The Company has no further obligations once these premiums are paid. The premiums are accounted for as personnel expenses as soon as they are. Pre-paid premiums are accounted for as an asset to the extent that future benefits can be determined as plausible. | ||||||||
A total of 76 employees were included in the pension plan at 31 December 2010 (2009: 140). Total pension costs expensed in profit or loss in 2010 was MNOK 10.9 (2009: MNOK 12.2) | ||||||||
Employees in Call Norwegian AS participate in a defined contribution plan and a defined benefit plan. The contribution plan complies with Norwegian Pension legislation (OTP). The defined benefit plan is outlined below. | ||||||||
Defined benefit plan | ||||||||
All employees in Norway participate in a defined benefit plan. The benefits are mainly dependent on pension entitlement earned, salary at the time of retirement and the size of payments from the National Insurance. The liabilities are covered through Vital AS. The plan also covers a life insurance and disability insurance. Per 31 December 2010, a total of 1,857 employees were active members (2009: 1,465), and 32 (2009: 30) were on pension retirement. In addition, employees are included in the early retirement scheme (AFP), which is an unfunded plan for retirement right at the age of 62. The AFP is a multi-employer plan, where the Norwegian government pays a contribution of 40% of paid pensions for the retired persons older than 64 years. The Group payments of contribution to the plan are recognized as an expense in the income statement as incurred. The Group also pays 25% of the pension paid to own pensioners. This is an obligation for the Group that is not funded. The AFP obligation for the Group is shown under the heading "unfunded". At 31 December 2010, 0 employees were active in the AFP pension plan (2009:495), and no employees had retired in the AFP pension plan. The AFP pension plan was closed during 2010, causing a settlement transaction of MNOK 4 recognized in the income statement as a cost reduction in pension expenses. The former AFP pension plan is replaced by a new multi-employer plan, where the Norwegian government finances 1/3 of the contribution plans. The new AFP pension plan is a defined benefit plan administered by a separate legal entity (Fellesordningen). The plan is temporarily accounted for as a defined contribution plan, as the plans administrators have not been able to calculate the pension obligation for each entity participating in the plan. | ||||||||
The scheme is in compliance with the Occupational Pensions Act. | ||||||||
The pension obligation in the defined benefit plan is calculated on linear accumulation. Changes in the obligation due to changes in and deviations from the estimated assumptions, are spread over the estimated average remaining vesting period for the part of deviations which exceeds 10% of the gross pension liability. Pension costs for the year for the Groups defined benefit plans are calculated by independent actuaries and are based on information as of 1 January 2010. The management has assessed the changes in the estimates and basis of calculation and concluded that these changes have no material impact on the pension cost for 2010. | ||||||||
Risk tables for death and disability are based on the most commonly used statistics in Norway, (K-2005) and (IR 02) respectively. | ||||||||
Pension expense (NOK 1 000) | Funded | Unfunded | Total 2010 | Total 2009 | ||||
Net present value of benefits earned | 112 784 | 786 | 113 570 | 103 346 | ||||
Interest cost on pension liability | 20 747 | 116 | 20 863 | 14 674 | ||||
Return on plan assets | -18 981 | 0 | -18 981 | -15 594 | ||||
Administrative expenses | 2 630 | 0 | 2 630 | 2 485 | ||||
Recognized actuarial gains/losses | 4 377 | 540 | 4 917 | 6 581 | ||||
Recognized net liability - settlement | 0 | -4 028 | -4 028 | 0 | ||||
Accrual for settlement liability | 0 | 3 772 | 3 772 | 0 | ||||
Social security tax | 16 522 | 127 | 16 649 | 14 793 | ||||
Net pension expense defined benefit plans | 138 079 | 1 313 | 139 392 | 126 285 | ||||
Pension expense on defined contribution plans | 14 436 | 12 200 | ||||||
Total pension expense | 153 827 | 138 485 | ||||||
Defined benefit liability and fund (NOK 1 000) | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Funded | Unfunded | Total | Funded | Unfunded | Total | |||
Change in present value of defined benefit liability: | ||||||||
Gross pension liability 01.01 | 473 699 | 2 665 | 476 364 | 394 094 | 2 029 | 396 123 | ||
Current service costs | 112 784 | 786 | 113 570 | 102 828 | 518 | 103 346 | ||
Interest cost | 20 747 | 116 | 20 863 | 14 598 | 76 | 14 674 | ||
Actuarial gains/losses | 81 216 | 0 | 81 216 | -32 671 | 42 | -32 629 | ||
Settlement | 0 | -3 567 | -3 567 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Accrual for settlement liability | 0 | 3 306 | 3 306 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Benefits paid | -5 163 | 0 | -5 163 | -5 150 | 0 | -5 150 | ||
Gross pension liability 31.12 | 683 283 | 3 306 | 686 588 | 473 699 | 2 665 | 476 364 | ||
Change in fair value of plan assets: | ||||||||
Fair value of pension assets 01.01 | 292 164 | 0 | 292 164 | 233 000 | 0 | 233 000 | ||
Expected return | 18 981 | 0 | 18 981 | 15 594 | 0 | 15 594 | ||
Actuarial gains/losses | -2 822 | 0 | -2 822 | -28 148 | 0 | -28 148 | ||
Administrative expenses | -2 630 | 0 | -2 630 | -2 485 | 0 | -2 485 | ||
Contributions paid | 101 347 | 0 | 101 347 | 79 353 | 0 | 79 353 | ||
Benefits paid | -5 163 | 0 | -5 163 | -5 150 | 0 | -5 150 | ||
Fair value of plan assets 31.12 | 401 877 | 0 | 401 877 | 292 164 | 0 | 292 164 | ||
Net pension liability | 281 406 | 3 306 | 284 711 | 181 535 | 2 665 | 184 200 | ||
Unrecognized actuarial gains/losses | -178 472 | 0 | -178 472 | -98 189 | -473 | -98 662 | ||
Social security tax | 14 967 | 466 | 15 433 | 11 753 | 267 | 12 020 | ||
Net recognised pension liability 31.12 | 117 901 | 3 772 | 121 672 | 95 099 | 2 459 | 97 558 | ||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Actual return on pension funds *) | 6.20% | 5.40% | ||||||
Expected contribution to be paid next year | 104 480 | 83 300 | ||||||
Expected benefits to be paid next year | 5 599 | 5 163 | ||||||
*) actual return on pension funds is based on reported amounts per first quarter each year | ||||||||
The net pension liability is based on several assumptions. The discount rate is based on long term government bonds in Norway, with adjustments for duration. The pension liability's average duration is 25 years. Wage adjustments, pension adjustments and the expected increase in state pensions are based on historical observations for the Group, and an expected long term inflation rate of 2.5 %. | ||||||||
2010 | 2 009 | |||||||
Discount rate | 4.00% | 4.40% | ||||||
Expected return on pension funds | 5.40% | 5.60% | ||||||
Wage adjustments | 3.75% | 4.00% | ||||||
Increase of social security base amount (G) | 3.75% | 4.00% | ||||||
Future pension increase | 1.30% | 1.30% | ||||||
Average turnover | 2-10 % | 2-10 % | ||||||
The Group’s pension fund is invested in the following instruments; | ||||||||
2010 | 2 009 | |||||||
Equity | 15.1% | 9.8% | ||||||
Bonds | 15.4% | 19.0% | ||||||
Money market funds | 17.4% | 16.3% | ||||||
Hold-to-maturity bonds | 33.7% | 36.4% | ||||||
Real estate | 16.8% | 16.6% | ||||||
Various | 1.5% | 1.2% | ||||||
The table shows actual distribution of plan assets at 30 September 2010 and at 30 September 2009. | ||||||||
Historical Information | ||||||||
NOK 1 000 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | |||
Present value of defined benefit obligation | 686 588 | 483 721 | 396 123 | 249 401 | 185 325 | |||
Fair value of plan assets | 401 877 | 301 612 | 233 000 | 175 000 | 137 516 | |||
Deficit/(surplus) in the plan | 284 711 | 182 109 | 163 123 | 74 401 | 47 809 | |||
Experience adjustments on plan liabilities | 81 092 | -25 272 | 50 340 | 19 506 | -1 646 | |||
Experience adjustments on plan assets | 2 130 | -28 148 | 2 549 | -2 375 | 3 039 | |||
Sensitivity | ||||||||
The sensitivity analysis shows effects on net pension liability and pension expense if the discount rate and wage adjustment used in the actuarial calculations had been 1% higher (+)/lower (-) at 1 January 2010; | ||||||||
Sensitivity analysis pensions 2010 | ||||||||
(NOK 1 000) | Discount rate | Wage adjustment | ||||||
+ 1% | - 1% | + 1% | - 1% | |||||
Net pension liability 31 December (%) | -24% | 22% | 13% | -14% | ||||
Net pension expense (%) | -19% | 29% | 24% | -19% | ||||
Net pension liability 31 December | 98 554 | 155 740 | 139 923 | 105 855 | ||||
Net pension expense | 127 343 | 194 251 | 187 281 | 127 343 | ||||
Note 19 | Provisions | ||||
Periodic maintenance on leased Boeing 737 aircraft; | |||||
NOK 1 000 | 2010 | 2009 | |||
Opening balance | 132 598 | 114 090 | |||
Utilized | -1 188 128 | -858 976 | |||
Accruals | 1 173 231 | 877 484 | |||
Reversals | 0 | 0 | |||
Closing balance | 117 701 | 132 598 | |||
Classified as short term liabilities | 22 740 | 62 262 | |||
Classified as long term provision | 94 961 | 70 336 | |||
The lease contracts require the aircraft to be returned at the end of the lease term in accordance with specific redelivery conditions stated in the contract. In addition, the Group is obliged to follow the maintenance program as defined by Boeing. In order to meet this requirement, the Group must carry out maintenance of aircraft, both regularly as well as at the expiration of the leasing period. The overhaul and maintenance of the aircraft is a contractual lease obligation. | |||||
Each airborne hour or cycle completed by the aircraft determines the timing and nature of the overhaul and maintenance which must be carried out. For some of the contracts, there is a degree of uncertainty about what kind of maintenance is covered by the maintenance funds, and the provision for this increase in expenses for the Group is distributed over the period until the maintenance is conducted. | |||||
The estimation technique for maintenance reserve contribution (MRC) accruals is based on contractual payments for maintenance and mandatory maintenance. The estimated costs of overhaul and maintenance are based on the Group’s maintenance program and contractual prices. In addition, accruals are set to meet redelivery conditions for leased aircraft. Accruals are highly dependent on redelivery date and redelivery conditions of the different lease terms. In case of lease extension, estimates on maintenance costs will be revised. | |||||
Parts of the periodic maintenance will be conducted in 2011, and MNOK 22.74 is classified as short term liability for periodic maintenance (2009: MNOK 62.3). The short term part of periodic maintenance is estimated based on planned maintenance in 2011. | |||||
Sensitivity | |||||
An analysis of the sensitivity on the MRC accruals is shown below; | |||||
2010 (NOK 1 000) | 5% increased production | 5% decreased production | |||
MRC accruals*: | 4.12% | -4.12% | |||
4 853 | -4 853 | ||||
* Based on MRC accruals 2010. Any changes in future maintenance due to increased/decreased production are not included. | |||||
2010 (NOK 1 000) | 1 yr lease extension | 15 yrs lease extension | 2 yrs lease extension | ||
MRC accruals*: | 41.60% | 57.90% | 71.90% | ||
48 911 | 68 091 | 84 639 | |||
* Based on MRC accruals 2010. Any changes in future maintenance due to increased/decreased production are not included. | |||||
Note 20 | Financial instruments | ||||||||||
Financial instruments by category | |||||||||||
The accounting policies for financial instruments have been applied to the line items below (NOK 1 000): | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
December 31 2010 (NOK 1 000) | Loans and receivables | Fair value through profit or loss | Available-for-sale financial assets | Total | Loans and receivables | Fair value through profit or loss | Available-for-sale financial assets | Total | |||
Available-for-sale financial assets | 0 | 0 | 2 689 | 2 689 | 0 | 0 | 7 236 | 7 236 | |||
Derivative financial instruments | 0 | 43 395 | 0 | 43 395 | 0 | 23 688 | 0 | 23 688 | |||
Trade and other receivables *) | 788 341 | 0 | 0 | 788 341 | 728 779 | 0 | 0 | 728 779 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents | 1 178 416 | 0 | 0 | 1 178 416 | 1 408 475 | 0 | 0 | 1 408 475 | |||
Total | 1 966 757 | 43 395 | 2 689 | 2 012 841 | 2 137 254 | 23 688 | 7 236 | 2 168 178 | |||
*) Prepayments not included in trade and other receivables | 107 044 | 127 505 | |||||||||
2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
December 31 2010 (NOK 1 000) | Fair value through profit or loss | Other financial liabilities | Total | Fair value through profit or loss | Other financial liabilities | Total | |||||
Borrowings | 0 | 2 484 882 | 2 484 882 | 0 | 1 583 010 | 1 583 010 | |||||
Derivative financial instruments | 15 003 | 0 | 15 003 | 1 227 | 0 | 1 227 | |||||
Trade and other receivables *) | 0 | 951 592 | 951 592 | 0 | 656 250 | 656 250 | |||||
Total | 15 003 | 3 436 473 | 3 451 476 | 1 227 | 2 239 260 | 2 240 487 | |||||
*) Public duties not included in trade and other payables | 111 845 | 90 299 | |||||||||
See note 22 for details related to borrowings. | |||||||||||
Credit quality of financial asset | |||||||||||
(NOK 1 000) | |||||||||||
Trade receivables | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Counterparties with external credit rating | |||||||||||
A or better *) | 382 751 | 0 | |||||||||
Counterparties without external credit rating | 405 591 | 728 779 | |||||||||
Total trade receivables | 788 341 | 728 779 | |||||||||
*) no rating in 2009 | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
A+ or better | 577 940 | 1 021 335 | |||||||||
BBB + | 600 476 | 387 140 | |||||||||
Total cash and cash equivalents | 1 178 416 | 1 408 475 | |||||||||
Derivative financial assets | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
A+ or better | 43 395 | 23 688 | |||||||||
Total derivative and financial assets | 43 395 | 23 688 | |||||||||
Available-for-sale financial assets | |||||||||||
(NOK 1 000) | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
1 January | 7 236 | 5 628 | |||||||||
Additions | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Sale | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Net gains/(losses) recognized in comprehensive income | 2 767 | 1 608 | |||||||||
Net gains/(losses) recognized in profit or loss | -7 314 | 0 | |||||||||
December 31 st | 2 689 | 7 236 | |||||||||
Non-current portion | 2 689 | 7 236 | |||||||||
Current portion | 0 | 0 | |||||||||
Available-for-sale financial assets at 31 December 2010 consist of an investment in unlisted equity instrument in Silver Pensjonsforsikring. The fair value of available for sale financial assets is MNOK 2.7 (2009: MNOK 7.2). Fair value of the equity investment is estimated by calculating fair value per share from Holberg Fondsforvaltning AS multiplied with the number of shares held in the investment. Holberg Fondsforvaltning AS is a professional investment manager situated in Norway. The fair value of the shares is considered to be the best estimate for the market value of the investment, see note 3 for fair value calculations. | |||||||||||
A reduction in fair value of MNOK 4.6 was recognized in the income statement as an impairment loss on available-for-sale financial assets in 2010. Additionally, a loss from the previous year on fair value adjustments of MNOK 2.8 was recycled through the income statement and derecognized from comprehensive income. In total, MNOK 7.3 was recognized in the income statement as loss on available-for-sale financial assets in 2010 (see note 8). In 2009, an increase in fair value of MNOK 1.6 was recognized in comprehensive income. Available-for-sale financial assets are denominated in NOK. | |||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments | |||||||||||
(NOK 1 000) | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | ||||||||
Forward foreign exchange contracts | 0 | 15 003 | 0 | 1 227 | |||||||
Forward commodities contracts | 43 395 | 0 | 23 688 | 0 | |||||||
Total | 43 395 | 15 003 | 23 688 | 1 227 | |||||||
Non-current portion | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||
Current portion | 43 395 | 15 003 | 23 688 | 1 227 | |||||||
Trading derivatives are classified as current assets or liabilities. | |||||||||||
The total amount from derivatives which do not qualify for hedge accounting amounts to a gain of MNOK 29.7 (2009: MNOK 49.3). See details under the specification of ‘other losses/(gains)- net’ below. | |||||||||||
Forward foreign currency contracts | |||||||||||
The fair value of the outstanding forward foreign currency contracts at 31 December 2010 were MNOK -15 (2009: MNOK -1.2). At 31 December 2010, the Group had forward foreign currency contracts to secure MUSD 129.1 of future payments of aircraft leases, fuel payments, heavy maintenance cost and other operating costs denominated in USD. These contracts are used to minimize the currency risk related to future payments. | |||||||||||
Forward commodities contracts | |||||||||||
Forward commodities contracts relates to jet-fuel derivatives. The fair value of the outstanding forward commodities contracts at 31 December 2010 were MNOK 43.4 (2009: MNOK 23.7). At 31 December 2010, the Group had secured 85,000 tons of jet-fuel through derivative contracts at prices varying from USD 712 to USD 828. These contracts are expected to minimize the jet-fuel price risk related to future jet-fuel purchases. The Group had secured 87,500 tons of jet-fuel through derivatives at 31 December 2009, all of which were realized during 2010. | |||||||||||
The forward currency contracts and forward commodities contracts mature at various dates during the next 12 months. | |||||||||||
Fair value is calculated using marked to market values from financial institutions. Spot price in the marked to market calculations are based on mid-prices as set by the financial institutions (Nordea and DnB Nor) at the balance sheet date, see note 3 for fair value calculations. | |||||||||||
Other losses/(gains) - net | |||||||||||
NOK 1 000 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | |||||||||||
- Fair value losses | 420 696 | 121 400 | |||||||||
- Fair value gains | -450 882 | -170 714 | |||||||||
- Foreign exchange (gains)/losses on operating activities | 454 | 0 | |||||||||
Total | -29 732 | -49 314 | |||||||||
No financial instruments were designated as hedging instruments in 2010 or 2009. Losses and gains on financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are classified as ‘other losses/(gains) – net’. Foreign exchange losses and gains on operating activities are classified as other losses/(gains) – net. | |||||||||||
Note 21 | Trade and other payables | |||
NOK 1 000 | 2010 | 2008 | ||
Accrued vacation pay | 110 481 | 97 347 | ||
Accrued airport and transportation taxes | 327 955 | 178 395 | ||
Accrued expenses | 42 105 | 76 427 | ||
Trade payables | 390 505 | 220 007 | ||
Payable to related party | 4 117 | 0 | ||
Public duties | 111 845 | 90 299 | ||
Short term provision for MRC | 22 740 | 62 262 | ||
Other short term provisions | 53 689 | 21 811 | ||
Total | 1 063 436 | 746 549 | ||
The short term payables and provisions are non interest bearing and are due within the next 12 months. | ||||
Note 22 | Borrowings | |||||
Nominal value at 31 December 2010 | ||||||
(NOK 1 000) | Nominal value | Amortization | Book value | Effective interest rate | ||
Bond issue | 600 000 | -2 632 | 597 368 | 8.6% | ||
Facility agreement | 368 168 | -981 | 367 187 | 2.5% | ||
Aircraft financing | 1 395 575 | -76 066 | 1 319 509 | 4.5% | ||
Loan facility | 176 429 | -584 | 175 845 | 4.5% | ||
Financial lease liability | 24 973 | 0 | 24 973 | 5.6% | ||
Total | 2 565 144 | -80 263 | 2 484 882 | |||
Nominal value at 31 December 2009 | ||||||
(NOK 1 000) | Nominal value | Amortization | Book value | Effective interest rate | ||
Bond issue | 563 000 | -2 006 | 560 994 | 8.6% | ||
Facility agreement | 628 394 | -4 784 | 623 610 | 7.8% | ||
Aircraft financing | 400 682 | -31 106 | 369 577 | 5.4% | ||
Loan facility | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Financial lease liability | 28 829 | 0 | 28 829 | 7.2% | ||
Total | 1 620 905 | -37 896 | 1 583 010 | |||
Classification of borrowings | ||||||
NOK 1 000 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
Non-current | ||||||
Bond issue | 597 368 | 398 296 | ||||
Facility agreement | 0 | 144 747 | ||||
Aircraft financing | 1 197 833 | 335 833 | ||||
Loan facility | 148 702 | 0 | ||||
Financial lease liability | 20 007 | 28 829 | ||||
Total | 1 963 910 | 907 705 | ||||
Current | ||||||
Bond issue | 0 | 162 698 | ||||
Facility agreement | 367 187 | 478 863 | ||||
Aircraft financing | 121 676 | 33 743 | ||||
Loan facility | 27 143 | 0 | ||||
Financial lease liability | 4 966 | 0 | ||||
Total | 520 972 | 675 303 | ||||
Total borrowings | 2 484 882 | 1 583 010 | ||||
Collateralized borrowings are detailed in note 23. | ||||||
Covenants | ||||||
Bond issue | ||||||
Equity/Capital Employed higher than 30% | ||||||
(Capital Employed = equity + borrowings) | ||||||
Dividend payments less than 35% of net profit | ||||||
Revolving credit facility | ||||||
For the revolving credit facility it is agreed that covenants are linked to cash and cash equivalents in a ratio related to operating cost. In addition it is agreed that a covenant is linked to gearing (net debt to total capital). Both covenants must be in breach simultaneously in order to be in violation of the covenants. | ||||||
Aircraft financing | ||||||
No financial covenants. All borrowings related to delivery of new 737-800 aircraft from Boeing are guaranteed by the Ex-Im Bank of the United States. The Ex-Im Bank of the United States has pledged security in the owned aircraft delivered under the Boeing contract. | ||||||
Loan facility | ||||||
Equity/Capital Employed higher than 30% | ||||||
(Capital Employed = equity + interest bearing debt) | ||||||
Free liquidity higher than 15% | ||||||
(Free liquidity = Cash/Total funded debt (interest bearing debt)) | ||||||
Cash flow consisting of; Total funded debts + leasing charges * 7- cash/EBITDAR must be higher than 6 | ||||||
There are no covenants related to the financial lease liability. | ||||||
The Group has not been in breach of any covenants during 2010. | ||||||
Fair value calculations | ||||||
The carrying amounts and fair values of the non-current borrowings are as follows; | ||||||
Carrying amount | Fair value | |||||
(NOK 1 000) | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||
Bond issue | 597 368 | 398 296 | 602 997 | 400 000 | ||
Facility agreement | 0 | 144 747 | 0 | 144 747 | ||
Aircraft financing | 1 197 833 | 335 833 | 1 240 418 | 347 149 | ||
Loan facility | 148 702 | 0 | 148 702 | 0 | ||
Financial lease liability | 20 007 | 28 829 | 23 180 | 23 745 | ||
Fair value of non-current borrowings on the facility agreement from 2009 equals the carrying amount as transaction costs deducted from the notional amount are higher than future interest payments. The fair value of current borrowings approximates their carrying amount as the impact of discounting is not significant. The fair value of non-current borrowings are based on cash flows which are discounted using a rate based on the following assumptions: | ||||||
Bond Issue | ||||||
Interest rate of NIBOR 3 m and a risk premium equal to the spread at the balance sheet date. The bond issue is an unsecured bond issue denominated in NOK and matures 17 December 2012. The coupon is NIBOR + 5.75%. | ||||||
ISIN: NO001 0560915 | ||||||
Name: Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA 09/12 FRN | ||||||
Facility agreement | ||||||
Interest rate of LIBOR 1 m and a risk premium equal to the spread at the balance sheet date. The facility agreement was entered into in 2008 with the French financial institution; Natixis. The facility will finance pre-delivery-payments (PDP's) related to the first 10 aircraft of the Boeing contract. | ||||||
The borrowings mature at the delivery of each aircraft and final delivery matures at 31 March 2011. The facility agreement is classified as short term borrowings and denominated in USD. | ||||||
Aircraft financing | ||||||
Fixed interest rate based on LIBOR 7 y and a risk premium equal to the spread at the balance sheet date. The spread is not entity specific, as the agreed spread is based on an overall credit risk in the financial markets in the United States. | ||||||
The borrowings mature quarterly after the delivery of the aircraft from Boeing. See note 2 for further maturity analysis of borrowings. The aircraft financing is denominated in USD. | ||||||
Loan facility | ||||||
Floating interest of NIBOR 3 m and a risk premium of 1.75%. The loan facility is denominated in NOK and matures quarterly, with the final commitment to pay on 30 June 2014. See note 2 for further maturity analysis of borrowings. | ||||||
Financial lease liability | ||||||
The liability is de facto secured in the financial lease asset, as the rights and obligations of the leased asset is returned to the lessor if the lease agreement is not fulfilled. | ||||||
The discount rates used to calculate the fair value of the financial lease liability equals the risk free interest rate and spread related to the loan facility in 2010 and the unsecured bond issue in 2009 as these borrowings are assessed to be the best estimate for credit spread on financial lease liability. The financial lease liability is denominated in NOK. | ||||||
Future minimum lease payments under financial lease liability | ||||||
(NOK 1 000) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
Future minimum lease payments | ||||||
-No later than 1 year | 5 830 | 6 129 | ||||
-Between 1 and 5 years | 20 573 | 19 003 | ||||
-Later than 5 years | 2 907 | 10 026 | ||||
Total | 29 310 | 35 158 | ||||
Future finance charges on financial lease liability | 4 337 | 6 329 | ||||
Present value of financial lease liability | 24 973 | 28 829 | ||||
Note 23 | Assets pledged as collateral and guarantees | |||||
Liabilities secured by pledge (NOK 1 000): | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
Facility agreement | 367 187 | 623 610 | ||||
Aircraft financing | 1 319 509 | 369 577 | ||||
Loan Facility | 175 845 | 0 | ||||
Financial lease liability | 24 973 | 28 829 | ||||
Total | 1 887 513 | 1 022 016 | ||||
Prepayments of the first 10 aircraft in the purchase contract with Boeing (see note 11) are pledged as collateral for the revolving credit facility (see note 22). The owned aircraft (see note 11) are pledged as collateral for the aircraft financing (see note 22). Five 737-300 fully owned aircraft are pledged as collateral for the loan facility (see note 22). There is no pledged collateral for the financial lease liability, but the financial lease asset is an actual security for the financial lease liability through fulfilment of the lease agreement. | ||||||
Book value of assets pledged as security (NOK 1 000): | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
Cash depot | 335 422 | 132 476 | ||||
Prepayment and aircraft | 3 994 969 | 1 874 718 | ||||
Financial lease asset | 31 203 | 26 092 | ||||
Total | 4 361 594 | 2 033 286 | ||||
Note 24 | Bank deposits | |||
NOK 1 000 | 2010 | 2009 | ||
Cash in bank | 577 940 | 1 021 335 | ||
Cash equivalents | 600 476 | 387 140 | ||
Total | 1 178 416 | 1 408 475 | ||
Deposits in money market funds are classified as cash equivalents, as the underlying maturity of the deposits are 3 months or less. At 31 December 2009, the interest terms on the cash deposits on folio accounts is 1 month NIBOR - 0.15 to - 0.30% p.a. Interest terms on restricted cash deposits on folio accounts is 1 month NIBOR - 0.15% p.a. | ||||
Receivables on credit card companies are included in trade receivables. See note 13. | ||||
Restricted cash items are: | ||||
NOK 1 000 | 2010 | 2009 | ||
Guarantees for leases and credits from suppliers | 335 422 | 132 476 | ||
Taxes withheld | 54 673 | 46 847 | ||
Total restricted cash | 390 095 | 179 323 | ||
Bank guarantees are granted for leasing liabilities of aircraft, suppliers of fuel and handling services, as well as airport charges from airports and governments. | ||||
Note 25 | Investment in subsidiaries | |||||||
Norwegian Air Shuttle Polska SP.zo.o | ||||||||
The subsidiary was established in 2006 and is 100% owned. All of the Group’s revenue generating assets is owned by Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA. The Polish subsidiary has supplied crew and administrative services to the Group. | ||||||||
Norwegian Air Shuttle Sweden AB | ||||||||
The subsidiary was purchased on 31 July 2007. The Group owns 100 % of the shares in Norwegian Air Shuttle Sweden AB. The total purchase price was MNOK 199.8. The company is based at Arlanda Airport, Stockholm, Sweden. The Swedish subsidiary supplies the crew and provides technical service. Transactions between the parent company and the Swedish subsidiary during 2010 consisted of the supply of personnel. On 1 July 2009, the entire airline operation in Norwegian Air Shuttle Sweden AB was transferred to Norwegian air Shuttle ASA through the purchase of assets. | ||||||||
Call Norwegian AS | ||||||||
On 14 January 2008 the Group established Call Norwegian AS, and owns 100% of the shares. The company provides mobile- and content services, mobile broadband, airport wi-fi and Voip to external customer in the mass market. | ||||||||
NAS Asset Management Ireland Ltd | ||||||||
On 15 July 2008 the Group established NAS Asset Management Ltd, a special purpose entity (SPE), and owns 99.9% of the shares. NAS Asset Management Norway AS owns the remaining 0.1% of the shares. The company is incorporated in Ireland and is established for aircraft financing purposes. | ||||||||
NAS Asset Management Norway AS | ||||||||
On 15 July 2008 the Group established NAS Asset Management Norway AS, a special purpose entity (SPE), and owns 100% of the shares. NAS Asset Management Norway AS was established for aircraft financing purposes. | ||||||||
The management believes that all inter-company transactions are handled in accordance with the arm’s length principle. | ||||||||
Name | Date of initiation/aquisition | Office | Number of shares | Ownership | ||||
Norwegian Air Shuttle Polska SP.zo.o | 2006 | Warsaw, Poland | 50 000 | 100 % | ||||
Norwegian Air Shuttle Sweden AB | 7/31/2007 | Stockholm, Sweden | 20 000 | 100 % | ||||
Call Norwegian AS | 1/14/2008 | Fornebu, Oslo | 1 000 000 | 100 % | ||||
NAS Asset Management Ireland Ltd | 7/15/2008 | Dublin, Ireland | 1 000 | 100 % | ||||
NAS Asset Management Norway AS | 7/15/2008 | Fornebu, Norway | 100 | 100 % | ||||
Note 26 | Investment associated company | ||||||||||
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has the following investments in associates (NOK 1 000); | |||||||||||
Entity | Country | Industry | Ownership interest | Carrying amount 31.12.2009 | Net profit (loss) 2010 | Share issue 2010 | Carrying amount 31.12.2010 | ||||
Norwegian Finans Holding ASA | Norway | Financial Institution | 20 % | 47 943 | 6 328 | 8 000 | 62 272 | ||||
The associated company, Norwegian Finans Holding ASA, owns 100% of the shares in Bank Norwegian AS. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA owns 20% of the shares in Norwegian Finans Holding ASA. The company is situated in Oslo, Norway. The equity method is applied when accounting for the investment, and the Group’s share of the associated company’s profit and loss is included in the carrying amount. | |||||||||||
The Group’s share of the results and its aggregate assets and liabilities in the associated company, are as follows; | |||||||||||
2010 (NOK 1 000) | |||||||||||
Entity | Country | Assets | Liabilities | Revenues | Profit/(Loss) | Interest held % | |||||
Norwegian Finans Holding ASA | Norway | 581 427 | 525 091 | 37 565 | 6 328 | 20% | |||||
2009 (NOK 1 000) | |||||||||||
Entity | Country | Assets | Liabilities | Revenues | Profit/(Loss) | Interest held % | |||||
Norwegian Finans Holding ASA | Norway | 411 627 | 369 957 | 23 332 | 3 200 | 20% | |||||
Note 27 | Related party transactions | |||||||
Transactions with related parties | ||||||||
The Chief Executive Officer is the principal shareholder in Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA with an ownership share of 27.48 % through the controlling ownership of HBK Invest AS. The Chairman of the Board owns minority shares in HBK Invest AS. There have been no financial transactions between HBK Invest AS and Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA in 2010 or 2009, except for indirect transactions through Fornebu Næringseiendom. | ||||||||
The Chairman of the Board, Bjørn Kise, is a partner, and the CEO is a former partner, of the law firm Vogt & Wiig which operates as the legal advisor for Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA. | ||||||||
The Group leases its property at Fornebu from Fornebu Næringseiendom AS, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of HBK Invest AS. The leasing agreement entitles the Group to lease Oksenøyveien 3 at Fornebu for ten years until 2020, with an option to extend the lease for another five years. | ||||||||
The parent company has received commission from the associated company in 2010 and 2009. The commission relates to sales made by the parent company's customers by using the 'Bank Norwegian' credit cards. The total commission is enclosed in the table below. Receivables and payables to related parties are enclosed below. | ||||||||
No loans or guarantees have been issued to related parties in 2010 or 2009. | ||||||||
See note 7 for details on key management compensation and note 15 for shares and options held directly or indirectly by members of the Board of Directors, the CEO and the Executive Management. | ||||||||
Terms and conditions for transactions with related parties | ||||||||
The management believe that transactions with related parties are performed at arm’s-lengths conditions. Terms and principles for transactions with related parties are continuously evaluated. | ||||||||
The following transactions were carried out with related parties (NOK 1 000): | ||||||||
Sales (-) and purchases (+) of goods and services (excl VAT) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
- Vogt & Wiig (legal services) | 3 160 | 3 447 | ||||||
- Associate (commission) | -14 810 | -9 540 | ||||||
- Fornebu Næringseiendom (property rent) | 17 053 | 0 | ||||||
- Ola Krohn-Fagervold (services as Board Member - note 7) | 56 | 0 | ||||||
Year-end balances arising from sales/purchases of goods/services (incl VAT) | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Receivables from related parties (note 13) | ||||||||
- Vogt & Wiig (legal services) | 0 | 0 | ||||||
- Associate (commission) | 12 148 | 850 | ||||||
- Fornebu Næringseiendom (property rent) | 0 | 0 | ||||||
- Ola Krohn-Fagervold (services as Board Member - note 7) | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Payables from related parties (note 21) | ||||||||
- Vogt & Wiig (legal services) | -40 | 0 | ||||||
- Associate (commission) | 0 | 0 | ||||||
- Fornebu Næringseiendom (property rent) | -4 077 | 0 | ||||||
- Ola Krohn-Fagervold (services as Board Member - note 7) | 0 | 0 | ||||||
Investment in related parties | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
- Associate (subordinated loan) | 30 000 | 30088 | ||||||
Note 28 | Contingencies and legal claims | ||||
The group has no contingencies or legal claims at 31 December 2010. | |||||
Note 29 | Commitments | ||||
Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA entered in August 2007 a purchase agreement of 42 new Boeing 737-800 aircraft with Blended Winglets. The aircraft have a list price of USD 3.1 billion. Norwegian Air Shuttle ASA has also ensured the purchase rights of an additional 42 aircraft of the same model from Boeing. | |||||
In October 2009 and July 2010 Norwegian exercised 21 purchase rights, making a total order of 63 aircraft for direct-by for Boeing 737-800 aircraft. Remaining purchase rights as of 31 December 2010 are 27 aircraft. | |||||
During 2009 and 2010 Norwegian received 9 aircraft. The remaining 54 aircraft will be delivered over a six-year period from 2011 to 2016. The purchase price will be paid over several USD installments before and on delivery of each aircraft. | |||||
For details on commitments for aircraft leases, see note 12. | |||||
Note 30 | Events after the balance sheet date | ||||
The Group has secured guarantees from the Ex-Im Bank of the United States for 12 aircraft scheduled for delivery in 2011 and 2012. The Private Export Funding Corporation (lender) has committed direct loans for four aircraft under the Ex-Im guarantee, scheduled for delivery March-May 2011. | |||||

